» Articles » PMID: 30761387

Impact of the SPOP Mutant Subtype on the Interpretation of Clinical Parameters in Prostate Cancer

Abstract

Purpose: Molecular characterization of prostate cancer, including The Cancer Genome Atlas, has revealed distinct subtypes with underlying genomic alterations. One of these core subtypes, (speckle-type POZ protein) mutant prostate cancer, has previously only been identifiable via DNA sequencing, which has made the impact on prognosis and routinely used risk stratification parameters unclear.

Methods: We have developed a novel gene expression signature, classifier (Subclass Predictor Based on Transcriptional Data), and decision tree to predict the mutant subclass from RNA gene expression data and classify common prostate cancer molecular subtypes. We then validated and further interrogated the association of prostate cancer molecular subtypes with pathologic and clinical outcomes in retrospective and prospective cohorts of 8,158 patients.

Results: The subclass predictor based on transcriptional data model showed high sensitivity and specificity in multiple cohorts across both RNA sequencing and microarray gene expression platforms. We predicted approximately 8% to 9% of cases to be mutant from both retrospective and prospective cohorts. We found that the mutant subclass was associated with lower frequency of positive margins, extraprostatic extension, and seminal vesicle invasion at prostatectomy; however, mutant cancers were associated with higher pretreatment serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA). The association between mutant status and higher PSA level was validated in three independent cohorts. Despite high pretreatment PSA, the SPOP mutant subtype was associated with a favorable prognosis with improved metastasis-free survival, particularly in patients with high-risk preoperative PSA levels.

Conclusion: Using a novel gene expression model and a decision tree algorithm to define prostate cancer molecular subclasses, we found that the mutant subclass is associated with higher preoperative PSA, less adverse pathologic features, and favorable prognosis. These findings suggest a paradigm in which the interpretation of common risk stratification parameters, particularly PSA, may be influenced by the underlying molecular subtype of prostate cancer.

Citing Articles

Defining biology and recurrence risk in prostate cancers treated by neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy.

Wilkinson S, Sowalsky A J Natl Cancer Inst. 2023; 116(1):12-14.

PMID: 37816132 PMC: 11616737. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djad192.


Identification of molecular subtypes and a prognostic signature based on chromatin regulators related genes in prostate cancer.

Ma H, Zhou C, Ge J, Yu W, Zhou Y, Wang P Front Genet. 2023; 13:1110723.

PMID: 36704352 PMC: 9871366. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.1110723.


Speckle-type POZ protein could play a potential inhibitory role in human renal cell carcinoma.

Chen Z, Li Z, Li C, Li B, Wang H, Nong D BMC Cancer. 2022; 22(1):1277.

PMID: 36474188 PMC: 9727862. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-10340-w.


Race and prostate cancer: genomic landscape.

Arenas-Gallo C, Owiredu J, Weinstein I, Lewicki P, Basourakos S, Vince Jr R Nat Rev Urol. 2022; 19(9):547-561.

PMID: 35945369 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-022-00622-0.


Transcriptome Profiles Reveal a 12-Signature Metabolic Prediction Model and a Novel Role of Myo-Inositol Oxygenase in the Progression of Prostate Cancer.

Liu W, Xiang J, Wu X, Wei S, Huang H, Xiao Y Front Oncol. 2022; 12:899861.

PMID: 35669435 PMC: 9163567. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.899861.


References
1.
Cooperberg M, Pasta D, Elkin E, Litwin M, Latini D, Du Chane J . The University of California, San Francisco Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment score: a straightforward and reliable preoperative predictor of disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2005; 173(6):1938-42. PMC: 2948569. DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000158155.33890.e7. View

2.
Tomlins S, Laxman B, Dhanasekaran S, Helgeson B, Cao X, Morris D . Distinct classes of chromosomal rearrangements create oncogenic ETS gene fusions in prostate cancer. Nature. 2007; 448(7153):595-9. DOI: 10.1038/nature06024. View

3.
Lapointe J, Li C, Giacomini C, Salari K, Huang S, Wang P . Genomic profiling reveals alternative genetic pathways of prostate tumorigenesis. Cancer Res. 2007; 67(18):8504-10. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-0673. View

4.
Cooperberg M, Broering J, Carroll P . Risk assessment for prostate cancer metastasis and mortality at the time of diagnosis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009; 101(12):878-87. PMC: 2697208. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djp122. View

5.
Fine S, Gopalan A, Leversha M, Al-Ahmadie H, Tickoo S, Zhou Q . TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusion is associated with low Gleason scores and not with high-grade morphological features. Mod Pathol. 2010; 23(10):1325-33. PMC: 3413944. DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2010.120. View