» Articles » PMID: 30761205

Concordance Among Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis Measures of Percent Body Fat in Athletic Young Adults

Overview
Journal Int J Exerc Sci
Date 2019 Feb 15
PMID 30761205
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to determine the agreement among three bioelectrical impedance analysis devices (BIA) in athletic young adults. Fifty-one participants (26 men and 25 women) were assessed for percent body fat (PBF) using an arm-to-arm bipolar single-frequency device (ABIA), a leg-to-leg single-frequency device (LBIA), and an octopolar multi-frequency BIA device (MFBIA). PBF was measured with the three devices in a randomized, counterbalanced order. Repeated measures ANOVA revealed significant ( < 0.001) differences in PBF estimates among all devices (ABIA = 19.1 ± 7.2%, LBIA = 21.6 ±7.5%, and MFBIA = 22.9 ± 8.8%). Pearson's Correlations revealed a strong relationship between ABIA and MFBIA in both men ( = 0.948) and women ( = 0.947) and a moderately-strong relationship between LBIA and MFBIA ( = 0.870 and 0.679, respectively). Lin's concordance coefficient revealed moderately-strong concordance between ABIA and MFBIA in men ( = 0.800) and women ( = 0.681) and between LBIA and MFBIA ( = 0.846 and = 0.651, respectively). These data indicate a strong agreement among all three devices, suggesting that any of them could be used to track changes in PBF over time. However, the significant differences in PBF values among devices imply that best practice for monitoring body composition should be to use one device consistently over time for a reliable assessment.

Citing Articles

International society of sports nutrition position stand: nutrition and weight cut strategies for mixed martial arts and other combat sports.

Ricci A, Evans C, Stull C, Peacock C, French D, Stout J J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2025; 22(1):2467909.

PMID: 40059405 PMC: 11894756. DOI: 10.1080/15502783.2025.2467909.


Different frequencies to estimate bone mineral content from raw bioelectrical impedance data in adolescent soccer players: a critical analysis.

Cattem M, Koury J Front Nutr. 2025; 11:1524034.

PMID: 39912057 PMC: 11794091. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1524034.


Phase angle in bioelectrical impedance analysis for assessing congestion in acute heart failure.

Sohn S, Jeon J, Lee J, Park S, Kang D, Park E PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0317333.

PMID: 39854572 PMC: 11759352. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317333.


Muscle Oxygen Extraction during Vascular Occlusion Test in Physically Very Active versus Inactive Healthy Men: A Comparative Study.

Tuesta M, Yanez-Sepulveda R, Monsalves-Alvarez M, Vasquez-Bonilla A, Olivares-Arancibia J, Rojas-Valverde D J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2024; 9(2).

PMID: 38525758 PMC: 10961797. DOI: 10.3390/jfmk9020057.


Dietary Intake of Protein and Essential Amino Acids for Sustainable Muscle Development in Elite Male Athletes.

Baranauskas M, Kupciunaite I, Stukas R Nutrients. 2023; 15(18).

PMID: 37764784 PMC: 10535035. DOI: 10.3390/nu15184003.


References
1.
Utter A, Nieman D, Ward A, Butterworth D . Use of the leg-to-leg bioelectrical impedance method in assessing body-composition change in obese women. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999; 69(4):603-7. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/69.4.603. View

2.
Fornetti W, Pivarnik J, Foley J, Fiechtner J . Reliability and validity of body composition measures in female athletes. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1999; 87(3):1114-22. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1999.87.3.1114. View

3.
Cable A, Nieman D, Austin M, Hogen E, Utter A . Validity of leg-to-leg bioelectrical impedance measurement in males. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2001; 41(3):411-4. View

4.
Kyle U, Bosaeus I, De Lorenzo A, Deurenberg P, Elia M, Gomez J . Bioelectrical impedance analysis--part I: review of principles and methods. Clin Nutr. 2004; 23(5):1226-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2004.06.004. View

5.
Dixon C, Deitrick R, Pierce J, Cutrufello P, Drapeau L . Evaluation of the BOD POD and leg-to-leg bioelectrical impedance analysis for estimating percent body fat in National Collegiate Athletic Association Division III collegiate wrestlers. J Strength Cond Res. 2005; 19(1):85-91. DOI: 10.1519/14053.1. View