» Articles » PMID: 30753685

Best Practices for Dietary Supplement Assessment and Estimation of Total Usual Nutrient Intakes in Population-Level Research and Monitoring

Abstract

The use of dietary supplements (DS) is pervasive and can provide substantial amounts of micronutrients to those who use them. Therefore when characterizing dietary intakes, describing the prevalence of inadequacy or excess, or assessing relations between nutrients and health outcomes, it is critical to incorporate DS intakes to improve exposure estimates. Unfortunately, little is known about the best methods to assess DS, and the structure of measurement error in DS reporting. Several characteristics of nutrients from DS are salient to understand when comparing to those in foods. First, DS can be consumed daily or episodically, in bolus form and can deliver discrete and often very high doses of nutrients that are not limited by energy intakes. These characteristics contribute to bimodal distributions and distributions severely skewed to the right. Labels on DS often provide nutrient forms that differ from those found in conventional foods, and underestimate analytically derived values. Finally, the bioavailability of many nutrient-containing DS is not known and it may not be the same as the nutrients in a food matrix. Current methods to estimate usual intakes are not designed specifically to handle DS. Two temporal procedures are described to refer to the order that nutrient intakes are combined relative to usual intake procedures, referred to as a "shrinking" the distribution to remove random error. The "shrink then add" approach is preferable to the "add then shrink" approach when users and nonusers are combined for most research questions. Stratifying by DS before usual intake methods is another defensible option. This review describes how to incorporate nutrient intakes from DS to usual intakes from foods, and describes the available methods and fit-for-purpose of different analytical strategies to address research questions where total usual intakes are of interest at the group level for use in nutrition research and to inform policy decisions. Clinical Trial Registry: NCT03400436.

Citing Articles

Analyzing dietary exposure to critical nutrients on a plant-based diet using the food- and total nutrient index.

Storz M, Stubing F, Hannibal L, Huber R Nutr J. 2025; 24(1):39.

PMID: 40075422 PMC: 11899309. DOI: 10.1186/s12937-025-01105-9.


The Potential for Bouillon Fortification to Reduce Dietary Micronutrient Inadequacy: Modeling Analyses Using National Survey Data from Cameroon, Ghana, and Haiti.

Engle-Stone R, Kumordzie S, Luo H, Wessells K, Adu-Afarwuah S, Njebayi A Curr Dev Nutr. 2024; 8(11):104485.

PMID: 39640380 PMC: 11617227. DOI: 10.1016/j.cdnut.2024.104485.


The Evolution of Science and Regulation of Dietary Supplements: Past, Present, and Future.

Coates P, Bailey R, Blumberg J, El-Sohemy A, Floyd E, Goldenberg J J Nutr. 2024; 154(8):2335-2345.

PMID: 38971530 PMC: 11375470. DOI: 10.1016/j.tjnut.2024.06.017.


Consumption of Dietary Supplements among Working-Age Residents of Lithuania in the Period from 2021 to 2023.

Arlauskas R, Austys D, Dobrovolskij V, Stukas R Medicina (Kaunas). 2024; 60(4).

PMID: 38674315 PMC: 11051780. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60040669.


Minimum Dietary Diversity for Adolescents: Multicountry Analysis to Define Food Group Thresholds Predicting Micronutrient Adequacy among Girls and Boys Aged 10-19 Years.

Hanley-Cook G, Hoogerwerf S, Parraguez J, Gie S, Holmes B Curr Dev Nutr. 2024; 8(3):102097.

PMID: 38419832 PMC: 10899069. DOI: 10.1016/j.cdnut.2024.102097.


References
1.
Kipnis V, Subar A, Midthune D, Freedman L, Ballard-Barbash R, Troiano R . Structure of dietary measurement error: results of the OPEN biomarker study. Am J Epidemiol. 2003; 158(1):14-21; discussion 22-6. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwg091. View

2.
Freedman L, Midthune D, Arab L, Prentice R, Subar A, Willett W . Combining a Food Frequency Questionnaire With 24-Hour Recalls to Increase the Precision of Estimation of Usual Dietary Intakes-Evidence From the Validation Studies Pooling Project. Am J Epidemiol. 2018; 187(10):2227-2232. PMC: 6166211. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwy126. View

3.
Dwyer J, Nahin R, Rogers G, Barnes P, Jacques P, Sempos C . Prevalence and predictors of children's dietary supplement use: the 2007 National Health Interview Survey. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013; 97(6):1331-7. PMC: 3652925. DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.112.052373. View

4.
Ervin R, Wright J . Use of dietary supplements in the United States, 1988-94. Vital Health Stat 11. 1999; (244):i-iii, 1-14. View

5.
Patterson R, Kristal A, Tinker L, Carter R, Bolton M, Agurs-Collins T . Measurement characteristics of the Women's Health Initiative food frequency questionnaire. Ann Epidemiol. 1999; 9(3):178-87. DOI: 10.1016/s1047-2797(98)00055-6. View