» Articles » PMID: 30744629

What Links Ventilator Driving Pressure with Survival in the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome? A Computational Study

Overview
Journal Respir Res
Specialty Pulmonary Medicine
Date 2019 Feb 13
PMID 30744629
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Recent analyses of patient data in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) showed that a lower ventilator driving pressure was associated with reduced relative risk of mortality. These findings await full validation in prospective clinical trials.

Methods: To investigate the association between driving pressures and ventilator induced lung injury (VILI), we calibrated a high fidelity computational simulator of cardiopulmonary pathophysiology against a clinical dataset, capturing the responses to changes in mechanical ventilation of 25 adult ARDS patients. Each of these in silico patients was subjected to the same range of values of driving pressure and positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) used in the previous analyses of clinical trial data. The resulting effects on several physiological variables and proposed indices of VILI were computed and compared with data relating ventilator settings with relative risk of death.

Results: Three VILI indices: dynamic strain, mechanical power and tidal recruitment, showed a strong correlation with the reported relative risk of death across all ranges of driving pressures and PEEP. Other variables, such as alveolar pressure, oxygen delivery and lung compliance, correlated poorly with the data on relative risk of death.

Conclusions: Our results suggest a credible mechanistic explanation for the proposed association between driving pressure and relative risk of death. While dynamic strain and tidal recruitment are difficult to measure routinely in patients, the easily computed VILI indicator known as mechanical power also showed a strong correlation with mortality risk, highlighting its potential usefulness in designing more protective ventilation strategies for this patient group.

Citing Articles

The development of a C5.0 machine learning model in a limited data set to predict early mortality in patients with ARDS undergoing an initial session of prone positioning.

Hannon D, Syed J, McNicholas B, Madden M, Laffey J Intensive Care Med Exp. 2024; 12(1):103.

PMID: 39540987 PMC: 11564488. DOI: 10.1186/s40635-024-00682-z.


Computational Simulation of Virtual Patients Reduces Dataset Bias and Improves Machine Learning-Based Detection of ARDS from Noisy Heterogeneous ICU Datasets.

Sharafutdinov K, Fritsch S, Iravani M, Farhadi Ghalati P, Saffaran S, Bates D IEEE Open J Eng Med Biol. 2024; 5:611-620.

PMID: 39184970 PMC: 11342939. DOI: 10.1109/OJEMB.2023.3243190.


Factors associated with decreased compliance after on-site extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cannulation for acute respiratory distress syndrome: A retrospective, observational cohort study.

Le Pape S, Joly F, Arrive F, Frat J, Rodriguez M, Joos M J Intensive Med. 2024; 4(2):194-201.

PMID: 38681786 PMC: 11043634. DOI: 10.1016/j.jointm.2023.09.004.


Investigating the Association Between Dynamic Driving Pressure and Mortality in COVID-19-Related Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Joint Modeling Approach Using Real-Time Continuously-Monitored Ventilation Data.

Tan D, Plasek J, Hou P, Baron R, Atkinson B, Zhou L Crit Care Explor. 2024; 6(3):e1043.

PMID: 38449669 PMC: 10917137. DOI: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001043.


Changes in Driving Pressure vs Oxygenation as Predictor of Mortality in Moderate to Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Patients Receiving Prone Position Ventilation.

Todur P, Nileshwar A, Chaudhuri S, Shanbhag V, Cherisma C Indian J Crit Care Med. 2024; 28(2):134-140.

PMID: 38323262 PMC: 10839929. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24643.


References
1.
Brower R, Matthay M, Morris A, Schoenfeld D, Thompson B, Wheeler A . Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2000; 342(18):1301-8. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM200005043421801. View

2.
Vieillard-Baron A, Schmitt J, Augarde R, Fellahi J, Prin S, Page B . Acute cor pulmonale in acute respiratory distress syndrome submitted to protective ventilation: incidence, clinical implications, and prognosis. Crit Care Med. 2001; 29(8):1551-5. DOI: 10.1097/00003246-200108000-00009. View

3.
Brower R, Lanken P, MacIntyre N, Matthay M, Morris A, Ancukiewicz M . Higher versus lower positive end-expiratory pressures in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2004; 351(4):327-36. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa032193. View

4.
Tusman G, Bohm S, Suarez-Sipmann F, Turchetto E . Alveolar recruitment improves ventilatory efficiency of the lungs during anesthesia. Can J Anaesth. 2004; 51(7):723-7. DOI: 10.1007/BF03018433. View

5.
Lapinsky S, Mehta S . Bench-to-bedside review: Recruitment and recruiting maneuvers. Crit Care. 2005; 9(1):60-5. PMC: 1065091. DOI: 10.1186/cc2934. View