» Articles » PMID: 30741739

Esophagogastric Junction Distensibility on Functional Lumen Imaging Probe Topography Predicts Treatment Response in Achalasia-Anatomy Matters!

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2019 Feb 12
PMID 30741739
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: To compare the utility of the distensibility index (DI) on functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) topography to other esophagogastric junction (EGJ) metrics in assessing treatment response in achalasia in the context of esophageal anatomy.

Methods: We prospectively evaluated 79 patients (at ages 17-81 years; 47% female patients) with achalasia during follow-up after pneumatic dilation, Heller myotomy, or per-oral endoscopic myotomy with timed barium esophagram, high-resolution impedance manometry, and FLIP. Anatomic deformities were identified based on consensus expert opinion. Patients were classified based on anatomy and EGJ opening to determine the association with radiographic outcome and Eckardt score (ES).

Results: Twenty-seven patients (34.1%) had an anatomic deformity-10 pseudodiverticula at myotomy, 7 epiphrenic diverticula, 5 sigmoid, and 5 sinktrap. A 5-minute column area of >5 cm was best associated with an ES of >3, with a sensitivity of 84% (P = 0.0013). Area under the curve for EGJ metrics in association with retention was as follows: DI, 0.90; maximal EGJ diameter, 0.76; integrated relaxation pressure, 0.64; and basal esophagogastric junction pressure, 0.53. Only FLIP metrics were associated with retention given normal anatomy (DI 2.4 vs 5.2 mm/mm Hg and maximal EGJ diameter 13.1 vs 16.6 mm in patients with and without retention, respectively; P values < 0.0001 and 0.002). Using a DI cutoff of <2.8 as abnormal, 40 of 45 patients with retention (P = 0.0001) and 23 of 25 patients with an ES of >3 (P = 0.02) had a low DI and/or anatomic deformity. With normal anatomy, 21 of 22 patients with retention had a low or borderline low DI.

Discussion: The FLIP DI is most useful metric for assessing the effect of achalasia treatment on EGJ opening. However, abnormal anatomy is an important mediator of outcome and treatment success will be modulated by anatomic defects that impede bolus emptying.

Citing Articles

Esophageal motility disorders other than achalasia.

Kim N, Kelahan L, Carucci L Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025; .

PMID: 40024921 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-025-04828-9.


Current Approach to Dysphagia: A Review Focusing on Esophageal Motility Disorders and Their Treatment.

Mascarenhas A, Mendo R, ONeill C, Franco A, Mendes R, Simao I GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2024; 30(6):403-413.

PMID: 38476159 PMC: 10928869. DOI: 10.1159/000529428.


Presence of esophageal contractility after achalasia treatment is associated with improved esophageal emptying.

Vespa E, Farina D, Pandolfino J, Kahrilas P, Koop A, Carlson D Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2023; 36(3):e14732.

PMID: 38155413 PMC: 10922458. DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14732.


Precision Endoscopy in Peroral Myotomies for Motility Disorders of the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract: Current Insights and Prospective Avenues-A Comprehensive Review.

Mandarino F, Vespa E, Barchi A, Fasulo E, Sinagra E, Azzolini F Life (Basel). 2023; 13(11).

PMID: 38004283 PMC: 10672509. DOI: 10.3390/life13112143.


Modern Achalasia: Diagnosis, Classification, and Treatment.

Pesce M, Pagliaro M, Sarnelli G, Sweis R J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2023; 29(4):419-427.

PMID: 37814432 PMC: 10577462. DOI: 10.5056/jnm23125.


References
1.
Vaezi M, Baker M, Richter J . Assessment of esophageal emptying post-pneumatic dilation: use of the timed barium esophagram. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999; 94(7):1802-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.01209.x. View

2.
Vaezi M . Quantitative methods to determine efficacy of treatment in achalasia. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2001; 11(2):409-24, viii-ix. View

3.
Vaezi M, Baker M, Achkar E, Richter J . Timed barium oesophagram: better predictor of long term success after pneumatic dilation in achalasia than symptom assessment. Gut. 2002; 50(6):765-70. PMC: 1773230. DOI: 10.1136/gut.50.6.765. View

4.
Eckardt V, Aignherr C, Bernhard G . Predictors of outcome in patients with achalasia treated by pneumatic dilation. Gastroenterology. 1992; 103(6):1732-8. DOI: 10.1016/0016-5085(92)91428-7. View

5.
McMahon B, Frokjaer J, Kunwald P, Liao D, Funch-Jensen P, Drewes A . The functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) for evaluation of the esophagogastric junction. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2006; 292(1):G377-84. DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.00311.2006. View