» Articles » PMID: 30728483

Refinement of Dietary Exposure Assessment Using Origin-related Scenarios

Overview
Date 2019 Feb 8
PMID 30728483
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Global sourcing of food may lead to variability in concentrations of contaminants or pesticide residues. It would be important to incorporate origin influences in dietary exposure assessment. To characterise uncertainties, substance concentrations from GFM (German Food Monitoring), chosen based on the highest CV (coefficient of variation), and food consumption from NVS II (German National Nutrition Survey II) were combined in standard scenarios. Averages or higher percentiles of non-grouped concentrations were used. Additional origin-related scenarios used concentrations grouped by origin. For bromide in tomatoes the most conservative origin-related scenario for Italian tomatoes resulted in the highest exposure of 0.015 mg/d/kg BW. The impact of origin was not covered by the conservative standard scenario (0.006 mg/d/kg BW). For ethephon in pineapples and aluminium in kiwifruits, the highest intake estimates were obtained with the conservative standard scenario resulting in 0.895 μg/d/kg BW and 0.023 mg/week/kg BW, respectively. In these two cases, standard scenarios cover origin influences but the conservative origin-related scenario based on origins with higher concentrations identifies lower exposures of 0.835 μg/d/kg BW for ethephon from African pineapples and 0.014 mg/week/kg BW for aluminium from non-EU kiwifruits. Hence, the inclusion of origin information can refine exposure assessment.

Citing Articles

Influence of the geographical origin on substance concentrations in herring as basis for dietary exposure assessments.

Fechner C, Frantzen S, Lindtner O, Mathisen G, Lillegaard I EFSA J. 2020; 17(Suppl 2):e170904.

PMID: 32626462 PMC: 7015516. DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.e170904.


Dietary exposure assessment of aluminium and cadmium from cocoa in relation to cocoa origin.

Fechner C, Greiner M, Heseker H, Lindtner O PLoS One. 2019; 14(6):e0217990.

PMID: 31166999 PMC: 6550414. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217990.

References
1.
. Safety of aluminium from dietary intake - Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Food Additives, Flavourings, Processing Aids and Food Contact Materials (AFC). EFSA J. 2023; 6(7):754. PMC: 10193631. DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2008.754. View

2.
Arnich N, Sirot V, Riviere G, Jean J, Noel L, Guerin T . Dietary exposure to trace elements and health risk assessment in the 2nd French Total Diet Study. Food Chem Toxicol. 2012; 50(7):2432-49. DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2012.04.016. View

3.
Grembecka M, Szefer P . Comparative assessment of essential and heavy metals in fruits from different geographical origins. Environ Monit Assess. 2013; 185(11):9139-60. PMC: 3787803. DOI: 10.1007/s10661-013-3242-z. View

4.
Sarvan I, Burgelt M, Lindtner O, Greiner M . [Dietary exposure assessment of substances in foods : The BfR MEAL study - the first German total diet study]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2017; 60(7):689-696. DOI: 10.1007/s00103-017-2566-1. View

5.
Gullino M, Camponogara A, Gasparrini G, Rizzo V, Clini C, Garibaldi A . Replacing Methyl Bromide for Soil Disinfestation: The ltalian Experience and Implications for Other Countries. Plant Dis. 2019; 87(9):1012-1021. DOI: 10.1094/PDIS.2003.87.9.1012. View