» Articles » PMID: 30719337

Impact of Defocus and High-Order Aberrations on Light Disturbance Measurements

Overview
Journal J Ophthalmol
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2019 Feb 6
PMID 30719337
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the impact of different levels of positive and negative defocus on light disturbance (LD) measures and to understand how high-order aberrations (HOAs) and topographic quality parameters may influence the perception of photic phenomena.

Methods: Thirty young healthy subjects (21 females and 9 males) attended this cross-sectional study. LD was evaluated with the light distortion analyzer (LDA) in natural accommodative and cycloplegic conditions with positive and negative induced defocus of 1.00D. HOAs were taken for a natural mesopic (without cycloplegia) and for fixed 5 mm (with cycloplegia) pupil size. The impact of corneal morphological parameters (SAI, SRI, and Q-value) in LD was also investigated.

Results: Positive and negative induced defocus of 1.00D significantly increased the size of LD ( < 0.010, Wilcoxon signed rank test) but not its irregularity index. Spherical-like HOAs were associated with the size of LD, while coma-like and total-like HOAs were associated with LD irregularity. Our results showed that SRI was significantly correlated with the size of the disturbance area (=0.519, =0.003, Spearman correlation) and SAI with both size (=0.502, =0.005, Spearman correlation) and irregularity (=0.371, =0.044, Spearman correlation). However, no correlation between the Q-value and LD parameters was found.

Conclusions: The uncorrected positive and negative refractive errors might increase the size of the LD, such as the spherical-like HOAs, SAI, and SRI, instead of asphericity. Coma-like and total-like HOAs and SAI may influence the perception of irregularities in the LD shape. These results might have an impact on postrefractive surgery visual performance that should be investigated.

Citing Articles

Screening of positive dysphotopsia before multifocal intraocular lens implantation.

Fernandez J, Burguera N, Rocha-de-Lossada C, Zamorano-Martin F, Rodriguez-Vallejo M Indian J Ophthalmol. 2024; 72(Suppl 2):S211-S217.

PMID: 38271416 PMC: 11624639. DOI: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_1038_23.


Pupil size effect on binocular summation for visual acuity and light disturbance.

Martino F, Pereira-da-Mota A, Amorim-de-Sousa A, Castro-Torres J, Gonzalez-Meijome J Int Ophthalmol. 2022; 43(7):2183-2195.

PMID: 36512297 DOI: 10.1007/s10792-022-02614-w.


Short-term tear film stability, optical quality and visual performance in two dual-focus contact lenses for myopia control with different optical designs.

Garcia-Marques J, Macedo-De-Araujo R, McAlinden C, Faria-Ribeiro M, Cervino A, Gonzalez-Meijome J Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2022; 42(5):1062-1073.

PMID: 35801815 PMC: 9540637. DOI: 10.1111/opo.13024.


Comparative analysis of the clinical outcomes between wavefront-guided and conventional femtosecond LASIK in myopia and myopia astigmatism.

Gui X, Zhang R, Li S, Zhao N, Zhang H, Zhou Y Int J Ophthalmol. 2021; 14(10):1581-1588.

PMID: 34667736 PMC: 8481996. DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2021.10.16.


How many challenges we may encounter in anterior megalophthalmos with white cataract: a case report.

Miao A, Zhang K, Yu J, He W, Lu Y, Zhu X BMC Ophthalmol. 2019; 19(1):122.

PMID: 31146719 PMC: 6543662. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-019-1133-y.

References
1.
Maini R, Keeffe J, Weih L, McCarty C, Taylor H . Correction of refractive error in the Victorian population: the feasibility of "off the shelf" spectacles. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001; 85(11):1283-6. PMC: 1723768. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.85.11.1283. View

2.
Villegas E, Gonzalez C, Bourdoncle B, Bonnin T, Artal P . Correlation between optical and psychophysical parameters as a function of defocus. Optom Vis Sci. 2002; 79(1):60-7. DOI: 10.1097/00006324-200201000-00014. View

3.
Cheng X, Bradley A, Hong X, Thibos L . Relationship between refractive error and monochromatic aberrations of the eye. Optom Vis Sci. 2003; 80(1):43-9. DOI: 10.1097/00006324-200301000-00007. View

4.
Marcos S . Image quality of the human eye. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2003; 43(2):43-62. DOI: 10.1097/00004397-200343020-00007. View

5.
Applegate R, Marsack J, Ramos R, Sarver E . Interaction between aberrations to improve or reduce visual performance. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003; 29(8):1487-95. DOI: 10.1016/s0886-3350(03)00334-1. View