» Articles » PMID: 30713130

Automatic Breast and Fibroglandular Tissue Segmentation in Breast MRI Using Deep Learning by a Fully-Convolutional Residual Neural Network U-Net

Overview
Journal Acad Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2019 Feb 5
PMID 30713130
Citations 36
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Rationale And Objectives: Breast segmentation using the U-net architecture was implemented and tested in independent validation datasets to quantify fibroglandular tissue volume in breast MRI.

Materials And Methods: Two datasets were used. The training set was MRI of 286 patients with unilateral breast cancer. The segmentation was done on the contralateral normal breasts. The ground truth for the breast and fibroglandular tissue (FGT) was obtained by using a template-based segmentation method. The U-net deep learning algorithm was implemented to analyze the training set, and the final model was obtained using 10-fold cross-validation. The independent validation set was MRI of 28 normal volunteers acquired using four different MR scanners. Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), voxel-based accuracy, and Pearson's correlation were used to evaluate the performance.

Results: For the 10-fold cross-validation in the initial training set of 286 patients, the DSC range was 0.83-0.98 (mean 0.95 ± 0.02) for breast and 0.73-0.97 (mean 0.91 ± 0.03) for FGT; and the accuracy range was 0.92-0.99 (mean 0.98 ± 0.01) for breast and 0.87-0.99 (mean 0.97 ± 0.01) for FGT. For the entire 224 testing breasts of the 28 normal volunteers in the validation datasets, the mean DSC was 0.86 ± 0.05 for breast, 0.83 ± 0.06 for FGT; and the mean accuracy was 0.94 ± 0.03 for breast and 0.93 ± 0.04 for FGT. The testing results for MRI acquired using four different scanners were comparable.

Conclusion: Deep learning based on the U-net algorithm can achieve accurate segmentation results for the breast and FGT on MRI. It may provide a reliable and efficient method to process large number of MR images for quantitative analysis of breast density.

Citing Articles

Comparative analysis of deep learning architectures for breast region segmentation with a novel breast boundary proposal.

Narimani S, Roth Hoff S, Daehli Kurz K, Gjesdal K, Geisler J, Grovik E Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):8806.

PMID: 40087354 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-92863-3.


Impact of menopause and age on breast density and background parenchymal enhancement in dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Kuling G, Brooks J, Curpen B, Warner E, Martel A J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2025; 12(Suppl 2):S22002.

PMID: 40078986 PMC: 11894108. DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.12.S2.S22002.


Advances in analytical approaches for background parenchymal enhancement in predicting breast tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A systematic review.

Thomas J, Malla L, Shibwabo B PLoS One. 2025; 20(3):e0317240.

PMID: 40053513 PMC: 11888135. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317240.


The top 100 most-cited articles on artificial intelligence in breast radiology: a bibliometric analysis.

Singh S, Healy N Insights Imaging. 2024; 15(1):297.

PMID: 39666106 PMC: 11638451. DOI: 10.1186/s13244-024-01869-4.


Performance of an AI-powered visualization software platform for precision surgery in breast cancer patients.

Weitz M, Pfeiffer J, Patel S, Biancalana M, Pekis A, Kannan V NPJ Breast Cancer. 2024; 10(1):98.

PMID: 39543194 PMC: 11564706. DOI: 10.1038/s41523-024-00696-6.


References
1.
Kuhl C, Schrading S, Strobel K, Schild H, Hilgers R, Bieling H . Abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): first postcontrast subtracted images and maximum-intensity projection-a novel approach to breast cancer screening with MRI. J Clin Oncol. 2014; 32(22):2304-10. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2013.52.5386. View

2.
Kallenberg M, Petersen K, Nielsen M, Ng A, Diao P, Igel C . Unsupervised Deep Learning Applied to Breast Density Segmentation and Mammographic Risk Scoring. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2016; 35(5):1322-1331. DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2016.2532122. View

3.
Ertas G, Doran S, Leach M . A computerized volumetric segmentation method applicable to multi-centre MRI data to support computer-aided breast tissue analysis, density assessment and lesion localization. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2016; 55(1):57-68. PMC: 5222930. DOI: 10.1007/s11517-016-1484-y. View

4.
Lin M, Chen J, Wang X, Chan S, Chen S, Su M . Template-based automatic breast segmentation on MRI by excluding the chest region. Med Phys. 2013; 40(12):122301. PMC: 3843758. DOI: 10.1118/1.4828837. View

5.
Lin M, Chan S, Chen J, Chang D, Nie K, Chen S . A new bias field correction method combining N3 and FCM for improved segmentation of breast density on MRI. Med Phys. 2011; 38(1):5-14. PMC: 3017578. DOI: 10.1118/1.3519869. View