» Articles » PMID: 30699105

Mechanistic Framework Predicts Drug-class Specific Utility of Antiretrovirals for HIV Prophylaxis

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2019 Jan 31
PMID 30699105
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Currently, there is no effective vaccine to halt HIV transmission. However, pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with the drug combination Truvada can substantially decrease HIV transmission in individuals at risk. Despite its benefits, Truvada-based PrEP is expensive and needs to be taken once-daily, which often leads to inadequate adherence and incomplete protection. These deficits may be overcome by next-generation PrEP regimen, including currently investigated long-acting formulations, or patent-expired drugs. However, poor translatability of animal- and ex vivo/in vitro experiments, and the necessity to conduct long-term (several years) human trials involving considerable sample sizes (N>1000 individuals) are major obstacles to rationalize drug-candidate selection. We developed a prophylaxis modelling tool that mechanistically considers the mode-of-action of all available drugs. We used the tool to screen antivirals for their prophylactic utility and identify lower bound effective concentrations that can guide dose selection in PrEP trials. While in vitro measurable drug potency usually guides PrEP trial design, we found that it may over-predict PrEP potency for all drug classes except reverse transcriptase inhibitors. While most drugs displayed graded concentration-prophylaxis profiles, protease inhibitors tended to switch between none- and complete protection. While several treatment-approved drugs could be ruled out as PrEP candidates based on lack-of-prophylactic efficacy, darunavir, efavirenz, nevirapine, etravirine and rilpivirine could more potently prevent infection than existing PrEP regimen (Truvada). Notably, some drugs from this candidate set are patent-expired and currently neglected for PrEP repurposing. A next step is to further trim this candidate set by ruling out compounds with ominous safety profiles, to assess different administration schemes in silico and to test the remaining candidates in human trials.

Citing Articles

Modeling of HIV-1 prophylactic efficacy and toxicity with islatravir shows non-superiority for oral dosing, but promise as a subcutaneous implant.

Kim H, Zhang L, Hendrix C, Haberer J, von Kleist M CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2024; 13(10):1693-1706.

PMID: 39164932 PMC: 11494919. DOI: 10.1002/psp4.13212.


Model-based predictions of protective HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis adherence levels in cisgender women.

Zhang L, Iannuzzi S, Chaturvedula A, Irungu E, Haberer J, Hendrix C Nat Med. 2023; 29(11):2753-2762.

PMID: 37957377 PMC: 10667095. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-023-02615-x.


Validation and clinical application of a method to quantify efavirenz in cervicovaginal secretions from flocked swabs using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.

Olagunju A, Nwogu J, Eniayewu O, Atoyebi S, Amara A, Kpamor J Wellcome Open Res. 2022; 6:246.

PMID: 36034058 PMC: 9379332. DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17202.3.


Numerical approaches for the rapid analysis of prophylactic efficacy against HIV with arbitrary drug-dosing schemes.

Zhang L, Wang J, von Kleist M PLoS Comput Biol. 2021; 17(12):e1009295.

PMID: 34941864 PMC: 8741042. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009295.


Success of prophylactic antiviral therapy for SARS-CoV-2: Predicted critical efficacies and impact of different drug-specific mechanisms of action.

Czuppon P, Debarre F, Goncalves A, Tenaillon O, Perelson A, Guedj J PLoS Comput Biol. 2021; 17(3):e1008752.

PMID: 33647008 PMC: 7951973. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008752.


References
1.
Stafford M, Corey L, Cao Y, Daar E, Ho D, Perelson A . Modeling plasma virus concentration during primary HIV infection. J Theor Biol. 2000; 203(3):285-301. DOI: 10.1006/jtbi.2000.1076. View

2.
Quinn T, Wawer M, Sewankambo N, Serwadda D, Li C, Wabwire-Mangen F . Viral load and heterosexual transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1. Rakai Project Study Group. N Engl J Med. 2000; 342(13):921-9. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM200003303421303. View

3.
Letendre S, Capparelli E, Ellis R, McCutchan J . Indinavir population pharmacokinetics in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid. The HIV Neurobehavioral Research Center Group. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000; 44(8):2173-5. PMC: 90032. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.44.8.2173-2175.2000. View

4.
Holladay J, Dewey M, Michniak B, Wiltshire H, Halberg D, Weigl P . Elevated alpha-1-acid glycoprotein reduces the volume of distribution and systemic clearance of saquinavir. Drug Metab Dispos. 2001; 29(3):299-303. View

5.
Veldkamp A, van Heeswijk R, Mulder J, Meenhorst P, Schreij G, van der Geest S . Steady-state pharmacokinetics of twice-daily dosing of saquinavir plus ritonavir in HIV-1-infected individuals. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2001; 27(4):344-9. DOI: 10.1097/00126334-200108010-00004. View