» Articles » PMID: 30690717

Efficient Methods for Signal Detection from Correlated Adverse Events in Clinical Trials

Overview
Journal Biometrics
Specialty Public Health
Date 2019 Jan 29
PMID 30690717
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

It is an important and yet challenging task to identify true signals from many adverse events that may be reported during the course of a clinical trial. One unique feature of drug safety data from clinical trials, unlike data from post-marketing spontaneous reporting, is that many types of adverse events are reported by only very few patients leading to rare events. Due to the limited study size, the p-values of testing whether the rate is higher in the treatment group across all types of adverse events are in general not uniformly distributed under the null hypothesis that there is no difference between the treatment group and the placebo group. A consequence is that typically fewer than percent of the hypotheses are rejected under the null at the nominal significance level of . The other challenge is multiplicity control. Adverse events from the same body system may be correlated. There may also be correlations between adverse events from different body systems. To tackle these challenging issues, we develop Monte-Carlo-based methods for the signal identification from patient-reported adverse events in clinical trials. The proposed methodologies account for the rare events and arbitrary correlation structures among adverse events within and/or between body systems. Extensive simulation studies demonstrate that the proposed method can accurately control the family-wise error rate and is more powerful than existing methods under many practical situations. Application to two real examples is provided.

Citing Articles

Statistical methods leveraging the hierarchical structure of adverse events for signal detection in clinical trials: a scoping review of the methodological literature.

de Abreu Nunes L, Hooper R, McGettigan P, Phillips R BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024; 24(1):253.

PMID: 39468481 PMC: 11514772. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-024-02369-1.


BAHAMA: A Bayesian Hierarchical Model for the Detection of MedDRA-Coded Adverse Events in Randomized Controlled Trials.

Revers A, Hof M, Zwinderman A Drug Saf. 2022; 45(9):961-970.

PMID: 35840802 PMC: 9402776. DOI: 10.1007/s40264-022-01208-w.


Expedited Safety Reporting to Sponsors Through the Implementation of an Alert System for Clinical Trial Management at an Academic Medical Center: Retrospective Design Study.

Park Y, Koo H, Yoon Y, Park S, Lim Y, Baek S JMIR Med Inform. 2020; 8(2):e14379.

PMID: 32130175 PMC: 7068534. DOI: 10.2196/14379.

References
1.
Miettinen O, Nurminen M . Comparative analysis of two rates. Stat Med. 1985; 4(2):213-26. DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780040211. View

2.
Huang L, Zalkikar J, Tiwari R . Likelihood ratio test-based method for signal detection in drug classes using FDA's AERS database. J Biopharm Stat. 2013; 23(1):178-200. DOI: 10.1080/10543406.2013.736810. View

3.
Price K, Xia H, Lakshminarayanan M, Madigan D, Manner D, Scott J . Bayesian methods for design and analysis of safety trials. Pharm Stat. 2013; 13(1):13-24. DOI: 10.1002/pst.1586. View

4.
Keller M, Montgomery S, Ball W, Morrison M, Snavely D, Liu G . Lack of efficacy of the substance p (neurokinin1 receptor) antagonist aprepitant in the treatment of major depressive disorder. Biol Psychiatry. 2005; 59(3):216-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.07.013. View

5.
Diao G, Vidyashankar A . Assessing genome-wide statistical significance for large p small n problems. Genetics. 2013; 194(3):781-3. PMC: 3697980. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.113.150896. View