» Articles » PMID: 30688005

Behavioral Flexibility in a Mouse Model for Obsessive-compulsive Disorder: Impaired Pavlovian Reversal Learning in SAPAP3 Mutants

Overview
Date 2019 Jan 29
PMID 30688005
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is characterized by obsessive thinking, compulsive behavior and anxiety, and is often accompanied by cognitive deficits. The neuropathology of OCD involves dysregulation of cortical-striatal circuits. Similar to OCD patients, SAPAP3 knockout mice 3 (SAPAP3 ) exhibit compulsive behavior (grooming), anxiety and dysregulated cortical-striatal function. However, it is unknown whether SAPAP3 display cognitive deficits and how these different behavioral traits relate to one another. SAPAP3 and wild-type (WT) littermates were trained in a Pavlovian conditioning task pairing visual cues with the delivery of sucrose solution. After mice learned to discriminate between a reward-predicting conditioned stimulus (CS+) and a non-reward stimulus (CS-), contingencies were reversed (CS+ became CS- and vice versa). Additionally, we assessed grooming, anxiety and general activity. SAPAP3 acquired Pavlovian approach behavior similarly to WT, albeit less vigorously and with a different strategy. However, unlike WT, SAPAP3 were unable to adapt their behavior after contingency reversal, exemplified by a lack of re-establishing CS+ approach behavior (sign tracking). Surprisingly, such behavioral inflexibility, decreased vigor, compulsive grooming and anxiety were unrelated. This study shows that SAPAP3 are capable of Pavlovian learning, but lack flexibility to adapt associated conditioned approach behavior. Thus, SAPAP3 not only display compulsive-like behavior and anxiety, but also cognitive deficits, confirming and extending the validity of SAPAP3 as a suitable model for the study of OCD. The observation that compulsive-like behavior, anxiety and behavioral inflexibility were unrelated suggests a non-causal relationship between these traits and may be of clinical relevance for the treatment of OCD.

Citing Articles

Late development of OCD-like phenotypes in Dlgap1 knockout mice.

Minagawa K, Hayakawa T, Akimoto H, Nagashima T, Takahashi Y, Asai S Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2024; 242(1):215-231.

PMID: 39177810 PMC: 11742909. DOI: 10.1007/s00213-024-06668-9.


The genetics of trichotillomania and excoriation disorder: A systematic review.

Reid M, Lin A, Farhat L, Fernandez T, Olfson E Compr Psychiatry. 2024; 133:152506.

PMID: 38833896 PMC: 11513794. DOI: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2024.152506.


A molecularly defined orbitofrontal cortical neuron population controls compulsive-like behavior, but not inflexible choice or habit.

Yount S, Wang S, Allen A, Shapiro L, Butkovich L, Gourley S Prog Neurobiol. 2024; 238:102632.

PMID: 38821345 PMC: 11332912. DOI: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2024.102632.


Opening new vistas on obsessive-compulsive disorder with the observing response task.

Pickenhan L, Milton A Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2024; 24(2):249-265.

PMID: 38316708 PMC: 11039534. DOI: 10.3758/s13415-023-01153-w.


The role of sex on sign-tracking acquisition and outcome devaluation sensitivity in Long Evans rats.

Bien E, Smith K Behav Brain Res. 2023; 455:114656.

PMID: 37683812 PMC: 10591930. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2023.114656.


References
1.
Bussey T, Everitt B, Robbins T . Dissociable effects of cingulate and medial frontal cortex lesions on stimulus-reward learning using a novel Pavlovian autoshaping procedure for the rat: implications for the neurobiology of emotion. Behav Neurosci. 1998; 111(5):908-19. DOI: 10.1037//0735-7044.111.5.908. View

2.
Flagel S, Robinson T . Neurobiological Basis of Individual Variation in Stimulus-Reward Learning. Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2017; 13:178-185. PMC: 5486979. DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.12.004. View

3.
Ting J, Feng G . Neurobiology of obsessive-compulsive disorder: insights into neural circuitry dysfunction through mouse genetics. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2011; 21(6):842-8. PMC: 3192923. DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2011.04.010. View

4.
Izquierdo A, Brigman J, Radke A, Rudebeck P, Holmes A . The neural basis of reversal learning: An updated perspective. Neuroscience. 2016; 345:12-26. PMC: 5018909. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.03.021. View

5.
Pinhal C, van den Boom B, Santana-Kragelund F, Fellinger L, Bech P, Hamelink R . Differential Effects of Deep Brain Stimulation of the Internal Capsule and the Striatum on Excessive Grooming in Sapap3 Mutant Mice. Biol Psychiatry. 2018; 84(12):917-925. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2018.05.011. View