Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Validation of the Proposed Criteria and Proposal of a Scoring System for Real-time Tumor Grading

Overview

Journal World J Urol

Specialty Urology

Date 2019 Jan 27

PMID 30684035

Citations 10

Authors

J E Freund

E I M L Liem

C D Savci-Heijink

J Baard

G M Kamphuis

J J M C H de la Rosette

D M de Bruin

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: Confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) is a fluorescence-based fiber-optic imaging technique with the potential for intraoperative grading of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). This study aims to (1) investigate the prevalence of the previously proposed CLE criteria for bladder cancer in papillary UTUC, (2) estimate the diagnostic value of CLE for UTUC grading and (3) propose a scoring system for a more quantifiable approach of CLE-based grading of UTUC.

Materials And Methods: Ureteroscopic CLE was performed in patients with UTUC. Following CLE imaging, co-localized biopsies were taken for histopathologic comparison. Postoperatively, two blinded raters assessed the CLE images.

Results: Fifty-three papillary UTUCs (34 low grade and 19 high grade) were imaged with CLE in 36 patients. All the previously described CLE criteria were identifiable in varying proportions. After excluding 10 non-diagnostic recordings (5 low grade and 5 high grade) due to insufficient image quality, the histopathologic grade was correctly identified with CLE in 26 low-grade UTUCs (90%) and in 12 high-grade UTUCs (86%). The most prevalent CLE criteria with the highest diagnostic potential were cellular organization, morphology and cohesiveness of cells. A scoring system was proposed with these criteria, which yielded similar diagnostic accuracies.

Conclusions: Based on the previously proposed criteria, CLE enables accurate grading of papillary UTUC at a non-diagnostic rate of 19%. The most prevalent CLE criteria with the highest diagnostic potential for grading of papillary UTUC are cellular organization, morphology and cohesiveness of cells. The proposed scoring system may simplify the assessment of CLE images for UTUC grading but external validation is required.

Citing Articles

The Recurrence Rates at Three Years for the Conservatively Managed UTUC Cases Using NBI-Assisted Flexible Ureteroscopy and Holmium Laser Vaporization.

Geavlete P, Iordache V, Multescu R, Paunescu A, Ene C, Popescu R Medicina (Kaunas). 2025; 60(12.

PMID: 39768793 PMC: 11677521. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60121911.

Prospective Analysis of Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy for Assessment of the Resection Bed for Bladder Tumor.

de Ruiter B, Freund J, Dilara Savci-Heijink C, van Hattum J, Remmelink M, de Reijke T Eur Urol Open Sci. 2024; 71:57-62.

PMID: 39703742 PMC: 11656091. DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.11.007.

Diagnostic status and new explorations in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a literature review.

Shan Z, Deng X, Yang L, Zhang G Transl Androl Urol. 2024; 13(11):2570-2586.

PMID: 39698558 PMC: 11650341. DOI: 10.21037/tau-24-326.

Diagnosing upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A review of the role of diagnostic ureteroscopy and novel developments over last two decades.

Gravestock P, Cullum D, Somani B, Veeratterapillay R Asian J Urol. 2024; 11(2):242-252.

PMID: 38680592 PMC: 11053284. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur.2022.08.003.

Fluorescence Confocal Microscopy in Urological Malignancies: Current Applications and Future Perspectives.

Ongaro L, Rossin G, Biasatti A, Pacini M, Rizzo M, Traunero F Life (Basel). 2023; 13(12).

PMID: 38137902 PMC: 10744992. DOI: 10.3390/life13122301.

References

McHugh M . Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012; 22(3):276-82. PMC: 3900052. View

Liem E, Freund J, Savci-Heijink C, de la Rosette J, Kamphuis G, Baard J . Validation of Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy Features of Bladder Cancer: The Next Step Towards Real-time Histologic Grading. Eur Urol Focus. 2018; 6(1):81-87. DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2018.07.012. View

Cheng L, NEUMANN R, Nehra A, Spotts B, Weaver A, Bostwick D . Cancer heterogeneity and its biologic implications in the grading of urothelial carcinoma. Cancer. 2000; 88(7):1663-70. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(20000401)88:7<1663::aid-cncr21>3.0.co;2-8. View

Vickers A, Elkin E . Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models. Med Decis Making. 2006; 26(6):565-74. PMC: 2577036. DOI: 10.1177/0272989X06295361. View

Breda A, Territo A, Guttilla A, Sanguedolce F, Manfredi M, Quaresima L . Correlation Between Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy (Cellvizio) and Histological Grading of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Step Forward for a Better Selection of Patients Suitable for Conservative Management. Eur Urol Focus. 2017; 4(6):954-959. DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.05.008. View

Roupret M, Colin P, Yates D . A new proposal to risk stratify urothelial carcinomas of the upper urinary tract (UTUCs) in a predefinitive treatment setting: low-risk versus high-risk UTUCs. Eur Urol. 2013; 66(2):181-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.12.007. View

Keeley F, Kulp D, Bibbo M, McCue P, Bagley D . Diagnostic accuracy of ureteroscopic biopsy in upper tract transitional cell carcinoma. J Urol. 1997; 157(1):33-7. View

Villa L, Cloutier J, Cote J, Salonia A, Montorsi F, Traxer O . Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy in the Management of Endoscopically Treated Upper Urinary Tract Transitional Cell Carcinoma: Preliminary Data. J Endourol. 2015; 30(2):237-42. DOI: 10.1089/end.2015.0644. View

Margolin E, Matulay J, Li G, Meng X, Chao B, Vijay V . Discordance between Ureteroscopic Biopsy and Final Pathology for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. J Urol. 2018; 199(6):1440-1445. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.02.002. View

10.

Bossuyt P, Irwig L, Craig J, Glasziou P . Comparative accuracy: assessing new tests against existing diagnostic pathways. BMJ. 2006; 332(7549):1089-92. PMC: 1458557. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.332.7549.1089. View

11.

Grobman W, Stamilio D . Methods of clinical prediction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 194(3):888-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.09.002. View

12.

May M, Brookman-Amissah S, Roigas J, Hartmann A, Storkel S, Kristiansen G . Prognostic accuracy of individual uropathologists in noninvasive urinary bladder carcinoma: a multicentre study comparing the 1973 and 2004 World Health Organisation classifications. Eur Urol. 2009; 57(5):850-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.03.052. View

13.

Adams W, Wu K, Liu J, Hsiao S, Jensen K, Liao J . Comparison of 2.6- and 1.4-mm imaging probes for confocal laser endomicroscopy of the urinary tract. J Endourol. 2011; 25(6):917-21. DOI: 10.1089/end.2010.0686. View

14.

Seisen T, Peyronnet B, Dominguez-Escrig J, Bruins H, Yuan C, Babjuk M . Oncologic Outcomes of Kidney-sparing Surgery Versus Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review by the EAU Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel. Eur Urol. 2016; 70(6):1052-1068. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.07.014. View

15.

Chang T, Liu J, Hsiao S, Pan Y, Mach K, Leppert J . Interobserver agreement of confocal laser endomicroscopy for bladder cancer. J Endourol. 2012; 27(5):598-603. PMC: 3643225. DOI: 10.1089/end.2012.0549. View

16.

Bui D, Mach K, Zlatev D, Rouse R, Leppert J, Liao J . A Pilot Study of In Vivo Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. J Endourol. 2015; 29(12):1418-23. PMC: 4677518. DOI: 10.1089/end.2015.0523. View

17.

Liem E, Freund J, Baard J, de Bruin D, Pes M, Dilara Savci-Heijink C . Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy for the Diagnosis of Urothelial Carcinoma in the Bladder and the Upper Urinary Tract: Protocols for Two Prospective Explorative Studies. JMIR Res Protoc. 2018; 7(2):e34. PMC: 5822038. DOI: 10.2196/resprot.8862. View

18.

Smith A, Stephenson A, Lane B, Larson B, Thomas A, Gong M . Inadequacy of biopsy for diagnosis of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: implications for conservative management. Urology. 2011; 78(1):82-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.02.038. View

19.

Straub J, Strittmatter F, Karl A, Stief C, Tritschler S . Ureterorenoscopic biopsy and urinary cytology according to the 2004 WHO classification underestimate tumor grading in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. Urol Oncol. 2012; 31(7):1166-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2011.12.021. View

20.

Wang J, Tollefson M, Krambeck A, Trost L, Thompson R . High rate of pathologic upgrading at nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Urology. 2012; 79(3):615-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.11.049. View