» Articles » PMID: 26413927

A Pilot Study of In Vivo Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma

Overview
Journal J Endourol
Publisher Mary Ann Liebert
Date 2015 Sep 29
PMID 26413927
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Tissue diagnosis of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is limited by variance in tumor sampling by standard ureteroscopic biopsy. Optical imaging technologies can potentially improve UTUC diagnosis, surveillance, and endoscopic treatment. We previously demonstrated in vivo optical biopsy of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder using confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE). In this study, we evaluated a new 0.85-mm imaging probe in the upper urinary tract and demonstrated feasibility and compatibility with standard ureteroscopes to achieve in vivo optical biopsy of UTUC.

Materials And Methods: Fourteen patients scheduled for ureteroscopy of suspected upper tract lesions or surveillance of UTUC were recruited. After intravenous (IV) administration of fluorescein, CLE was performed using a 0.85-mm-diameter imaging probe inserted through the working channel of standard ureteroscopes. Acquired confocal video sequences were reviewed and analyzed. A mosaicing algorithm was used to compile a series of images into a single larger composite image. Processed CLE images were compared with standard histopathologic analysis.

Results: Optical biopsy of the UTUC using CLE was effectively achieved during standard ureteroscopy. There were no adverse events related to IV fluorescein administration or image acquisition. Confocal imaging of UTUC showed characteristic features similar to urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, including papillary structure, fibrovascular stalks, and pleomorphism. Lamina propria in normal areas of the renal pelvis and ureter was also identified.

Conclusions: We report an initial feasibility of CLE of UTUC. Pending further clinical investigation, CLE may become a useful adjunct to ureteroscopic biopsy, endoscopic ablation, and surveillance of UTUC.

Citing Articles

New Trends and Future Perspectives in the Diagnosis of Urothelial Carcinoma: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature.

Panagiotis M, Ioannis G, Vasilleios K, Nikolaos P, Ioannis S, Sotirios C Medicina (Kaunas). 2025; 61(1).

PMID: 39859052 PMC: 11767069. DOI: 10.3390/medicina61010071.


Diagnostic status and new explorations in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a literature review.

Shan Z, Deng X, Yang L, Zhang G Transl Androl Urol. 2024; 13(11):2570-2586.

PMID: 39698558 PMC: 11650341. DOI: 10.21037/tau-24-326.


Diagnosing upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A review of the role of diagnostic ureteroscopy and novel developments over last two decades.

Gravestock P, Cullum D, Somani B, Veeratterapillay R Asian J Urol. 2024; 11(2):242-252.

PMID: 38680592 PMC: 11053284. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur.2022.08.003.


Fluorescence Confocal Microscopy in Urological Malignancies: Current Applications and Future Perspectives.

Ongaro L, Rossin G, Biasatti A, Pacini M, Rizzo M, Traunero F Life (Basel). 2023; 13(12).

PMID: 38137902 PMC: 10744992. DOI: 10.3390/life13122301.


Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC) Diagnosis and Risk Stratification: A Comprehensive Review.

Bitaraf M, Ghafoori Yazdi M, Amini E Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(20).

PMID: 37894354 PMC: 10605461. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15204987.


References
1.
Roupret M, Traxer O, Tligui M, Conort P, Chartier-Kastler E, Richard F . Upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma: recurrence rate after percutaneous endoscopic resection. Eur Urol. 2006; 51(3):709-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.07.019. View

2.
Tavora F, Fajardo D, Lee T, Lotan T, Miller J, Miyamoto H . Small endoscopic biopsies of the ureter and renal pelvis: pathologic pitfalls. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009; 33(10):1540-6. DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181aec42a. View

3.
Konda V, Meining A, Jamil L, Giovannini M, Hwang J, Wallace M . A pilot study of in vivo identification of pancreatic cystic neoplasms with needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy under endosonographic guidance. Endoscopy. 2013; 45(12):1006-13. DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1344714. View

4.
Bus M, Muller B, de Bruin D, Faber D, Kamphuis G, van Leeuwen T . Volumetric in vivo visualization of upper urinary tract tumors using optical coherence tomography: a pilot study. J Urol. 2013; 190(6):2236-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.08.006. View

5.
Straub J, Strittmatter F, Karl A, Stief C, Tritschler S . Ureterorenoscopic biopsy and urinary cytology according to the 2004 WHO classification underestimate tumor grading in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. Urol Oncol. 2012; 31(7):1166-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2011.12.021. View