» Articles » PMID: 30683990

Normative Volume Measurements of the Fetal Intra-cranial Compartments Using 3D Volume in Utero MR Imaging

Overview
Journal Eur Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2019 Jan 27
PMID 30683990
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To describe the normal linear measurements of the skull (bi-parietal diameter and occipito-frontal diameter) and intracranial volumes (ventricular volume, brain parenchymal volume, extra-axial volume and total intra-cranial volume) in normal fetuses.

Materials And Methods: We recruited pregnant women from low-risk pregnancies whose fetuses had normal ultrasound and in utero MR studies. All volunteers had in utero MR imaging on the same 1.5T MR scanner with a protocol consisting of routine and 3D steady-state volume imaging of the fetal brain. Linear measurements of the skull were made using the volume imaging. The 3D volume imaging also was manually segmented to delineate the intracranial compartments described above to determine quantitative values for each.

Results: Two hundred normal fetuses were studied with gestational ages between 18 and 37 weeks. The linear skull measurements made on in utero MR imaging closely correlate with published data from ultrasonography. The intracranial volume data is presented as graphs and as tabular summaries of 3rd, 10th, 50th, 90th and 97th centiles.

Conclusion: It is now possible to measure the volumes of the intracranial compartments in individual fetuses using ultrafast in utero MR techniques.

Key Points: • There are limitations in using the skull size of the fetus to comment on the state of the fetal brain. • Volumes for the intracranial compartments are presented, based on in utero MR imaging of the fetal brain between 18 and 37 weeks gestational age. • Those normative values can be used to assess fetuses with known or suspected structural brain abnormalities and may assist the differential diagnosis provided by visual assessment of routine iuMR studies.

Citing Articles

Analysis of automatic fetal intracranial volume (ICV) measurement based on the optimized ultrasound Smart ICV method at 16-34 weeks of gestation.

Zhou M, Li X, Huang T, Wang M, Giorgio A Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024; 14(12):9361-9373.

PMID: 39698635 PMC: 11651943. DOI: 10.21037/qims-24-1379.


Fetal Brain Growth in the Early Second Trimester.

Cortes-Albornoz M, Calixto C, Bedoya M, Didier R, Estroff J, Jaimes C AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2023; 44(12):1440-1444.

PMID: 37973183 PMC: 10714857. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A8051.


Automatic biometry of fetal brain MRIs using deep and machine learning techniques.

She J, Huang H, Ye Z, Huang W, Sun Y, Liu C Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):17860.

PMID: 37857681 PMC: 10587162. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-43867-4.


Sex differences in fetal intracranial volumes assessed by in utero MR imaging.

Griffiths P, Jarvis D, Mooney C, Campbell M Biol Sex Differ. 2023; 14(1):13.

PMID: 36922874 PMC: 10015831. DOI: 10.1186/s13293-023-00497-9.


Effective Approaches to Fetal Brain Segmentation in MRI and Gestational Age Estimation by Utilizing a Multiview Deep Inception Residual Network and Radiomics.

Mazher M, Qayyum A, Puig D, Abdel-Nasser M Entropy (Basel). 2022; 24(12).

PMID: 36554113 PMC: 9778347. DOI: 10.3390/e24121708.


References
1.
Cole T, Green P . Smoothing reference centile curves: the LMS method and penalized likelihood. Stat Med. 1992; 11(10):1305-19. DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780111005. View

2.
Kyriakopoulou V, Vatansever D, Davidson A, Patkee P, Elkommos S, Chew A . Normative biometry of the fetal brain using magnetic resonance imaging. Brain Struct Funct. 2016; 222(5):2295-2307. PMC: 5504265. DOI: 10.1007/s00429-016-1342-6. View

3.
Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Finet J, Fillion-Robin J, Pujol S . 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn Reson Imaging. 2012; 30(9):1323-41. PMC: 3466397. DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001. View

4.
Keraudren K, Kuklisova-Murgasova M, Kyriakopoulou V, Malamateniou C, Rutherford M, Kainz B . Automated fetal brain segmentation from 2D MRI slices for motion correction. Neuroimage. 2014; 101:633-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.07.023. View

5.
Pan H, Cole T . A comparison of goodness of fit tests for age-related reference ranges. Stat Med. 2004; 23(11):1749-65. DOI: 10.1002/sim.1692. View