» Articles » PMID: 30666550

ICECAP-O, the Current State of Play: a Systematic Review of Studies Reporting the Psychometric Properties and Use of the Instrument over the Decade Since Its Publication

Overview
Journal Qual Life Res
Date 2019 Jan 23
PMID 30666550
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: A paper reporting the development of the ICECAP-O was published in 2006. Since then, there has been increasing interest in the use of capability-based measures within health economics and the ICECAP-O has been suggested for use in economic evaluation by decision-making bodies in the Netherlands and UK.

Methods: A systematic review of studies published between January 2006 and October 2018 which have assessed the psychometric properties of ICECAP-O or utilised the measure within economic evaluation.

Results: Twenty-four studies explored the psychometric properties of ICECAP-O and 21 have utilised the measure within economic evaluation; one study reported psychometric properties as well as utilising the measure within economic evaluation. The ICECAP-O has good construct validity and responsiveness, but there is evidence of some issues relating to content validity. In the context of economic evaluation, the ICECAP-O has, to date, mainly been included as a secondary economic measure and the reporting of results is brief with minimal detail and often no discussion. Five of the economic evaluation studies combined scores from ICECAP-O with time, but each used different terminology to describe this result.

Conclusion: Focus, in terms of publications, appears to have shifted now from assessment of psychometric properties to the utilisation of the ICECAP-O within economic evaluation. Further research is needed with respect to a decision-rule for the ICECAP measures. This additional research should also guide users in terms of appropriate analysis, terminology and presentation of results, which are in-keeping with the conceptual framework underpinning the ICECAP-O.

Citing Articles

Assessing the feasibility of measuring residents' quality of life in English care homes and the construct validity and internal consistency of measures completed by staff proxy: a cross-sectional study.

Towers A, Rand S, Allan S, Webster L, Palmer S, Carroll R BMJ Open. 2025; 15(1):e090684.

PMID: 39880439 PMC: 11781126. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090684.


Evaluating the web-based 'Partner in Balance' program for informal caregivers of people with Huntington's disease: A pilot study.

Daemen M, Boots L, Oosterloo M, de Vugt M, Duits A Internet Interv. 2024; 38:100782.

PMID: 39512474 PMC: 11541815. DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2024.100782.


Measuring what matters to older persons for active living: part I content development for the OPAL measure across four countries.

Mayo N, Auais M, Barclay R, Branin J, Dawes H, Korfage I Qual Life Res. 2024; 33(10):2649-2659.

PMID: 38967870 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-024-03714-z.


Population normative data for OxCAP-MH capability scores.

Balazs P, Laszewska A, Simon J, Brodszky V Eur J Health Econ. 2024; 26(2):223-231.

PMID: 38789619 PMC: 11889034. DOI: 10.1007/s10198-024-01696-w.


Exploratory factor analysis and Rasch analysis to assess the structural validity of the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit Proxy version (ASCOT-Proxy) completed by care home staff.

Rand S, Towers A, Allan S, Webster L, Palmer S, Carroll R Qual Life Res. 2024; 33(6):1555-1567.

PMID: 38507142 PMC: 11116179. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-024-03631-1.


References
1.
Flynn T, Chan P, Coast J, Peters T . Assessing quality of life among British older people using the ICEPOP CAPability (ICECAP-O) measure. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2011; 9(5):317-29. DOI: 10.2165/11594150-000000000-00000. View

2.
Davis J, Hsiung G, Bryan S, Jacova C, Jacova P, Munkacsy M . Agreement between Patient and Proxy Assessments of Quality of Life among Older Adults with Vascular Cognitive Impairment Using the EQ-5D-3L and ICECAP-O. PLoS One. 2016; 11(4):e0153878. PMC: 4839736. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153878. View

3.
van Leeuwen K, Bosmans J, Jansen A, Hoogendijk E, Van Tulder M, van der Horst H . Comparing measurement properties of the EQ-5D-3L, ICECAP-O, and ASCOT in frail older adults. Value Health. 2015; 18(1):35-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.09.006. View

4.
Hirani S, Beynon M, Cartwright M, Rixon L, Doll H, Henderson C . The effect of telecare on the quality of life and psychological well-being of elderly recipients of social care over a 12-month period: the Whole Systems Demonstrator cluster randomised trial. Age Ageing. 2013; 43(3):334-41. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/aft185. View

5.
Guyatt G, Walter S, Norman G . Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. J Chronic Dis. 1987; 40(2):171-8. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90069-5. View