» Articles » PMID: 30665401

Healthcare Professionals' Perspectives on Working Conditions, Leadership, and Safety Climate: a Cross-sectional Study

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Health Services
Date 2019 Jan 23
PMID 30665401
Citations 44
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Promoting patient and occupational safety are two key challenges for hospitals. When aiming to improve these two outcomes synergistically, psychosocial working conditions, leadership by hospital management and supervisors, and perceptions of patient and occupational safety climate have to be considered. Recent studies have shown that these key topics are interrelated and form a critical foundation for promoting patient and occupational safety in hospitals. So far, these topics have mainly been studied independently from each other. The present study investigated hospital staffs' perceptions of four different topics: (1) psychosocial working conditions, (2) leadership, (3) patient safety climate, and (4) occupational safety climate. We present results from a survey in two German university hospitals aiming to detect differences between nurses and physicians.

Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study using a standardized paper-based questionnaire. The survey was conducted with nurses and physicians to assess the four topics. The instruments mainly consisted of scales of the German version of the COPSOQ (Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire), one scale of the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI), scales to assess leadership and transformational leadership, scales to assess patient safety climate using the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSPSC), and analogous items to assess occupational safety climate.

Results: A total of 995 completed questionnaires out of 2512 distributed questionnaires were returned anonymously. The overall response rate was 39.6%. The sample consisted of 381 physicians and 567 nurses. We found various differences with regard to the four topics. In most of the COPSOQ and the HSPSC-scales, physicians rated psychosocial working conditions and patient safety climate more positively than nurses. With regard to occupational safety, nurses indicated higher occupational risks than physicians.

Conclusions: The WorkSafeMed study combined the assessment of the four topics psychosocial working conditions, leadership, patient safety climate, and occupational safety climate in hospitals. Looking at the four topics provides an overview of where improvements in hospitals may be needed for nurses and physicians. Based on these results, improvements in working conditions, patient safety climate, and occupational safety climate are required for health care professionals in German university hospitals - especially for nurses.

Citing Articles

Healthcare workers' knowledge, attitudes, and practices on catheter-associated UTI prevention: influencing factors in an OB/GYN hospital.

Qu F, Pang Y, Wang M, Liu X, Wang J, Li L Front Public Health. 2025; 13:1517015.

PMID: 40078757 PMC: 11897478. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1517015.


Psychosocial working conditions and violence prevention climate in German emergency departments - a cross-sectional study.

Reissmann S, Guliani M, Wirth T, Groneberg D, Harth V, Mache S BMC Emerg Med. 2025; 25(1):17.

PMID: 39849345 PMC: 11759433. DOI: 10.1186/s12873-024-01155-y.


Nurses' perceptions regarding their own professionalism attributes to quality neonatal, infant and under-5 childcare.

Lesao D, Rabie T, Lubbe W, Scholtz S BMC Nurs. 2024; 23(1):727.

PMID: 39379905 PMC: 11463118. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-024-02375-0.


Factors associated with intent to stay in the profession: an exploratory cluster analysis across healthcare professions in Switzerland.

Roth L, Gilles I, Antille E, Jubin J, Jolidon V, Oulevey-Bachmann A Eur J Public Health. 2024; 34(6):1146-1148.

PMID: 38905588 PMC: 11631472. DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckae100.


International cross-cultural development and field testing of the primary care practice questionnaire for the PaRIS survey (PaRIS-PCPQ).

Bloemeke-Cammin J, Groene O, Ballester M, Guanais F, Groenewegen P, Kendir C BMC Prim Care. 2024; 25(1):168.

PMID: 38760733 PMC: 11100105. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-024-02375-8.


References
1.
Firth-Cozens J, Mowbray D . Leadership and the quality of care. Qual Health Care. 2001; 10 Suppl 2:ii3-7. PMC: 1765760. DOI: 10.1136/qhc.0100003... View

2.
Schafer J, Graham J . Missing data: our view of the state of the art. Psychol Methods. 2002; 7(2):147-77. View

3.
Stein A, Makarawo T, Ahmad M . A survey of doctors' and nurses' knowledge, attitudes and compliance with infection control guidelines in Birmingham teaching hospitals. J Hosp Infect. 2003; 54(1):68-73. DOI: 10.1016/s0195-6701(03)00074-4. View

4.
Wirtz M . [On the problem of missing data: How to identify and reduce the impact of missing data on findings of data analysis]. Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2004; 43(2):109-15. DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-814839. View

5.
Seo D, Torabi M, Blair E, Ellis N . A cross-validation of safety climate scale using confirmatory factor analytic approach. J Safety Res. 2004; 35(4):427-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2004.04.006. View