The Impact of Decreased Scapulothoracic Upward Rotation on Subacromial Proximities

Overview

Journal J Orthop Sports Phys Ther

Specialty Orthopedics

Date 2019 Jan 19

PMID 30658048

Citations 14

Authors

Rebekah L Lawrence

Jonathan P Braman

Paula M Ludewig

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Decreased scapulothoracic upward rotation has been theorized to increase an individual's risk for rotator cuff compression by reducing the clearance for the tendons in the subacromial space (ie, subacromial proximities). However, the impact of decreased scapulothoracic upward rotation on subacromial proximities has not been tested during dynamic in vivo shoulder motion.

Objective: To determine the impact of decreased scapulothoracic upward rotation on subacromial proximities.

Methods: Shoulder kinematics were quantified in 40 participants, classified as having high or low scapulothoracic upward rotation, during scapular plane abduction using single-plane fluoroscopy and 2-D/3-D shape-matching. Subacromial proximities were calculated as (1) the normalized minimum distance between the coracoacromial arch and humeral rotator cuff insertion, and (2) the surface area of the humeral rotator cuff insertion in immediate proximity to the coracoacromial arch. The effect of decreased scapulothoracic upward rotation on subacromial proximities was assessed using 2-factor mixed-model analyses of variance. The prevalence of contact between the coracoacromial arch and rotator cuff was also quantified.

Results: Subacromial distances were generally smallest below 70° of humerothoracic elevation. With the arm at the side, the normalized minimum distance for participants in the low scapulothoracic upward rotation group was 34.8% smaller compared to those in the high upward rotation group (P = .049). Contact between the coracoacromial arch and rotator cuff tendon occurred in 45% of participants.

Conclusion: Decreased scapulothoracic upward rotation shifts the range of risk for subacromial rotator cuff compression to lower angles. However, the low prevalence of contact suggests that subacromial rotator cuff compression may be less common than traditionally presumed. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2019;49(3):180-191. Epub 18 Jan 2019. doi:10.2519/jospt.2019.8590.

Citing Articles

Changes in Shoulder Girdle Muscle Activity and Ratio During Pilates-Based Exercises.

Seo S, Jung E, Mun W, Roh S Life (Basel). 2025; 15(2).

PMID: 40003712 PMC: 11857265. DOI: 10.3390/life15020303.

In vivo shoulder kinematic changes and rotator cuff healing after surgical repair of large-to-massive rotator cuff tears.

Tashiro E, Kozono N, Higaki H, Shimoto T, Nakashima Y J Orthop Surg Res. 2024; 19(1):801.

PMID: 39604958 PMC: 11603637. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-05292-9.

The Effect of Low-Dose CT Protocols on Shoulder Model-Based Tracking accuracy Using Biplane Videoradiography.

Chen S, Lee E, Napier K, Rainbow M, Lawrence R Ann Biomed Eng. 2024; 53(2):481-491.

PMID: 39505762 PMC: 11805650. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-024-03645-3.

Geometric accuracy of low-dose CT scans for use in shoulder musculoskeletal research applications.

Lawrence R, Nicholson L, Lee E, Napier K, Zmistowski B, Rainbow M Med Eng Phys. 2024; 130:104214.

PMID: 39160033 PMC: 11479651. DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2024.104214.

Effects of Scapular Angular Deviations on Potential for Rotator Cuff Tendon Mechanical Compression.

Lawrence R, Richardson L, Bilodeau H, Bonath D, Dahn D, Em M Orthop J Sports Med. 2024; 12(3):23259671231219023.

PMID: 38435717 PMC: 10906059. DOI: 10.1177/23259671231219023.

References

Phadke V, Braman J, LaPrade R, Ludewig P . Comparison of glenohumeral motion using different rotation sequences. J Biomech. 2010; 44(4):700-5. PMC: 3042544. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.10.042. View

Soslowsky L, Thomopoulos S, Esmail A, Flanagan C, Iannotti J, Williamson 3rd J . Rotator cuff tendinosis in an animal model: role of extrinsic and overuse factors. Ann Biomed Eng. 2002; 30(8):1057-63. DOI: 10.1114/1.1509765. View

Braman J, Zhao K, Lawrence R, Harrison A, Ludewig P . Shoulder impingement revisited: evolution of diagnostic understanding in orthopedic surgery and physical therapy. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2013; 52(3):211-9. DOI: 10.1007/s11517-013-1074-1. View

Haahr J, Ostergaard S, Dalsgaard J, Norup K, Frost P, Lausen S . Exercises versus arthroscopic decompression in patients with subacromial impingement: a randomised, controlled study in 90 cases with a one year follow up. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005; 64(5):760-4. PMC: 1755495. DOI: 10.1136/ard.2004.021188. View

You B, Siy P, Anderst W, Tashman S . In vivo measurement of 3-D skeletal kinematics from sequences of biplane radiographs: application to knee kinematics. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2001; 20(6):514-25. DOI: 10.1109/42.929617. View

Edelson J, Luchs J . Aspects of coracoacromial ligament anatomy of interest to the arthroscopic surgeon. Arthroscopy. 1995; 11(6):715-9. DOI: 10.1016/0749-8063(95)90115-9. View

Struyf F, Nijs J, Mollekens S, Jeurissen I, Truijen S, Mottram S . Scapular-focused treatment in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Rheumatol. 2012; 32(1):73-85. DOI: 10.1007/s10067-012-2093-2. View

Feleus A, Bierma-Zeinstra S, Miedema H, Bernsen R, Verhaar J, Koes B . Incidence of non-traumatic complaints of arm, neck and shoulder in general practice. Man Ther. 2007; 13(5):426-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2007.05.010. View

Harris P, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde J . Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2008; 42(2):377-81. PMC: 2700030. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. View

10.

Hughes R, Bryant C, Hall J, Wening J, Huston L, Kuhn J . Glenoid inclination is associated with full-thickness rotator cuff tears. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003; (407):86-91. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200302000-00016. View

11.

Neer 2nd C . Impingement lesions. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983; (173):70-7. View

12.

Wu G, van der Helm F, Veeger H, Makhsous M, Van Roy P, Anglin C . ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion--Part II: shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand. J Biomech. 2005; 38(5):981-992. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.05.042. View

13.

Knorlein B, Baier D, Gatesy S, Laurence-Chasen J, Brainerd E . Validation of XMALab software for marker-based XROMM. J Exp Biol. 2016; 219(Pt 23):3701-3711. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.145383. View

14.

Sahrmann S, Azevedo D, Van Dillen L . Diagnosis and treatment of movement system impairment syndromes. Braz J Phys Ther. 2017; 21(6):391-399. PMC: 5693453. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2017.08.001. View

15.

Lawrence R, Sessions W, Jensen M, Staker J, Eid A, Breighner R . The effect of glenohumeral plane of elevation on supraspinatus subacromial proximity. J Biomech. 2018; 79:147-154. PMC: 6245671. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.08.005. View

16.

Ludewig P, Lawrence R, Braman J . What's in a name? Using movement system diagnoses versus pathoanatomic diagnoses. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013; 43(5):280-3. DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2013.0104. View

17.

Bey M, Brock S, Beierwaltes W, Zauel R, Kolowich P, Lock T . In vivo measurement of subacromial space width during shoulder elevation: technique and preliminary results in patients following unilateral rotator cuff repair. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2007; 22(7):767-73. PMC: 2033432. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.04.006. View

18.

McQuade K, Borstad J, Oliveira A . Critical and Theoretical Perspective on Scapular Stabilization: What Does It Really Mean, and Are We on the Right Track?. Phys Ther. 2016; 96(8):1162-9. DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20140230. View

19.

Endo K, Ikata T, Katoh S, Takeda Y . Radiographic assessment of scapular rotational tilt in chronic shoulder impingement syndrome. J Orthop Sci. 2001; 6(1):3-10. DOI: 10.1007/s007760170017. View

20.

Giphart J, van der Meijden O, Millett P . The effects of arm elevation on the 3-dimensional acromiohumeral distance: a biplane fluoroscopy study with normative data. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012; 21(11):1593-600. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.11.023. View