» Articles » PMID: 30655583

Tibio-Femoral Contact Force Distribution is Not the Only Factor Governing Pivot Location After Total Knee Arthroplasty

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2019 Jan 19
PMID 30655583
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Total knee arthroplasty aims to mimic the natural knee kinematics by optimizing implant geometry, but it is not clear how loading relates to tibio-femoral anterior-posterior translation or internal-external pivoting. We hypothesised that the point of pivot in the transverse plane is governed by the location of the highest axial force. Tibio-femoral loading was measured using an instrumented tibial component in six total knee arthroplasty patients (aged 65-80y, 5-7y post-op) during 5-6 squat repetitions, while knee kinematics were captured using a mobile video-fluoroscope. In the range of congruent tibio-femoral contact the medial femoral condyle remained approximately static while the lateral condyle translated posteriorly by 4.1 mm (median). Beyond the congruent range, the medial and lateral condyle motions both abruptly changed to anterior sliding by 4.6 mm, and 2.6 mm respectively. On average, both the axial loading and pivot position were more medial near extension, and transferred to the lateral side in flexion. However, no consistent relationship between pivoting and load distribution was found across all patients throughout flexion, with R values ranging from 0.00 to 0.65. Tibio-femoral kinematics is not related to the load distribution alone: medial loading of the knee does not necessarily imply a medial pivot location.

Citing Articles

Impact of the external knee flexion moment on patello-femoral loading derived from loads and kinematics.

Trepczynski A, Kneifel P, Heyland M, Leskovar M, Moewis P, Damm P Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025; 12:1473951.

PMID: 39881960 PMC: 11774905. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1473951.


Experimental and computational evaluation of knee implant wear and creep under in vivo and ISO boundary conditions.

Dreyer M, Nasab S, Favre P, Amstad F, Crockett R, Taylor W Biomed Eng Online. 2024; 23(1):130.

PMID: 39716270 PMC: 11664841. DOI: 10.1186/s12938-024-01321-0.


Asymmetric gap balancing improves knee kinematic following primary total knee arthroplasty.

Valpiana P, Salvi A, Ghirardelli S, Bernardi M, Petralia G, Aloisi G Arthroplasty. 2024; 6(1):29.

PMID: 38659002 PMC: 11044442. DOI: 10.1186/s42836-024-00243-5.


Can a Musculoskeletal Model Adapted to Knee Implant Geometry Improve Prediction of 3D Contact Forces and Moments?.

Guitteny S, Aissaoui R, Dumas R Ann Biomed Eng. 2023; 51(8):1872-1883.

PMID: 37101092 DOI: 10.1007/s10439-023-03216-y.


Dynamic Knee Joint Line Orientation Is Not Predictive of Tibio-Femoral Load Distribution During Walking.

Trepczynski A, Moewis P, Damm P, Schutz P, Dymke J, Hommel H Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021; 9:754715.

PMID: 34820363 PMC: 8607168. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.754715.


References
1.
Iwaki H, Pinskerova V, Freeman M . Tibiofemoral movement 1: the shapes and relative movements of the femur and tibia in the unloaded cadaver knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000; 82(8):1189-95. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.82b8.10717. View

2.
Hill P, Vedi V, Williams A, Iwaki H, Pinskerova V, Freeman M . Tibiofemoral movement 2: the loaded and unloaded living knee studied by MRI. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000; 82(8):1196-8. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.82b8.10716. View

3.
Thomas R, Resnick D, Alazraki N, Daniel D, Greenfield R . Compartmental evaluation of osteoarthritis of the knee. A comparative study of available diagnostic modalities. Radiology. 1975; 116(3):585-94. DOI: 10.1148/116.3.585. View

4.
Bellemans J, Banks S, Victor J, Vandenneucker H, Moemans A . Fluoroscopic analysis of the kinematics of deep flexion in total knee arthroplasty. Influence of posterior condylar offset. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002; 84(1):50-3. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.84b1.12432. View

5.
Cicuttini F, Wluka A, Wang Y, Davis S, Hankin J, Ebeling P . Compartment differences in knee cartilage volume in healthy adults. J Rheumatol. 2002; 29(3):554-6. View