» Articles » PMID: 33895657

In Vivo Articular Contact Pattern of a Total Wrist Arthroplasty Design

Overview
Journal J Biomech
Specialty Physiology
Date 2021 Apr 25
PMID 33895657
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Total wrist arthroplasty (TWA) designs suffer from relatively high complication rates when compared to other arthroplasties. Understanding the contact pattern of hip and knee replacement has improved their design and function; however, the in vivo contact pattern of TWA has not yet been examined and is thus the aim of this study. We hypothesized that the center of contact (CoC) is located at the geometric centers of the carpal component and radial component in the neutral posture and that the CoC moves along the principal arcs of curvature throughout primary anatomical motions. Wrist motion and implant kinematics of six patients with the Freedom® total wrist implant were studied during various tasks using biplanar videoradiography. The location of the CoC of the components was investigated by calculating distance fields between the articular surfaces. We found the CoC at the neutral posture was not at the geometric centers but was located 3.5 mm radially on the carpal component and 1.2 mm ulnarly on the radial component. From extension to flexion, the CoC moved 10.8 mm from dorsal to volar side on the carpal component (p < 0.0001) and 7.2 mm from volar to dorsal on the radial component (p = 0.0009). From radial to ulnar deviation, the CoC moved 12.4 mm from radial to ulnar on the carpal component (p < 0.0001), and 5.6 mm from ulnar to radial on the radial component (p = 0.009). The findings of this study may eventually improve TWA success by advancing future designs through a more accurate understating of their kinematic performance in vivo.

Citing Articles

Finite Element Modeling of the Human Wrist: A Review.

Mena A, Wollstein R, Baus J, Yang J J Wrist Surg. 2024; 12(6):478-487.

PMID: 38213568 PMC: 10781520. DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1768930.


Correlation between carpal rotational alignment and postoperative wrist range of motion following total wrist arthroplasty.

Ota M, Matsui Y, Kawamura D, Urita A, Endo T, Iwasaki N BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022; 23(1):821.

PMID: 36042450 PMC: 9426257. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05776-x.


Musculoskeletal Modeling of the Wrist via a Multi Body Simulation.

Eschweiler J, Praster M, Quack V, Michalik R, Hildebrand F, Rath B Life (Basel). 2022; 12(4).

PMID: 35455073 PMC: 9031395. DOI: 10.3390/life12040581.

References
1.
Gilbert S, Rana A, Lipman J, Wright T, Westrich G . Design changes improve contact patterns and articular surface damage in total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2014; 21(6):1129-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2014.07.022. View

2.
Gislason M, Foster E, Main D, Fusiek G, Niewczas P, Bransby-Zachary M . Mechanical testing and modelling of the Universal 2 implant. Med Eng Phys. 2016; 38(6):511-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2016.02.008. View

3.
Marai G, Laidlaw D, Demiralp C, Andrews S, Grimm C, Crisco J . Estimating joint contact areas and ligament lengths from bone kinematics and surfaces. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2004; 51(5):790-9. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2004.826606. View

4.
Grosland N, Rogge R, Adams B . Influence of articular geometry on prosthetic wrist stability. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004; (421):134-42. DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000126304.79828.2c. View

5.
Short W, Werner F, Fortino M, Mann K . Analysis of the kinematics of the scaphoid and lunate in the intact wrist joint. Hand Clin. 1997; 13(1):93-108. View