» Articles » PMID: 30640382

Complication Rates and Downstream Medical Costs Associated With Invasive Diagnostic Procedures for Lung Abnormalities in the Community Setting

Overview
Journal JAMA Intern Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2019 Jan 15
PMID 30640382
Citations 48
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Importance: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services added lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) as a Medicare preventive service benefit in 2015 following findings from the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) that showed a 16% reduction in lung cancer mortality associated with LDCT. A challenge in developing and promoting a national lung cancer screening program is the high false-positive rate of LDCT because abnormal findings from thoracic imaging often trigger subsequent invasive diagnostic procedures and could lead to postprocedural complications.

Objective: To determine the complication rates and downstream medical costs associated with invasive diagnostic procedures performed for identification of lung abnormalities in the community setting.

Design, Setting, And Participants: A retrospective cohort study of non-protocol-driven community practices captured in MarketScan Commercial Claims & Encounters and Medicare supplemental databases was conducted. A nationally representative sample of 344 510 patients aged 55 to 77 years who underwent invasive diagnostic procedures between 2008 and 2013 was included.

Main Outcomes And Measures: One-year complication rates were calculated for 4 groups of invasive diagnostic procedures. The complication rates and costs were further stratified by age group.

Results: Of the 344 510 individuals aged 55 to 77 years included in the study, 174 702 comprised the study group (109 363 [62.6%] women) and 169 808 served as the control group (106 007 [62.4%] women). The estimated complication rate was 22.2% (95% CI, 21.7%-22.7%) for individuals in the young age group and 23.8% (95% CI, 23.0%-24.6%) for those in the Medicare group; the rates were approximately twice as high as those reported in the NLST (9.8% and 8.5%, respectively). The mean incremental complication costs were $6320 (95% CI, $5863-$6777) for minor complications to $56 845 (95% CI, $47 953-$65 737) for major complications.

Conclusions And Relevance: The rates of complications after invasive diagnostic procedures were higher than the rates reported in clinical trials. Physicians and patients should be aware of the potential risks of subsequent adverse events and their high downstream costs in the shared decision-making process.

Citing Articles

Clinical value of serum PRDM16 in early diagnosis and prognosis assessment of lung adenocarcinoma.

Fan M, Li M, Zhou J, Li A, Sun Y, Shi P Mol Biol Rep. 2025; 52(1):225.

PMID: 39937385 DOI: 10.1007/s11033-025-10315-7.


Lung cancer screening in people who have never smoked: lessons from East Asia.

Welch H, Gao W, Wilder F, Kim S, Silvestri G BMJ. 2025; 388:e081674.

PMID: 39914848 PMC: 11800067. DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2024-081674.


Toward a Computable Phenotype for Determining Eligibility of Lung Cancer Screening Using Electronic Health Records.

Yang S, Huang Y, Lou X, Lyu T, Wei R, Mehta H JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2025; 9():e2400139.

PMID: 39818952 PMC: 11748906. DOI: 10.1200/CCI.24.00139.


Economic Evaluation of a Novel Lung Cancer Diagnostic in a Population of Patients with a Positive Low-Dose Computed Tomography Result.

Morris M, Habib S, Do Valle M, Schneider J J Health Econ Outcomes Res. 2025; 11(2):74-79.

PMID: 39810799 PMC: 11731590. DOI: 10.36469/001c.121512.


Precision patient selection for improved detection of circulating genetically abnormal cells in pulmonary nodules.

Tu M, Wang X, Liu H, Jia H, Wang Y, Li J Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):22532.

PMID: 39341939 PMC: 11438957. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-73542-1.


References
1.
Bach P, Mirkin J, Oliver T, Azzoli C, Berry D, Brawley O . Benefits and harms of CT screening for lung cancer: a systematic review. JAMA. 2012; 307(22):2418-29. PMC: 3709596. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2012.5521. View

2.
Seamans M, Carey T, Westreich D, Cole S, Wheeler S, Alexander G . Association of Household Opioid Availability and Prescription Opioid Initiation Among Household Members. JAMA Intern Med. 2017; 178(1):102-109. PMC: 5833498. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.7280. View

3.
Austin P . Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples. Stat Med. 2009; 28(25):3083-107. PMC: 3472075. DOI: 10.1002/sim.3697. View

4.
Woolf S, Harris R, Campos-Outcalt D . Low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer: how strong is the evidence?. JAMA Intern Med. 2014; 174(12):2019-22. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.5626. View

5.
Khan M, Straub R, Moghaddam S, Maataoui A, Gurung J, Wagner T . Variables affecting the risk of pneumothorax and intrapulmonal hemorrhage in CT-guided transthoracic biopsy. Eur Radiol. 2008; 18(7):1356-63. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-008-0893-1. View