» Articles » PMID: 30629633

Mutant Prevention and Minimum Inhibitory Concentration Drug Values for Enrofloxacin, Ceftiofur, Florfenicol, Tilmicosin and Tulathromycin Tested Against Swine Pathogens Actinobacillus Pleuropneumoniae, Pasteurella Multocida and Streptococcus Suis

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2019 Jan 11
PMID 30629633
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae, Pasteurella multocida and Streptococcus suis are prevalent bacterial causes of swine infections. Morbidity, mortality and positively impacting the financial burden of infection occurs with appropriate antimicrobial therapy. Increasing antimicrobial resistance complicates drug therapy and resistance prevention is now a necessity to optimize therapy and prolong drug life. Mutant bacterial cells are said to arise spontaneously in bacterial densities of 107-109 or greater colony forming units/ml. Antibiotic drug concentration inhibiting growth of the least susceptible cell in these high density populations has been termed the mutant prevention concentration (MPC). In this study MPC and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of ceftiofur, enrofloxacin, florfenicol, tilmicosin and tulathromycin were determined against the swine pathogens A. pleuropneumoniae, P.multocida and S. suis. The following MIC90/MPC90 values (mg/L) for 67 A. pleuropneumoniae and 73 P. multocida strains respectively were as follows: A. pleuropneumoniae 0.031/0.5, ≤0.016/0.5, 0.5/2, 4/32, 2/32; P. multocida 0.004/0.25, 0.016/0.125, 0.5/0.5, 8/16, 0.5/1. For 33 S. suis strains, MIC90 values (mg/L) respectively were as follows: 1, 0.25, 4, ≥8 and ≥8. A total of 16 S. suis strains with MIC values of 0.063-0.5 mg/L to ceftiofur and 0.25-0.5 mg/L to enrofloxacin were tested by MPC; MPC values respectively were 0.5 and 1 mg/L respectively. MPC concentrations provide a dosing target which may serve to reduce amplification of bacterial subpopulations with reduced antimicrobial susceptibility. Drug potency based on MIC90 values was ceftiofur > enrofloxacin >florfenicol = tulathromycin > tilmicosin; based on MPC90 values was enrofloxacin > ceftiofur > tulathromycin > florfenicol ≥ tilmicosin.

Citing Articles

Simulation of a field condition to evaluate the risk of enrofloxacin-resistant strain selection in food producing rabbits treated via drinking water.

Circella E, Lucatello L, Montanucci L, Belloli C, Capolongo F Front Vet Sci. 2025; 12:1474409.

PMID: 40018700 PMC: 11865925. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1474409.


Serotyping and antimicrobial resistance of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae isolates from fattening pigs in Poland from 2019 to 2024.

Paulina P, Dawid T BMC Vet Res. 2025; 21(1):40.

PMID: 39881342 PMC: 11776277. DOI: 10.1186/s12917-025-04504-6.


Comparison of the Minimum Inhibitory and Mutant Prevention Drug Concentrations for Pradofloxacin and 7 Other Antimicrobial Agents Tested Against Swine Isolates of and .

Blondeau J, Fitch S Molecules. 2024; 29(22).

PMID: 39598838 PMC: 11597606. DOI: 10.3390/molecules29225448.


Evaluation the kill rate and mutant selection window of danofloxacin against Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae in a peristaltic pump model.

Wang H, Liao C, Ding K, Zhang L, Wang L BMC Vet Res. 2024; 20(1):241.

PMID: 38831324 PMC: 11145865. DOI: 10.1186/s12917-024-04016-9.


Comparative Minimum Inhibitory and Mutant Prevention Drug Concentrations for Pradofloxacin and Seven Other Antimicrobial Agents Tested against Bovine Isolates of and .

Blondeau J, Fitch S Pathogens. 2024; 13(5).

PMID: 38787251 PMC: 11123865. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens13050399.


References
1.
Blondeau J, Zhao X, Hansen G, Drlica K . Mutant prevention concentrations of fluoroquinolones for clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001; 45(2):433-8. PMC: 90309. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.45.2.433-438.2001. View

2.
Shin S, Kang S, Nabin R, Kang M, Yoo H . Evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of florfenicol against bacteria isolated from bovine and porcine respiratory disease. Vet Microbiol. 2005; 106(1-2):73-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2004.11.015. View

3.
Drlica K, Zhao X . Mutant selection window hypothesis updated. Clin Infect Dis. 2007; 44(5):681-8. DOI: 10.1086/511642. View

4.
Blondeau J, Hansen G, Metzler K, Hedlin P . The role of PK/PD parameters to avoid selection and increase of resistance: mutant prevention concentration. J Chemother. 2004; 16 Suppl 3:1-19. DOI: 10.1080/1120009x.2004.11782371. View

5.
Dong Y, Zhao X, Domagala J, Drlica K . Effect of fluoroquinolone concentration on selection of resistant mutants of Mycobacterium bovis BCG and Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999; 43(7):1756-8. PMC: 89357. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.43.7.1756. View