» Articles » PMID: 30623069

Self-collected Pap Smears May Provide an Acceptable and Effective Method of Cervical Cancer Screening

Overview
Journal Health Sci Rep
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2019 Jan 10
PMID 30623069
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Aims: The role of the Papanicolou (Pap) smear in the early detection and prevention of cervical cancer is well established. However, many women fail to undertake the test because of embarrassment or other reasons. To address this problem, we evaluated the feasibility of implementing self-sampling of cervical cytology as an alternative to clinician-collected Pap smears and compared it with the gold standard of colposcopy in terms of specificity.

Materials And Methods: A prospective preliminary study of 40 women recruited from the colposcopy clinic of a tertiary referral hospital was undertaken. Participants were instructed in the technique of self-sampling and asked to collect their own Pap smears. Colposcopic examinations were performed and biopsies taken, if indicated. Clinician-collected Pap smears were performed 4 weeks later. Pairwise agreement was calculated between the outcomes of self-collected, colposcopic, and clinician-collected samples using the weighted κ statistic.

Results: Self-collected Pap smear had a high level of acceptability among the women, all of whom were able to collect adequate tissue. The agreement of self-collected Pap smears with colposcopic assessment was no worse than that of clinician-collected Pap smears (Cohen's κ statistic 0.54 [95% CI, 0.27-0.82]; cf 0.49 [0.2-0.78], respectively). The specificity of self-collected Pap smears was almost identical to that of clinician-collected samples (specificity: 86% vs 81%, respectively). Direct comparison between patient and clinician collected Pap smears showed fair agreement (κ statistic 0.38 [0.07-0.68]). There were no adverse events in either group.

Conclusions: Self-collection of Pap smears is an effective and acceptable alternative to clinician-collected samples and may provide a strategy for improving compliance with cervical testing programs.

Citing Articles

Poor Performance of Applicator Tampon-Based Self-Collection for Liquid-Based Cytology Among Women Attending a Tertiary Hospital in South Africa.

Tiiti T, Nkwinika V, Mashishi T, Molefi K, Msibi T, Khaba M Diagn Cytopathol. 2024; 53(4):150-160.

PMID: 39663943 PMC: 11874162. DOI: 10.1002/dc.25429.


A comparative study of self-collected versus clinician-collected specimens in detecting high-risk HPV infection: a prospective cross-sectional study.

Parapob N, Lekawanvijit S, Tongsong T, Charoenkwan K, Tantipalakorn C Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2024; 67(6):557-564.

PMID: 39376071 PMC: 11581809. DOI: 10.5468/ogs.24117.


Investigating under-reported human papillomavirus genotypes in Grenadian women through self-sampling for cervical cancer screening.

McGill F, Fields P, Bahadoor-Yetman A, Manglardi E, Bailey R, Padala K Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2024; 48:e62.

PMID: 39044773 PMC: 11265311. DOI: 10.26633/RPSP.2024.62.


The Efficiency of Cervical Pap and Comparison of Conventional Pap Smear and Liquid-Based Cytology: A Review.

Dasgupta S Cureus. 2023; 15(11):e48343.

PMID: 38060751 PMC: 10698710. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.48343.


Validity and acceptance of self vs conventional sampling for the analysis of human papillomavirus and Pap smear.

Gibert M, Sanchez-Contador C, Artigues G Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):2809.

PMID: 36797261 PMC: 9933799. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-29255-y.


References
1.
McCredie M, Sharples K, Paul C, Baranyai J, Medley G, Jones R . Natural history of cervical neoplasia and risk of invasive cancer in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2008; 9(5):425-34. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70103-7. View

2.
Selvaggi S, Guidos B . Endocervical component: is it a determinant of specimen adequacy?. Diagn Cytopathol. 2002; 26(1):53-5. DOI: 10.1002/dc.10019. View

3.
Sultana F, English D, Simpson J, Drennan K, Mullins R, Brotherton J . Home-based HPV self-sampling improves participation by never-screened and under-screened women: Results from a large randomized trial (iPap) in Australia. Int J Cancer. 2016; 139(2):281-90. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.30031. View

4.
Gupta S, Palmer C, Bik E, Cardenas J, Nunez H, Kraal L . Self-Sampling for Human Papillomavirus Testing: Increased Cervical Cancer Screening Participation and Incorporation in International Screening Programs. Front Public Health. 2018; 6:77. PMC: 5900042. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00077. View

5.
Gyllensten U, Sanner K, Gustavsson I, Lindell M, Wikstrom I, Wilander E . Short-time repeat high-risk HPV testing by self-sampling for screening of cervical cancer. Br J Cancer. 2011; 105(5):694-7. PMC: 3188941. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2011.277. View