Drawings of Real-world Scenes During Free Recall Reveal Detailed Object and Spatial Information in Memory

Overview

Journal Nat Commun

Specialty Biology

Date 2019 Jan 4

PMID 30602785

Citations 35

Authors

Wilma A Bainbridge

Elizabeth H Hall

Chris I Baker

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Understanding the content of memory is essential to teasing apart its underlying mechanisms. While recognition tests have commonly been used to probe memory, it is difficult to establish what specific content is driving performance. Here, we instead focus on free recall of real-world scenes, and quantify the content of memory using a drawing task. Participants studied 30 scenes and, after a distractor task, drew as many images in as much detail as possible from memory. The resulting memory-based drawings were scored by thousands of online observers, revealing numerous objects, few memory intrusions, and precise spatial information. Further, we find that visual saliency and meaning maps can explain aspects of memory performance and observe no relationship between recall and recognition for individual images. Our findings show that not only is it possible to quantify the content of memory during free recall, but those memories contain detailed representations of our visual experiences.

Citing Articles

The Visual Integration of Semantic and Spatial Information of Objects in Naturalistic Scenes (VISIONS) database: attentional, conceptual, and perceptual norms.

Allegretti E, DInnocenzo G, Coco M Behav Res Methods. 2025; 57(1):42.

PMID: 39753746 DOI: 10.3758/s13428-024-02535-9.

Curiosity shapes spatial exploration and cognitive map formation in humans.

Cen D, Teichert E, Hodgetts C, Gruber M Commun Psychol. 2024; 2(1):129.

PMID: 39738810 PMC: 11685098. DOI: 10.1038/s44271-024-00174-6.

Drawings reveal changes in object memory, but not spatial memory, across time.

Megla E, Rosenthal S, Bainbridge W Cognition. 2024; 254:105988.

PMID: 39476659 PMC: 11611671. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105988.

More than words: can free reports adequately measure the richness of perception?.

Hirschhorn R, Mudrik L Neurosci Conscious. 2024; 2024(1):niae035.

PMID: 39445136 PMC: 11498181. DOI: 10.1093/nc/niae035.

Drawing as a versatile cognitive tool.

Fan J, Bainbridge W, Chamberlain R, Wammes J Nat Rev Psychol. 2024; 2(9):556-568.

PMID: 39239312 PMC: 11377027. DOI: 10.1038/s44159-023-00212-w.

References

Shiffrin R . Visual free recall. Science. 1973; 180(4089):980-2. DOI: 10.1126/science.180.4089.980. View

Corkin S . What's new with the amnesic patient H.M.?. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002; 3(2):153-60. DOI: 10.1038/nrn726. View

Hollingworth A . Constructing visual representations of natural scenes: the roles of short- and long-term visual memory. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2004; 30(3):519-37. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.30.3.519. View

Ducharme R, Fraisse P . [Genetic study of the memorization of words and pictures]. Can J Psychol. 1965; 19(3):253-61. View

Torralbo A, Walther D, Chai B, Caddigan E, Fei-Fei L, Beck D . Good exemplars of natural scene categories elicit clearer patterns than bad exemplars but not greater BOLD activity. PLoS One. 2013; 8(3):e58594. PMC: 3608650. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058594. View

Henderson J, Hayes T . Meaning-based guidance of attention in scenes as revealed by meaning maps. Nat Hum Behav. 2019; 1(10):743-747. PMC: 7455012. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-017-0208-0. View

Gallistel C . The importance of proving the null. Psychol Rev. 2009; 116(2):439-53. PMC: 2859953. DOI: 10.1037/a0015251. View

Landman R, Spekreijse H, Lamme V . Large capacity storage of integrated objects before change blindness. Vision Res. 2003; 43(2):149-64. DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(02)00402-9. View

Agrell B, Dehlin O . The clock-drawing test. 1998. Age Ageing. 2012; 41 Suppl 3:iii41-5. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afs149. View

10.

Perdreau F, Cavanagh P . Drawing experts have better visual memory while drawing. J Vis. 2015; 15(5):5. DOI: 10.1167/15.5.5. View

11.

Marks D . Visual imagery differences in the recall of pictures. Br J Psychol. 1973; 64(1):17-24. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1973.tb01322.x. View

12.

Bainbridge W, Isola P, Oliva A . The intrinsic memorability of face photographs. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013; 142(4):1323-34. DOI: 10.1037/a0033872. View

13.

Brady T, Konkle T, Alvarez G, Oliva A . Visual long-term memory has a massive storage capacity for object details. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008; 105(38):14325-9. PMC: 2533687. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0803390105. View

14.

Tabachnick B, Brotsky S . Free recall and complexity of pictorial stimuli. Mem Cognit. 2011; 4(5):466-70. DOI: 10.3758/BF03213205. View

15.

Greene M . Statistics of high-level scene context. Front Psychol. 2013; 4:777. PMC: 3810604. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00777. View

16.

Cunningham C, Yassa M, Egeth H . Massive memory revisited: Limitations on storage capacity for object details in visual long-term memory. Learn Mem. 2015; 22(11):563-6. PMC: 4749727. DOI: 10.1101/lm.039404.115. View

17.

Chamberlain R, Wagemans J . The genesis of errors in drawing. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016; 65:195-207. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.04.002. View

18.

Holdstock J, Mayes A, Roberts N, Cezayirli E, Isaac C, OReilly R . Under what conditions is recognition spared relative to recall after selective hippocampal damage in humans?. Hippocampus. 2002; 12(3):341-51. DOI: 10.1002/hipo.10011. View

19.

Staresina B, Davachi L . Differential encoding mechanisms for subsequent associative recognition and free recall. J Neurosci. 2006; 26(36):9162-72. PMC: 6674493. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2877-06.2006. View

20.

Cohen D, Bennett S . Why can't most people draw what they see?. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1997; 23(3):609-21. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.23.3.609. View