Serum Procalcitonin and Lactoferrin in Detection of Acute Appendicitis; a Diagnostic Accuracy Study

Overview

Journal Emerg (Tehran)

Specialty Emergency Medicine

Date 2018 Dec 26

PMID 30584567

Citations 1

Authors

Mohammad-Reza Motie

Anvar Soleimani

Arash Soltani

Seyed Isaac Hashemy

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: Finding an accurate diagnostic test can reduce the rate of unnecessary abdominal surgery in cases of suspected acute appendicitis (AA). This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of serum lactoferrin (LF) and procalcitonin (PCT) in detection of patients with acute appendicitis.

Methods: In this diagnostic accuracy study, screening performance characteristics of PCT and LF were calculated in patients suspected with acute appendicitis and healthy volunteers as control group.

Results: 131 cases participated (61 as case and 70 as control). The mean serum level of LF (0.9±0.14 vs 0.2±0.13 µg/ml; p 0.0001) and PCT (0.15±0.21 vs 0.11±0.02 ng/dl; p = 0.02) were significantly higher in patients suspected with AA. The AUC of PCT and LF were 0.46 (95% CI: 0.31-0.61) and 0.61 (95%CI: 0.47 - 0.76), respectively. At a 0.90 µg/ml cut-off value, LF had 77% (95 % CI: 63 - 91) sensitivity and 43% (95 % CI: 31 - 55) specificity. Also, at a 0.11 ng/dl cut-off value, PCT had 41% (95 % CI: 26 - 56) sensitivity and 69% (95 % CI: 53 - 85) specificity.

Conclusion: Based on the main finding of present study, the overall accuracy of serum PCT and LF in detection of patients with acute appendicitis are in poor to failed range and it seems that they could not be considered as good screening tools for this purpose.

Citing Articles

The Use of Procalcitonin in the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis: A Systematic Review.

Dale L Cureus. 2022; 14(10):e30292.

PMID: 36407148 PMC: 9655768. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.30292.

References

Flum D, Morris A, Koepsell T, Dellinger E . Has misdiagnosis of appendicitis decreased over time? A population-based analysis. JAMA. 2001; 286(14):1748-53. DOI: 10.1001/jama.286.14.1748. View

Andersson R . Meta-analysis of the clinical and laboratory diagnosis of appendicitis. Br J Surg. 2004; 91(1):28-37. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.4464. View

Smink D, Finkelstein J, Garcia Pena B, Shannon M, Taylor G, Fishman S . Diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children using a clinical practice guideline. J Pediatr Surg. 2004; 39(3):458-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2003.11.015. View

Kafetzis D, Velissariou I, Nikolaides P, Sklavos M, Maktabi M, Spyridis G . Procalcitonin as a predictor of severe appendicitis in children. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2005; 24(7):484-7. DOI: 10.1007/s10096-005-1360-4. View

Pepe M, Longton G . Standardizing diagnostic markers to evaluate and compare their performance. Epidemiology. 2005; 16(5):598-603. DOI: 10.1097/01.ede.0000173041.03470.8b. View

Fluss R, Faraggi D, Reiser B . Estimation of the Youden Index and its associated cutoff point. Biom J. 2005; 47(4):458-72. DOI: 10.1002/bimj.200410135. View

Abdeldaim Y, Mahmood S, Mc Avinchey D . The Alvarado score as a tool for diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Ir Med J. 2007; 100(1):342. View

Bundy D, Byerley J, Liles E, Perrin E, Katznelson J, Rice H . Does this child have appendicitis?. JAMA. 2007; 298(4):438-51. PMC: 2703737. DOI: 10.1001/jama.298.4.438. View

Langhorst J, Elsenbruch S, Koelzer J, Rueffer A, Michalsen A, Dobos G . Noninvasive markers in the assessment of intestinal inflammation in inflammatory bowel diseases: performance of fecal lactoferrin, calprotectin, and PMN-elastase, CRP, and clinical indices. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007; 103(1):162-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01556.x. View

10.

Thuijls G, Derikx J, Prakken F, Huisman B, van Bijnen Ing A, van Heurn E . A pilot study on potential new plasma markers for diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Am J Emerg Med. 2010; 29(3):256-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2009.09.029. View

11.

Petroianu A . Diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Int J Surg. 2012; 10(3):115-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2012.02.006. View

12.

Addiss D, Shaffer N, Fowler B, Tauxe R . The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol. 1990; 132(5):910-25. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115734. View

13.

Chandel V, Batt S, Bhat M, Kawoosa N, Yousuf A, Zargar B . Procalcitonin as the biomarker of inflammation in diagnosis of appendicitis in pediatric patients and prevention of unnecessary appendectomies. Indian J Surg. 2012; 73(2):136-41. PMC: 3077170. DOI: 10.1007/s12262-010-0214-1. View

14.

Wu J, Chen H, Lee S, Chan R, Lee C, Chang S . Diagnostic role of procalcitonin in patients with suspected appendicitis. World J Surg. 2012; 36(8):1744-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-012-1579-z. View

15.

Yu C, Juan L, Wu M, Shen C, Wu J, Lee C . Systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of procalcitonin, C-reactive protein and white blood cell count for suspected acute appendicitis. Br J Surg. 2012; 100(3):322-9. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9008. View

16.

Khan A, Sawan A, Likourezos A, Schnellinger M, Garcia E . The usefulness of procalcitonin in the diagnosis of appendicitis in children: a pilot study. Emerg Med Int. 2013; 2012:317504. PMC: 3529464. DOI: 10.1155/2012/317504. View

17.

Schellekens D, Hulsewe K, van Acker B, van Bijnen A, de Jaegere T, Sastrowijoto S . Evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of plasma markers for early diagnosis in patients suspected for acute appendicitis. Acad Emerg Med. 2013; 20(7):703-10. DOI: 10.1111/acem.12160. View

18.

Mostbeck G, Adam E, Nielsen M, Claudon M, Clevert D, Nicolau C . How to diagnose acute appendicitis: ultrasound first. Insights Imaging. 2016; 7(2):255-63. PMC: 4805616. DOI: 10.1007/s13244-016-0469-6. View

19.

Yamashita H, Yuasa N, Takeuchi E, Goto Y, Miyake H, Miyata K . Diagnostic value of procalcitonin for acute complicated appendicitis. Nagoya J Med Sci. 2016; 78(1):79-88. PMC: 4767516. View

20.

Buyukbese Sarsu S, Erbagci A, Ulusal H, Karakus S, Bulbul O . The Place of Calprotectin, Lactoferrin, and High-Mobility Group Box 1 Protein on Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis with Children. Indian J Surg. 2017; 79(2):131-136. PMC: 5386938. DOI: 10.1007/s12262-015-1441-2. View