Lattice Models and Monte Carlo Methods for Simulating DNA Origami Self-assembly
Overview
Chemistry
Affiliations
The optimal design of DNA origami systems that assemble rapidly and robustly is hampered by the lack of a model for self-assembly that is sufficiently detailed yet computationally tractable. Here, we propose a model for DNA origami that strikes a balance between these two criteria by representing these systems on a lattice at the level of binding domains. The free energy of hybridization between individual binding domains is estimated with a nearest-neighbour model. Double helical segments are treated as being rigid, but we allow flexibility at points where the backbone of one of the strands is interrupted, which provides a reasonably realistic representation of partially and fully assembled states. Particular attention is paid to the constraints imposed by the double helical twist, as they determine where strand crossovers between adjacent helices can occur. To improve the efficiency of sampling configuration space, we develop Monte Carlo methods for sampling scaffold conformations in near-assembled states, and we carry out simulations in the grand canonical ensemble, enabling us to avoid considering states with unbound staples. We demonstrate that our model can quickly sample assembled configurations of a small origami design previously studied with the oxDNA model, as well as a design with staples that span longer segments of the scaffold. The sampling ability of our method should allow for good statistics to be obtained when studying the assembly pathways and is suited to investigating, in particular, the effects of design and assembly conditions on these pathways and their resulting final assembled structures.
Dissipative Self-Assembly of Patchy Particles under Nonequilibrium Drive: A Computational Study.
Nag S, Bisker G J Chem Theory Comput. 2024; 20(20):8844-8861.
PMID: 39365844 PMC: 11500309. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.4c00856.
Driven Self-Assembly of Patchy Particles Overcoming Equilibrium Limitations.
Nag S, Bisker G J Chem Theory Comput. 2024; .
PMID: 39255461 PMC: 11428128. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.4c01118.
Simulations of DNA-Origami Self-Assembly Reveal Design-Dependent Nucleation Barriers.
Cumberworth A, Frenkel D, Reinhardt A Nano Lett. 2022; 22(17):6916-6922.
PMID: 36037484 PMC: 9479157. DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c01372.
Design Approaches and Computational Tools for DNA Nanostructures.
Koh H, Lee J, Lee J, Kim R, Tabata O, Jin-Woo K IEEE Open J Nanotechnol. 2022; 2:86-100.
PMID: 35756857 PMC: 9232119. DOI: 10.1109/ojnano.2021.3119913.
Chatzipapas K, Papadimitroulas P, Emfietzoglou D, Kalospyros S, Hada M, Georgakilas A Cancers (Basel). 2020; 12(4).
PMID: 32225023 PMC: 7226293. DOI: 10.3390/cancers12040799.