» Articles » PMID: 30569507

LCR1 and LCR2, Two Multi-analyte Blood Tests to Assess Liver Cancer Risk in Patients Without or with Cirrhosis

Abstract

Background: No blood test has been shown to be effective in the prediction of primary liver cancer in patients without cirrhosis.

Aim: To construct and internally validate two sequential tests for early prediction of liver cancer. These tests enable an algorithm which could improve the performance of the standard surveillance protocol recommended (imaging with or without AFP), limited to patients with cirrhosis.

Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis in prospectively collected specimens from an ongoing cohort. We designed an early sensitive high-risk test (LCR1) that combined (using Cox model) hepatoprotective proteins (apolipoproteinA1, haptoglobin) with known risk factors (gender, age, gammaglutamyltranspeptidase), and a marker of fibrosis (alpha2-macroglobulin). To increase the specificity, we then combined (LCR2) these components with alpha-fetoprotein.

Results: A total of 9892 patients, 85.9% without cirrhosis, were followed up for 5.9 years [IQR: 4.3-9.4]. LCR1 and LCR2 time-dependent AUROCs were not different in construction and validation randomised subsets. Among 2027 patients with high-LCR1 then high-LCR2, 167 cancers (113 with cirrhosis, 54 without cirrhosis) were detected, that is 12 patients needed to screen one cancer. The negative predictive value was 99.5% (95% CI 99.0-99.7) in the 2026 not screened patients (11 cancers without cirrhosis) higher than the standard surveillance, which detected 113 cancers in 755 patients screened, that is seven patients needed to screen one cancer, but with a lower negative predictive value 98.0% (97.5-98.5; Z = 4.3; P < 0.001) in 3298 not screened patients (42 cancers without cirrhosis).

Conclusions: In patients with chronic liver disease the LCR1 and LCR2 tests identify those with a high risk of liver cancer, including in those without cirrhosis. NCT01927133.

Citing Articles

Comparison of models to predict incident chronic liver disease: a systematic review and external validation in Chinese adults.

Cong X, Song S, Li Y, Song K, MacLeod C, Cheng Y BMC Med. 2024; 22(1):601.

PMID: 39736748 PMC: 11686935. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-024-03754-9.


External Validation of LCR1-LCR2, a Multivariable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Risk Calculator, in a Multiethnic Cohort of Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B.

Poynard T, Lacombe J, Deckmyn O, Peta V, Akhavan S, Zoulim F Gastro Hep Adv. 2024; 1(4):604-617.

PMID: 39132068 PMC: 11308549. DOI: 10.1016/j.gastha.2022.02.008.


Risk stratification and early detection biomarkers for precision HCC screening.

Lee Y, Fujiwara N, Yang J, Hoshida Y Hepatology. 2022; 78(1):319-362.

PMID: 36082510 PMC: 9995677. DOI: 10.1002/hep.32779.


Liver cancer risk-predictive molecular biomarkers specific to clinico-epidemiological contexts.

Kubota N, Fujiwara N, Hoshida Y Adv Cancer Res. 2022; 156:1-37.

PMID: 35961696 PMC: 7616039. DOI: 10.1016/bs.acr.2022.01.005.


HCC risk prediction using biomarkers in non-cirrhotic patients following HCV eradication: Reassuring the patient or the doctor?.

Costentin C, Nahon P JHEP Rep. 2021; 3(4):100320.

PMID: 34308325 PMC: 8283026. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2021.100320.


References
1.
Xu X, Kong H, Song R, Zhai Y, Wu X, Ai W . The effectiveness of noninvasive biomarkers to predict hepatitis B-related significant fibrosis and cirrhosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy. PLoS One. 2014; 9(6):e100182. PMC: 4070977. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100182. View

2.
Guillen M, Gomez-Lechon M, Nakamura T, Castell J . The hepatocyte growth factor regulates the synthesis of acute-phase proteins in human hepatocytes: divergent effect on interleukin-6-stimulated genes. Hepatology. 1996; 23(6):1345-52. DOI: 10.1002/hep.510230609. View

3.
Ganne-Carrie N, Layese R, Bourcier V, Cagnot C, Marcellin P, Guyader D . Nomogram for individualized prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma occurrence in hepatitis C virus cirrhosis (ANRS CO12 CirVir). Hepatology. 2016; 64(4):1136-47. DOI: 10.1002/hep.28702. View

4.
Rehman A, Ahsan H, Khan F . α-2-Macroglobulin: a physiological guardian. J Cell Physiol. 2012; 228(8):1665-75. DOI: 10.1002/jcp.24266. View

5.
Munteanu M, Tiniakos D, Anstee Q, Charlotte F, Marchesini G, Bugianesi E . Diagnostic performance of FibroTest, SteatoTest and ActiTest in patients with NAFLD using the SAF score as histological reference. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2016; 44(8):877-89. PMC: 5113673. DOI: 10.1111/apt.13770. View