» Articles » PMID: 30557392

Use of C-reactive Protein for the Early Prediction of Anastomotic Leak After Esophagectomy: Systematic Review and Bayesian Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2018 Dec 18
PMID 30557392
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Early suspicion, diagnosis, and timely treatment of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy is essential. Retrospective studies have investigated the role of C-reactive protein (CRP) as early marker of anastomotic leakage. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the predictive value of CRP after esophageal resection.

Methods: A literature search was conducted to identify all reports including serial postoperative CRP measurements to predict anastomotic leakage after elective open or minimally invasive esophagectomy. Fully Bayesian meta-analysis was carried out using random-effects model for pooling diagnostic accuracy measures along with CRP cut-off values at different postoperative day.

Results: Five studies published between 2012 and 2018 met the inclusion criteria. Overall, 850 patients were included. Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy was the most common surgical procedure (72.3%) and half of the patients had squamous-cell carcinoma (50.4%). The estimated pooled prevalence of anastomotic leak was 11% (95% CI = 8-14%). The serum CRP level on POD3 and POD5 had comparable diagnostic accuracy with a pooled area under the curve of 0.80 (95% CIs 0.77-0.92) and 0.83 (95% CIs 0.61-0.96), respectively. The derived pooled CRP cut-off values were 17.6 mg/dl on POD 3 and 13.2 mg/dl on POD 5; the negative likelihood ratio were 0.35 (95% CIs 0.096-0.62) and 0.195 (95% CIs 0.04-0.52).

Conclusion: After esophagectomy, a CRP value lower than 17.6 mg/dl on POD3 and 13.2 mg/dl on POD5 combined with reassuring clinical and radiological signs may be useful to rule-out leakage. In the context of ERAS protocols, this may help to avoid contrast radiological studies, anticipate oral feeding, accelerate hospital discharge, and reduce costs.

Citing Articles

Role of Biomarkers in the Diagnosis of Anastomotic Leakage After Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Almutairi F Cureus. 2024; 16(6):e62432.

PMID: 39011204 PMC: 11249052. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.62432.


VAC-Stent in the Treatment of Post-Esophagectomy Anastomotic Leaks: A New "Kid on the Block" Who Marries the Best of Old Techniques-A Review.

DellAnna G, Fanti L, Fanizza J, Bara R, Barchi A, Fasulo E J Clin Med. 2024; 13(13).

PMID: 38999371 PMC: 11242239. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13133805.


Long-Term Impact of Severe Postoperative Complications after Esophagectomy for Cancer: Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis.

Bona D, Manara M, Bonitta G, Guerrazzi G, Guraj J, Lombardo F Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(8).

PMID: 38672550 PMC: 11048031. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16081468.


Complication Prediction after Esophagectomy with Machine Learning.

van de Beld J, Crull D, Mikhal J, Geerdink J, Veldhuis A, Poel M Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(4).

PMID: 38396478 PMC: 10888312. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14040439.


Systemic Inflammatory Response and the Noble and Underwood (NUn) Score as Early Predictors of Anastomotic Leakage after Esophageal Reconstructive Surgery.

Van Daele E, Vanommeslaeghe H, Decostere F, Beckers Perletti L, Beel E, van Nieuwenhove Y J Clin Med. 2024; 13(3).

PMID: 38337519 PMC: 10856250. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13030826.


References
1.
Bonavina L, Scolari F, Aiolfi A, Bonitta G, Sironi A, Saino G . Early outcome of thoracoscopic and hybrid esophagectomy: Propensity-matched comparative analysis. Surgery. 2015; 159(4):1073-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.08.019. View

2.
Cerfolio R, Bryant A, Bass C, Alexander J, Bartolucci A . Fast tracking after Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy. Chest. 2004; 126(4):1187-94. DOI: 10.1378/chest.126.4.1187. View

3.
Halkin A, Reichman J, Schwaber M, Paltiel O, Brezis M . Likelihood ratios: getting diagnostic testing into perspective. QJM. 1998; 91(4):247-58. DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/91.4.247. View

4.
Cao S, Zhao G, Cui J, Dong Q, Qi S, Xin Y . Fast-track rehabilitation program and conventional care after esophagectomy: a retrospective controlled cohort study. Support Care Cancer. 2012; 21(3):707-14. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-012-1570-0. View

5.
Biere S, van Berge Henegouwen M, Bonavina L, Rosman C, Garcia J, Gisbertz S . Predictive factors for post-operative respiratory infections after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: outcome of randomized trial. J Thorac Dis. 2017; 9(Suppl 8):S861-S867. PMC: 5538980. DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2017.06.61. View