» Articles » PMID: 34164541

Progress in the Esophagogastric Anastomosis and the Challenges of Minimally Invasive Thoracoscopic Surgery

Overview
Journal Ann Transl Med
Date 2021 Jun 24
PMID 34164541
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The esophagogastric anastomosis is most commonly performed to restore digestive tract continuity after esophagectomy for cancer. Despite a long history of clinical research and development of high-tech staplers, this procedure is still feared by most surgeons and associated with a 10% leakage rate. Among specific factors that may contribute to failure of the esophageal anastomosis are the absence of serosa layer, longitudinal orientation of muscle fibers, and ischemia of the gastric conduit. It has recently been suggested that the gut microbiome may influence the healing process of the anastomosis through the presence of collagenolytic bacterial strains, indicating that suture breakdown is not only a matter of collagen biosynthesis. The esophagogastric anastomosis can be performed either in the chest or neck, and can be completely hand-sewn, completely stapled (circular or linear stapler), or semi-mechanical (linear stapler posterior wall and hand-sewn anterior wall). Because of the lack of randomized clinical trials, no conclusive evidence is available, and the debate between the hand-sewn and the stapling technique is still ongoing even in the present era of robotic surgery. Centralization of care has improved the overall postoperative outcomes of esophagectomy, but the esophagogastric anastomosis remains the Achille's heel of the procedure. More research and network collaboration of experts is needed to improve safety and clinical outcomes.

Citing Articles

Esophagectomy in patients with liver cirrhosis: systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcomes.

Sozzi A, Aiolfi A, Bonitta G, Bona D, Bonavina L, Biondi A Updates Surg. 2024; 77(1):143-152.

PMID: 39718689 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-024-02060-6.


Does Indocyanine Green Utilization during Esophagectomy Prevent Anastomotic Leaks? Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Sozzi A, Bona D, Yeow M, Habeeb T, Bonitta G, Manara M J Clin Med. 2024; 13(16).

PMID: 39201041 PMC: 11355508. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13164899.


Attenuation of esophageal anastomotic stricture through remote ischemic conditioning in a rat model.

Youn J, Lee H, Ko D, Kim H Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):18481.

PMID: 39122787 PMC: 11315918. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-69386-4.


Placing vacuum sponges in esophageal anastomotic leaks - how we do it.

Hentschel F, Mollenhauer G, Siemssen B, Paasch C, Mantke R, Luth S Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024; 409(1):86.

PMID: 38441680 PMC: 10914858. DOI: 10.1007/s00423-024-03272-5.


Robot-assisted esophagectomy with robot-sewn intrathoracic anastomosis (Ivor Lewis): surgical technique and early results.

Marano A, Salomone S, Pellegrino L, Geretto P, Robella M, Borghi F Updates Surg. 2022; 75(4):941-952.

PMID: 36510101 PMC: 9744375. DOI: 10.1007/s13304-022-01439-7.


References
1.
Bonavina L, Scolari F, Aiolfi A, Bonitta G, Sironi A, Saino G . Early outcome of thoracoscopic and hybrid esophagectomy: Propensity-matched comparative analysis. Surgery. 2015; 159(4):1073-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.08.019. View

2.
Reddy R, Weir W, Barnett S, Heiden B, Orringer M, Lin J . Increased Variance in Oral and Gastric Microbiome Correlates With Esophagectomy Anastomotic Leak. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018; 105(3):865-870. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.08.061. View

3.
Sdralis E, Tzaferai A, Davakis S, Syllaios A, Kordzadeh A, Lorenzi B . Reinforcement of intrathoracic oesophago-gastric anastomosis with fibrin sealant (Tisseel®) in oesophagectomy for cancer: A prospective comparative study. Am J Surg. 2019; 219(1):123-128. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.06.013. View

4.
Hyoju S, Adriaansens C, Wienholts K, Sharma A, Keskey R, Arnold W . Low-fat/high-fibre diet prehabilitation improves anastomotic healing via the microbiome: an experimental model. Br J Surg. 2019; 107(6):743-755. PMC: 7875206. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11388. View

5.
STEICHEN F . Mechanical sutures in esophageal replacement: fashion or resource?. Dis Esophagus. 2001; 14(1):1-12. DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2001.00143.x. View