» Articles » PMID: 30555372

Measuring Multiple Text Integration: A Review

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2018 Dec 18
PMID 30555372
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Multiple text integration is an important skill in modern society, required in heterogeneous situations, across many disciplines and in daily life. It is a complex skill that builds on bottom-up and top-down processes (Britt and Rouet, 2012). As a complex skill it has been measured in the literature using different techniques. To date, the different ways in which researchers have defined and operationalized the term have not been reviewed. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to review how multiple text integration has been theoretically and empirically assessed. The current paper reviews which texts were typically used, which aspects of integration were assessed, and with which scoring rubrics. Finally, we propose that despite the diverse use of tasks, important features of multiple text integration are missing from current research.

Citing Articles

Measuring multiple-source based academic writing self-efficacy.

Braten I, Haverkamp Y, Latini N, Stromso H Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1212567.

PMID: 37519373 PMC: 10373877. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1212567.


Beyond the Distributed Practice Effect: Is Distributed Learning Also Effective for Learning With Non-repeated Text Materials?.

Greving C, Richter T Front Psychol. 2021; 12:685245.

PMID: 34721138 PMC: 8554015. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.685245.


The Contribution of Executive Functions When Reading Multiple Texts: A Systematic Literature Review.

Tarchi C, Ruffini C, Pecini C Front Psychol. 2021; 12:716463.

PMID: 34646206 PMC: 8503540. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.716463.


The influence of thinking dispositions on integration and recall of multiple texts.

Tarchi C, Villalon R Br J Educ Psychol. 2021; 91(4):1498-1516.

PMID: 34152008 PMC: 9292243. DOI: 10.1111/bjep.12432.


More Than (Single) Text Comprehension? - On University Students' Understanding of Multiple Documents.

Mahlow N, Hahnel C, Kroehne U, Artelt C, Goldhammer F, Schoor C Front Psychol. 2020; 11:562450.

PMID: 33192832 PMC: 7644972. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.562450.


References
1.
Braasch J, Rouet J, Vibert N, Britt M . Readers' use of source information in text comprehension. Mem Cognit. 2011; 40(3):450-65. DOI: 10.3758/s13421-011-0160-6. View

2.
Hastings P, Hughes S, Magliano J, Goldman S, Lawless K . Assessing the use of multiple sources in student essays. Behav Res Methods. 2012; 44(3):622-33. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-012-0214-0. View

3.
Braten I, Ferguson L, Stromso H, Anmarkrud O . Students working with multiple conflicting documents on a scientific issue: relations between epistemic cognition while reading and sourcing and argumentation in essays. Br J Educ Psychol. 2014; 84(Pt 1):58-85. DOI: 10.1111/bjep.12005. View

4.
Beker K, Jolles D, Lorch Jr R, van den Broek P . Learning from texts: activation of information from previous texts during reading. Read Writ. 2016; 29:1161-1178. PMC: 4875937. DOI: 10.1007/s11145-016-9630-3. View

5.
Linderholm T, Dobson J, Yarbrough M . The benefit of self-testing and interleaving for synthesizing concepts across multiple physiology texts. Adv Physiol Educ. 2016; 40(3):329-34. DOI: 10.1152/advan.00157.2015. View