» Articles » PMID: 27340334

Learning from Texts: Activation of Information from Previous Texts During Reading

Overview
Journal Read Writ
Date 2016 Jun 25
PMID 27340334
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Learning often involves integration of information from multiple texts. The aim of the current study was to determine whether relevant information from previously read texts is spontaneously activated during reading, allowing for integration between texts (experiment 1 and 2), and whether this process is related to the representation of the texts (experiment 2). In both experiments, texts with inconsistent target sentences were preceded by texts that either did or did not contain explanations that resolved the inconsistencies. In experiment 1, the reading times of the target sentences introducing inconsistencies were faster if the preceding text contained an explanation for the inconsistency than if it did not. This result demonstrates that relevant information from a prior text is spontaneously activated when the target sentence is read. In experiment 2 free recall was used to gain insight into the representation after reading. The reading time results for experiment 2 replicated the reading time results for experiment 1. However, the effects on reading times did not translate to measurable differences in text representations after reading. This research extends our knowledge about the processes involved in multiple text comprehension: Prior text information is spontaneously activated during reading, thereby enabling integration between different texts.

Citing Articles

Measuring Multiple Text Integration: A Review.

Primor L, Katzir T Front Psychol. 2018; 9:2294.

PMID: 30555372 PMC: 6282655. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02294.


Latent topics resonance in scientific literature and commentaries: evidences from natural language processing approach.

Wang T, Zhou Z, Hu X, Liu Z, Ding Y, Cai Z Heliyon. 2018; 4(6):e00659.

PMID: 29955672 PMC: 6019969. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00659.

References
1.
Rojahn K, Pettigrew T . Memory for schema-relevant information: a meta-analytic resolution. Br J Soc Psychol. 1992; 31 ( Pt 2):81-109. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1992.tb00958.x. View

2.
Rayner K, Kambe G, Duffy S . The effect of clause wrap-up on eye movements during reading. Q J Exp Psychol A. 2000; 53(4):1061-80. DOI: 10.1080/713755934. View

3.
Seifert C, McKoon G, Abelson R, Ratcliff R . Memory connections between thematically similar episodes. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1986; 12(2):220-31. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.12.2.220. View

4.
OBrien E . Antecedent search processes and the structure of text. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1987; 13(2):278-90. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.13.2.278. View

5.
Sakamoto Y, Love B . Schematic influences on category learning and recognition memory. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2004; 133(4):534-53. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.133.4.534. View