» Articles » PMID: 30552572

Sex Differences in Somatomotor Representations of Others' Pain: a Permutation-based Analysis

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2018 Dec 16
PMID 30552572
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Sex differences in empathy for pain have been repeatedly observed. However, it is unclear whether this is due to sex differences in "bottom-up" somatomotor representations of others' pain (self-other resonance) or to "top-down" prefrontal control of such responses. Here, we provide data from 70 subjects suggesting that sex differences in empathy for pain lie primarily in pre-reflective, bottom-up resonance mechanisms. Subjects viewed a right hand pierced by a needle during fMRI. They also filled out a self-report measure of trait empathy, the Interpersonal Reactivity Index. A permutation-based analysis (FSL's Randomise) found that females showed greater signal in a cluster in primary somatomotor cortex that includes the motor hand area. No significant differences were observed in other task-implicated areas. An examination of condition-specific parameter estimates found that this difference was due to reduced signal in this cluster in males. No significant differences in resting connectivity or within-task (generalized psychophysiological interaction analysis or gPPI) dynamic connectivity of this region with prefrontal areas were observed. While female subjects scored higher on affective subscales of the IRI, there were no sex differences in Perspective-Taking, the primary index of cognitive, top-down empathy processes. These findings suggest that localized internal somatomotor representations of others' pain, a functional index of bottom-up resonance processes, are stronger in female subjects.

Citing Articles

Pathology of pain and its implications for therapeutic interventions.

Cao B, Xu Q, Shi Y, Zhao R, Li H, Zheng J Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2024; 9(1):155.

PMID: 38851750 PMC: 11162504. DOI: 10.1038/s41392-024-01845-w.


The Greek Jefferson Scale of Empathy-Medical Student Version (JSE-S): Psychometric Properties and Its Associated Factors.

Voultsos P, Galanis P, Dafni M, Velonaki V, Andreou G, Kovatsi L Behav Sci (Basel). 2024; 14(3).

PMID: 38540497 PMC: 10968493. DOI: 10.3390/bs14030195.


Individual differences in time-varying and stationary brain connectivity during movie watching from childhood to early adulthood: Age, sex, and behavioral associations.

Di X, Xu T, Uddin L, Biswal B Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2023; 63:101280.

PMID: 37480715 PMC: 10393546. DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2023.101280.


Are women more empathetic than men? Questionnaire and EEG estimations of sex/gender differences in empathic ability.

Pang C, Li W, Zhou Y, Gao T, Han S Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2023; 18(1).

PMID: 36807483 PMC: 9976760. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsad008.


Individual differences in time-varying and stationary brain connectivity during movie watching from childhood to early adulthood: age, sex, and behavioral associations.

Di X, Xu T, Uddin L, Biswal B bioRxiv. 2023; .

PMID: 36778481 PMC: 9915503. DOI: 10.1101/2023.01.30.526311.


References
1.
Nicholls T, Petrila J . Gender and psychopathy: an overview of important issues and introduction to the special issue. Behav Sci Law. 2005; 23(6):729-41. DOI: 10.1002/bsl.677. View

2.
Groen Y, Wijers A, Tucha O, Althaus M . Are there sex differences in ERPs related to processing empathy-evoking pictures?. Neuropsychologia. 2012; 51(1):142-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.11.012. View

3.
Christov-Moore L, Sugiyama T, Grigaityte K, Iacoboni M . Increasing generosity by disrupting prefrontal cortex. Soc Neurosci. 2016; 12(2):174-181. PMC: 5593255. DOI: 10.1080/17470919.2016.1154105. View

4.
Yang C, Decety J, Lee S, Chen C, Cheng Y . Gender differences in the mu rhythm during empathy for pain: an electroencephalographic study. Brain Res. 2008; 1251:176-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.11.062. View

5.
Singer T, Seymour B, ODoherty J, Stephan K, Dolan R, Frith C . Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others. Nature. 2006; 439(7075):466-9. PMC: 2636868. DOI: 10.1038/nature04271. View