» Articles » PMID: 22245638

Distributed Processing; Distributed Functions?

Overview
Journal Neuroimage
Specialty Radiology
Date 2012 Jan 17
PMID 22245638
Citations 45
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

After more than twenty years busily mapping the human brain, what have we learned from neuroimaging? This review (coda) considers this question from the point of view of structure-function relationships and the two cornerstones of functional neuroimaging; functional segregation and integration. Despite remarkable advances and insights into the brain's functional architecture, the earliest and simplest challenge in human brain mapping remains unresolved: We do not have a principled way to map brain function onto its structure in a way that speaks directly to cognitive neuroscience. Having said this, there are distinct clues about how this might be done: First, there is a growing appreciation of the role of functional integration in the distributed nature of neuronal processing. Second, there is an emerging interest in data-driven cognitive ontologies, i.e., that are internally consistent with functional anatomy. We will focus this review on the growing momentum in the fields of functional connectivity and distributed brain responses and consider this in the light of meta-analyses that use very large data sets to disclose large-scale structure-function mappings in the human brain.

Citing Articles

Deep-learning based Embedding of Functional Connectivity Profiles for Precision Functional Mapping.

Tu J, Kim J, Luckett P, Adeyemo B, Shimony J, Elison J bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39975052 PMC: 11838398. DOI: 10.1101/2025.01.29.635570.


A network control theory pipeline for studying the dynamics of the structural connectome.

Parkes L, Kim J, Stiso J, Brynildsen J, Cieslak M, Covitz S Nat Protoc. 2024; 19(12):3721-3749.

PMID: 39075309 DOI: 10.1038/s41596-024-01023-w.


NREM sleep brain networks modulate cognitive recovery from sleep deprivation.

Lee K, Wang Y, Cross N, Jegou A, Razavipour F, Pomares F bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39005401 PMC: 11244911. DOI: 10.1101/2024.06.28.601285.


Using network control theory to study the dynamics of the structural connectome.

Parkes L, Kim J, Stiso J, Brynildsen J, Cieslak M, Covitz S bioRxiv. 2023; .

PMID: 37662395 PMC: 10473719. DOI: 10.1101/2023.08.23.554519.


Hierarchical overlapping modular structure in the human cerebral cortex improves individual identification.

Fan Y, Wang R, Yi C, Zhou L, Wu Y iScience. 2023; 26(5):106575.

PMID: 37250302 PMC: 10214405. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106575.


References
1.
Toro R, Fox P, Paus T . Functional coactivation map of the human brain. Cereb Cortex. 2008; 18(11):2553-9. PMC: 2567424. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhn014. View

2.
Honey C, Sporns O, Cammoun L, Gigandet X, Thiran J, Meuli R . Predicting human resting-state functional connectivity from structural connectivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009; 106(6):2035-40. PMC: 2634800. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0811168106. View

3.
Dayan P, Hinton G, Neal R, Zemel R . The Helmholtz machine. Neural Comput. 1995; 7(5):889-904. DOI: 10.1162/neco.1995.7.5.889. View

4.
Grol M, Majdandzic J, Stephan K, Verhagen L, Dijkerman H, Bekkering H . Parieto-frontal connectivity during visually guided grasping. J Neurosci. 2007; 27(44):11877-87. PMC: 2703728. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3923-07.2007. View

5.
Marreiros A, Kiebel S, Daunizeau J, Harrison L, Friston K . Population dynamics under the Laplace assumption. Neuroimage. 2008; 44(3):701-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.10.008. View