» Articles » PMID: 30539274

Surface Contamination in the Operating Room: Use of Adenosine Triphosphate Monitoring

Overview
Journal J Anesth
Specialty Anesthesiology
Date 2018 Dec 13
PMID 30539274
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: We prospectively investigated contamination of high-contact surfaces in the operating room (OR) using adenosine triphosphate (ATP) monitoring. We tested whether contamination would increase from morning (AM) to afternoon (PM), despite cleaning between cases. Second, we compared the degree of OR contamination to non-OR control sites.

Methods: ORs with high case volumes were selected for the study. Ten sites in each OR were swabbed using the AccuPoint HC ATP Sanitation Monitoring device, which provided a numerical measure of contamination (relative light units, RLUs). According to the manufacturer, surfaces are considered clean at ≤ 400 RLUs. AM measurements were taken before the start of surgical cases and PM measurements were taken after cases were completed.

Results: Eighty morning and 70 afternoon samples were obtained from 8 ORs. Apart from the OR floor, laryngoscope handles had the highest level of morning contamination (1204 RLUs, interquartile range 345, 2603), with 75% of AM samples and 100% of PM samples exceeding 400 RLUs. This contamination was comparable to hospital toilet seats (87% of samples exceeding 400 RLUs). No sites showed statistically significant increases in contamination from AM to PM.

Conclusion: Apart from the OR floors, laryngoscope handles emerged as a key OR site where improved cleaning practices may reduce cross-contamination risk. While some sites showed increased contamination over the course of the day, none of these met statistical significance thereby offering tentative evidence that current cleaning practices during case turnover are effective for most sites.

Citing Articles

Assessment of Soiling on Highly Touched Clinical Surfaces in Intensive Care Units.

Alvim A, Pimenta F, Coelho A, Carbogim F, Varoto A, Ferreira A Florence Nightingale J Nurs. 2023; 31(3):188-193.

PMID: 37847014 PMC: 10724769. DOI: 10.5152/FNJN.2023.23027.


An alternative approach for the decontamination of hospital settings.

Moccia G, Motta O, Pironti C, Proto A, Capunzo M, De Caro F J Infect Public Health. 2020; 13(12):2038-2044.

PMID: 33289645 PMC: 7577675. DOI: 10.1016/j.jiph.2020.09.020.


Development and Improvement of an Effective Method for Air and Surfaces Disinfection with Ozone Gas as a Decontaminating Agent.

Moccia G, De Caro F, Pironti C, Boccia G, Capunzo M, Borrelli A Medicina (Kaunas). 2020; 56(11).

PMID: 33143010 PMC: 7694113. DOI: 10.3390/medicina56110578.

References
1.
Amour J, Le Manach Y, Borel M, Lenfant F, Nicolas-Robin A, Carillion A . Comparison of single-use and reusable metal laryngoscope blades for orotracheal intubation during rapid sequence induction of anesthesia: a multicenter cluster randomized study. Anesthesiology. 2010; 112(2):325-32. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181c92111. View

2.
Nante N, Ceriale E, Messina G, Lenzi D, Manzi P . Effectiveness of ATP bioluminescence to assess hospital cleaning: a review. J Prev Med Hyg. 2017; 58(2):E177-E183. PMC: 5584088. View

3.
Alfa M, Fatima I, Olson N . The adenosine triphosphate test is a rapid and reliable audit tool to assess manual cleaning adequacy of flexible endoscope channels. Am J Infect Control. 2012; 41(3):249-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2012.03.015. View

4.
Birnbach D, Rosen L, Fitzpatrick M, Carling P, Arheart K, Munoz-Price L . A New Approach to Pathogen Containment in the Operating Room: Sheathing the Laryngoscope After Intubation. Anesth Analg. 2015; 121(5):1209-14. DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000854. View

5.
Sherman J, Raibley 4th L, Eckelman M . Life Cycle Assessment and Costing Methods for Device Procurement: Comparing Reusable and Single-Use Disposable Laryngoscopes. Anesth Analg. 2018; 127(2):434-443. DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002683. View