» Articles » PMID: 30535539

Wide Diameter Bone-anchored Hearing System Implants: a Comparison of Long-term Follow-up Data Between Tissue Reduction and Tissue Preservation Techniques

Overview
Date 2018 Dec 12
PMID 30535539
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To present long-term data on the Wide Ponto implant bone-anchored hearing system (BAHS) in regards to implant stability, soft tissue reaction and implant loss for two case series undergone either the tissue reduction- or the tissue preservation surgical technique.

Methods: Comparison of two consecutive, prospective case series. Each case series enrolled 24 patients. The case series underwent one-stage implantation of the Wide Ponto implant BAHS using either a linear incision technique with subcutaneous reduction or a linear incision technique without subcutaneous reduction. Implant stability quotient (ISQ) values were measured using resonance frequency analysis and soft tissue reactions were graded according to Holgers' classification system. Follow-up visits were performed at 10 days, 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months and annually up to 4 years (tissue preservation) or 5 years (tissue reduction) postoperatively.

Results: The two case series had homogenous patient populations and followed an identical postoperative scheme. The ISQ values increased consistently the first 12 months for both groups (p ≤ 0.001), and were higher in the tissue preservation case series, (p = 0.04, 9 mm abutment). More than 91% of the soft tissue observations were assessed as Holgers' grade 0 or 1. One implant (2.1%) was lost due to trauma.

Conclusion: In both case series, the Wide Ponto implant showed increasing implant stability during the follow-up period from the time of surgery, irrespective of surgical technique, indicating good osseointegration. Soft tissue reactions were rare and of minor severity. Implant survival was high.

Citing Articles

Prospective 5 year outcomes of different implant designs and surgical techniques in 68 patients with bone anchored hearing implants.

Vijverberg M, Caspers C, Kruyt I, Mylanus E, Hol M Clin Otolaryngol. 2022; 48(1):65-69.

PMID: 36054740 PMC: 10087793. DOI: 10.1111/coa.13974.


Evaluation of a New Drill System for Placement of Percutaneous Bone Conduction Devices.

Strijbos R, Straatman L, Stokroos R, Johansson M Front Surg. 2022; 9:858117.

PMID: 35388366 PMC: 8977416. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.858117.


Long-Term Outcomes of the Minimally Invasive Ponto Surgery vs. Linear Incision Technique With Soft Tissue Preservation for Installation of Percutaneous Bone Conduction Devices.

Strijbos R, Straatman L, Calon T, Johansson M, de Bruijn A, van den Berge H Front Neurol. 2021; 12:632987.

PMID: 33716934 PMC: 7945693. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.632987.


Ten years of experience with the Ponto bone-anchored hearing system-A systematic literature review.

Lagerkvist H, Carvalho K, Holmberg M, Petersson U, Cremers C, Hultcrantz M Clin Otolaryngol. 2020; 45(5):667-680.

PMID: 32386454 PMC: 7496709. DOI: 10.1111/coa.13556.

References
1.
Reyes R, Tjellstrom A, Granstrom G . Evaluation of implant losses and skin reactions around extraoral bone-anchored implants: A 0- to 8-year follow-up. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000; 122(2):272-6. DOI: 10.1016/S0194-5998(00)70255-5. View

2.
Strijbos R, Bom S, Zwerver S, Hol M . Percutaneous bone-anchored hearing implant surgery: dermatome versus linear incision technique. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016; 274(1):109-117. PMC: 5222941. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-016-4210-3. View

3.
Hultcrantz M . Outcome of the bone-anchored hearing aid procedure without skin thinning: a prospective clinical trial. Otol Neurotol. 2011; 32(7):1134-9. DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31822a1c47. View

4.
Tjellstrom A, Lindstrom J, HALLEN O, Albrektsson T, Branemark P . Osseointegrated titanium implants in the temporal bone. A clinical study on bone-anchored hearing aids. Am J Otol. 1981; 2(4):304-10. View

5.
Dun C, de Wolf M, Hol M, Wigren S, Eeg-Olofsson M, Green K . Stability, survival, and tolerability of a novel baha implant system: six-month data from a multicenter clinical investigation. Otol Neurotol. 2011; 32(6):1001-7. DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3182267e9c. View