» Articles » PMID: 21817939

Outcome of the Bone-anchored Hearing Aid Procedure Without Skin Thinning: a Prospective Clinical Trial

Overview
Journal Otol Neurotol
Date 2011 Aug 6
PMID 21817939
Citations 38
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the outcome of Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid surgery without skin thinning, a test group with direct implantation without such thinning was compared with a control group that underwent the traditional procedure.

Study Design: This was a single-center, prospective clinical trial designed to evaluate a novel approach to Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid implantation. Eligible patients were enrolled consecutively in the test group or selected to be age-matched controls.

Setting: University Hospital.

Patients: Eighteen adult patients, suffering from hearing loss, suitable for implantable hearing aid.

Methods: Single-step surgery was performed on 18 patients under local anesthesia. In 9 of these, a linear incision was made, a hole was punched through the skin above the bone-anchored implant, and a longer abutment (8.5-12 mm) was introduced, whereas the other 9 were subjected to the standard protocol, using a dermatome and skin thinning. All of the patients were followed for 12 months.

Results: The test group exhibited good preservation of the tissue, no increasing skin reactions and no adverse events. The time required for this surgery was reduced, as was their healing time. These patients also experienced less numbness and pain in the surrounding area and had an improved cosmetic outcome. MAIN OUTCOME AND CONCLUSION: This clinical trial indicates that introduction of the abutment to the osseointegrated screw directly through the skin, without skin thinning, could be beneficial. This approach had fewer negative effects than the conventional procedure during the 12- month follow-up period.

Citing Articles

Hearing Performance and Soft-Tissue Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Ponto Surgery and Local Anesthesia in Children with Unilateral Craniofacial Malformation.

Leone A, Castilho A, Danieli F, Calil D, Almeida K Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025; 29(1):1-7.

PMID: 39871954 PMC: 11772073. DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1788910.


Bone-conduction Hearing Aids: A Scoping Review.

Manuelli M, Migliorelli A, Moretti C, Borin M, Malagutti N, Bianchini C Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024; 76(6):5071-5079.

PMID: 39559027 PMC: 11569379. DOI: 10.1007/s12070-024-05042-7.


Minimally invasive surgery as a new clinical standard for bone anchored hearing implants-real-world data from 10 years of follow-up and 228 surgeries.

Cruz L, Danieli F, Hakansson M, Johansson M, Dos Santos F, Reis A Front Surg. 2023; 10:1209927.

PMID: 37465065 PMC: 10351910. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1209927.


Bone-Anchored Hearing Implants: Surgical and Audiological Comparison of Different Surgical Techniques.

Torun Topcu M, Mutlu B, Celik S, Celikgun B, Mutlu A, Kalcioglu M Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022; 26(4):e649-e656.

PMID: 36405458 PMC: 9668411. DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1742765.


Prospective 5 year outcomes of different implant designs and surgical techniques in 68 patients with bone anchored hearing implants.

Vijverberg M, Caspers C, Kruyt I, Mylanus E, Hol M Clin Otolaryngol. 2022; 48(1):65-69.

PMID: 36054740 PMC: 10087793. DOI: 10.1111/coa.13974.