» Articles » PMID: 30532658

Dosimetric and Monte Carlo Verification of Jaws-only IMRT Plans Calculated by the Collapsed Cone Convolution Algorithm for Head and Neck Cancers

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2018 Dec 12
PMID 30532658
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study is to verify the Prowess Panther jaws-only intensity modulated radiation therapy (JO-IMRT) treatment planning (TP) by comparing the TP dose distributions for head-and-neck (H&N) cancer with the ones simulated by Monte Carlo (MC).

Background: To date, dose distributions planned using JO-IMRT for H&N patients were found superior to the corresponding three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) plans. Dosimetry of the JO-IMRT plans were also experimentally verified using an ionization chamber, MapCHECK 2, and Octavius 4D and good agreements were shown.

Materials And Methods: Dose distributions of 15 JO-IMRT plans of nasopharyngeal patients were recalculated using the EGSnrc Monte Carlo code. The clinical photon beams were simulated using the BEAMnrc. The absorbed dose to patients treated by fixed-field IMRT was computed using the DOSXYZnrc. The simulated dose distributions were then compared with the ones calculated by the Collapsed Cone Convolution (CCC) algorithm on the TPS, using the relative dose error comparison and the gamma index using global methods implemented in PTW-VeriSoft with 3%/3 mm, 2%/2 mm, 1%/1 mm criteria.

Results: There is a good agreement between the MC and TPS dose. The average gamma passing rates were 93.3 ± 3.1%, 92.8 ± 3.2%, 92.4 ± 3.4% based on the 3%/3 mm, 2%/2 mm, 1%/1 mm criteria, respectively.

Conclusions: According to the results, it is concluded that the CCC algorithm was adequate for most of the IMRT H&N cases where the target was not immediately adjacent to the critical structures.

Citing Articles

Assessment of the Dosimetric Index from IMRT and Rapid arc Plan for Oropharyngeal Cancer with Simultaneous Integrated Boost (SIB) Technique in Combination with EUD-based NTCP and TCP Radiobiological Models.

Dashnamoorthy S, Jeyasingh E, Rajamanickam K, Ahmed I Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2024; 25(5):1515-1528.

PMID: 38809623 PMC: 11318801. DOI: 10.31557/APJCP.2024.25.5.1515.


Dosimetric and radiobiological comparison in head-and-neck radiotherapy using JO-IMRT and 3D-CRT.

Tai D, Oanh L, Phuong P, Sulieman A, Abolaban F, Omer H Saudi J Biol Sci. 2022; 29(8):103336.

PMID: 35754762 PMC: 9213241. DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2022.103336.

References
1.
Francescon P, Cora S, Chiovati P . Dose verification of an IMRT treatment planning system with the BEAM EGS4-based Monte Carlo code. Med Phys. 2003; 30(2):144-57. DOI: 10.1118/1.1538236. View

2.
Pawlicki T, Ma C . Monte Carlo simulation for MLC-based intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Med Dosim. 2001; 26(2):157-68. DOI: 10.1016/s0958-3947(01)00061-9. View

3.
Earl M, Afghan M, Yu C, Jiang Z, Shepard D . Jaws-only IMRT using direct aperture optimization. Med Phys. 2007; 34(1):307-14. DOI: 10.1118/1.2403966. View

4.
Sakthi N, Keall P, Mihaylov I, Wu Q, Wu Y, F Williamson J . Monte Carlo-based dosimetry of head-and-neck patients treated with SIB-IMRT. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006; 64(3):968-77. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.09.049. View

5.
Deasy J, Blanco A, Clark V . CERR: a computational environment for radiotherapy research. Med Phys. 2003; 30(5):979-85. DOI: 10.1118/1.1568978. View