» Articles » PMID: 30503619

Tissue-Specific Cis-Regulatory Divergence Implicates EloF in Inhibiting Interspecies Mating in Drosophila

Overview
Journal Curr Biol
Publisher Cell Press
Specialty Biology
Date 2018 Dec 4
PMID 30503619
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Reproductive isolation is a key component of speciation. In many insects, a major driver of this isolation is cuticular hydrocarbon pheromones, which help to identify potential intraspecific mates [1-3]. When the distributions of related species overlap, there may be strong selection on mate choice for intraspecific partners [4-9] because interspecific hybridization carries significant fitness costs [10]. Drosophila has been a key model for the investigation of reproductive isolation; although both male and female mate choices have been extensively investigated [6, 11-16], the genes underlying species recognition remain largely unknown. To explore the molecular mechanisms underlying Drosophila speciation, we measured tissue-specific cis-regulatory divergence using RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) in D. simulans × D. sechellia hybrids. By focusing on cis-regulatory changes specific to female oenocytes, the tissue that produces cuticular hydrocarbons, we rapidly identified a small number of candidate genes. We found that one of these, the fatty acid elongase eloF, broadly affects the hydrocarbons present on D. sechellia and D. melanogaster females, as well as the propensity of D. simulans males to mate with them. Therefore, cis-regulatory changes in eloF may be a major driver in the sexual isolation of D. simulans from multiple other species. Our RNA-seq approach proved to be far more efficient than quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping in identifying candidate genes; the same framework can be used to pinpoint candidate drivers of cis-regulatory divergence in traits differing between any interfertile species.

Citing Articles

Two major-effect loci influence interspecific mating in females of the sibling species, Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia.

Lu K, Erezyilmaz D G3 (Bethesda). 2024; 15(2).

PMID: 39607704 PMC: 11797031. DOI: 10.1093/g3journal/jkae279.


Regulatory Changes in the Fatty Acid Elongase Underlie the Evolution of Sex-specific Pheromone Profiles in .

Luo Y, Takau A, Li J, Fan T, Hopkins B, Le Y bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39464098 PMC: 11507777. DOI: 10.1101/2024.10.09.617394.


Evolution and genetics of accessory gland transcriptome divergence between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.

Majane A, Cridland J, Blair L, Begun D Genetics. 2024; 227(2).

PMID: 38518250 PMC: 11151936. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/iyae039.


Cell-type-specific -regulatory divergence in gene expression and chromatin accessibility revealed by human-chimpanzee hybrid cells.

Wang B, Starr A, Fraser H Elife. 2024; 12.

PMID: 38358392 PMC: 10942608. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.89594.


Allele-specific expression reveals genetic drivers of tissue regeneration in mice.

Mack K, Talbott H, Griffin M, Parker J, Guardino N, Spielman A Cell Stem Cell. 2023; 30(10):1368-1381.e6.

PMID: 37714154 PMC: 10592051. DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2023.08.010.


References
1.
Gleason J, James R, Wicker-Thomas C, Ritchie M . Identification of quantitative trait loci function through analysis of multiple cuticular hydrocarbons differing between Drosophila simulans and Drosophila sechellia females. Heredity (Edinb). 2009; 103(5):416-24. DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2009.79. View

2.
Noor M . Speciation driven by natural selection in Drosophila. Nature. 1995; 375(6533):674-5. DOI: 10.1038/375674a0. View

3.
Fang S, Ting C, Lee C, Chu K, Wang C, Tsaur S . Molecular evolution and functional diversification of fatty acid desaturases after recurrent gene duplication in Drosophila. Mol Biol Evol. 2009; 26(7):1447-56. PMC: 2693736. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msp057. View

4.
Edward D, Chapman T . The evolution and significance of male mate choice. Trends Ecol Evol. 2011; 26(12):647-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.07.012. View

5.
Coyne J, Elwyn S, Rolan-Alvarez E . Impact of experimental design on Drosophila sexual isolation studies: direct effects and comparison to field hybridization data. Evolution. 2006; 59(12):2588-601. View