» Articles » PMID: 30499113

A Combination of Visudyne and a Lipid-anchored Liposomal Formulation of Benzoporphyrin Derivative Enhances Photodynamic Therapy Efficacy in a 3D Model for Ovarian Cancer

Overview
Date 2018 Dec 1
PMID 30499113
Citations 40
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A major objective in developing new treatment approaches for lethal tumors is to reduce toxicity to normal tissues while maintaining therapeutic efficacy. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) provides a mechanistically distinct approach to treat tumors without the systemic toxicity of chemotherapy drugs. PDT involves the light-based activation of a small molecule, a photosensitizer (PS), to generate reactive molecular species (RMS) that are toxic to target tissue. Depending on the PS localization, various cellular and subcellular components can be targeted, causing selective photodamage. It has been shown that targeted lysosomal photodamage followed by, or simultaneous with, mitochondrial photodamage using two different PS results in a considerable enhancement in PDT efficacy. Here, two liposomal formulations of benzoporphyrin derivative (BPD): (1) Visudyne (clinically approved) and (2) an in-house formulation entrapping a lipid conjugate of BPD are used in combination with direct PS localization to mitochondria, endoplasmic reticulum and lysosomes, enabling simultaneous photodamage to all three organelles using a single wavelength of light. Building on findings by our group, and others, this study demonstrates, for the first time in a 3D model for ovarian cancer, that BPD-mediated photodestruction of lysosomes and mitochondria/ER significantly enhances PDT efficacy at lower light doses than treatment with either PS formulation alone.

Citing Articles

Navigating the Clinical Landscape of Liposomal Therapeutics in Cancer Treatment.

Kozak A, Lavrih E, Mikhaylov G, Turk B, Vasiljeva O Pharmaceutics. 2025; 17(2).

PMID: 40006643 PMC: 11859495. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics17020276.


Engineering photodynamics for treatment, priming and imaging.

Obaid G, Celli J, Broekgaarden M, Bulin A, Uusimaa P, Pogue B Nat Rev Bioeng. 2025; 2(9):752-769.

PMID: 39927170 PMC: 11801064. DOI: 10.1038/s44222-024-00196-z.


Advancements in nanotechnology-driven photodynamic and photothermal therapies: mechanistic insights and synergistic approaches for cancer treatment.

Shabnum S, Siranjeevi R, Raj C, Saravanan A, Vickram A, Chopra H RSC Adv. 2024; 14(52):38952-38995.

PMID: 39659608 PMC: 11629304. DOI: 10.1039/d4ra07114j.


Fractionated photoimmunotherapy stimulates an anti-tumour immune response: an integrated mathematical and in vitro study.

Zahid M, Waguespack M, Harman R, Kercher E, Nath S, Hasan T Br J Cancer. 2024; 131(8):1378-1386.

PMID: 39261715 PMC: 11473784. DOI: 10.1038/s41416-024-02844-y.


A BODIPY-Naphtholimine-BF Dyad for Precision Photodynamic Therapy, Targeting, and Dual Imaging of Endoplasmic Reticulum and Lipid Droplets in Cancer.

Chauhan N, Koli M, Ghosh R, Majumdar A, Ghosh A, Ghanty T JACS Au. 2024; 4(8):2838-2852.

PMID: 39211629 PMC: 11350743. DOI: 10.1021/jacsau.3c00539.


References
1.
Spring B, Rizvi I, Xu N, Hasan T . The role of photodynamic therapy in overcoming cancer drug resistance. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2015; 14(8):1476-91. PMC: 4520758. DOI: 10.1039/c4pp00495g. View

2.
Celli J, Spring B, Rizvi I, Evans C, Samkoe K, Verma S . Imaging and photodynamic therapy: mechanisms, monitoring, and optimization. Chem Rev. 2010; 110(5):2795-838. PMC: 2896821. DOI: 10.1021/cr900300p. View

3.
Kessel D, Evans C . Promotion of Proapoptotic Signals by Lysosomal Photodamage: Mechanistic Aspects and Influence of Autophagy. Photochem Photobiol. 2016; 92(4):620-3. PMC: 4961560. DOI: 10.1111/php.12592. View

4.
Kessel D . Apoptosis and associated phenomena as a determinants of the efficacy of photodynamic therapy. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2015; 14(8):1397-402. PMC: 4492898. DOI: 10.1039/c4pp00413b. View

5.
Kessel D, Luo Y, Mathieu P, Reiners Jr J . Determinants of the apoptotic response to lysosomal photodamage. Photochem Photobiol. 2000; 71(2):196-200. DOI: 10.1562/0031-8655(2000)071<0196:dotart>2.0.co;2. View