» Articles » PMID: 30488299

Anatomical Study Based on 3D-CT Image Reconstruction of the Hip Rotation Center and Femoral Offset in a Chinese Population: Preoperative Implications in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Overview
Date 2018 Nov 30
PMID 30488299
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Several anatomical studies regarding the value of hip rotation center (HRC) and femoral offset (FO) have been performed in Western populations. However, there are a few data on hip morphological values in the Chinese population based on CT scans. This study measured the values of the hip and pelvis, especially HRC and FO, in a Chinese population and compared them with the published values obtained from Western populations.

Patients And Methods: One hundred patients (50 females and 50 males) were included in the present study, and 3D-CT reconstructions of the hip and pelvis were generated. The mean age was 51.4 ± 8.9 years and mean body mass index (BMI) was 23.5 ± 2.6 kg/m. All the morphologic measurements were compared between genders and sides, and the relationships between different parameters were analyzed.

Results: The mean FO values were 38.4 ± 4.7 mm and 35.6 ± 4.4 mm for the males and females, respectively. A significant negative correlation was noted between FO and neck shaft angle (NSA) in both genders (r = - 0.262, P = 0.009 for the males, r = - 0.350, P ≤ 0.001 for the females). A significant positive correlation was found between horizontal distance (HD) and diameter of the femoral head (DFH) in both genders (r = 0.734, P ≤ 0.001 for the males, r = 0.658, P ≤ 0.001 for the females). A significant positive correlation was noted between HD and pelvic width (PW) in males (r = 0.455, P ≤ 0.001). A significant positive correlation was also noted between HD and pelvic height (PH) in males (r = 0.318, P ≤ 0.001). A significant positive correlation was observed between FO and pelvic cavity height (PCH) in males (r = 0.411, P ≤ 0.001), and a significant positive correlation was observed between VD and PCH in females (r = 0.497, P ≤ 0.001). The tip of the greater trochanter was, on average, 7.0 mm higher than the femoral head center. Relationships between DFH and pelvic morphometric parameters were also observed.

Conclusion: The present morphological data and the relationships between them can be applied to design better ethnic-specific THA prostheses and preoperative plans.

Citing Articles

Reliably calibrating X-ray images required for preoperative planning of THA using a device-adapted magnification factor.

Bruggemann H, Paulsen A, Oppedal K, Grasmair M, Homberg D PLoS One. 2024; 19(8):e0307259.

PMID: 39172955 PMC: 11340982. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307259.


Hip implants can restore anatomical and medialized rotation centres in most cases : a 3D templating study comparing four implantation strategies.

Scheerlinck T, De Winter E, Sas A, Kolk S, Van Gompel G, Vandemeulebroucke J Bone Jt Open. 2021; 2(7):476-485.

PMID: 34236237 PMC: 8325978. DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.27.BJO-2021-0065.R1.


Optimizing the Femoral Offset for Restoring Physiological Hip Muscle Function in Patients With Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Hu X, Zheng N, Chen Y, Dai K, Dimitriou D, Li H Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021; 9:645019.

PMID: 33869155 PMC: 8045972. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.645019.


Patient-specific total hip arthroplasty is superior to conventional methods for Crowe III and IV adult developmental hip dysplasia: a randomized controlled trial.

Wang C, Li Y, Hu Y, Liu H, Wang L, Xie J Ann Transl Med. 2021; 9(3):212.

PMID: 33708839 PMC: 7940928. DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-3488.


Morphological consistency of bilateral hip joints in adults based on the X-ray and CT data.

Zhao R, Cai H, Tian H, Zhang K Surg Radiol Anat. 2021; 43(7):1107-1115.

PMID: 33486573 PMC: 8273057. DOI: 10.1007/s00276-020-02676-4.

References
1.
Devane P, Horne J . Assessment of polyethylene wear in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999; (369):59-72. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199912000-00007. View

2.
Sakalkale D, Sharkey P, Eng K, Hozack W, Rothman R . Effect of femoral component offset on polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001; (388):125-34. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200107000-00019. View

3.
Conn K, Clarke M, Hallett J . A simple guide to determine the magnification of radiographs and to improve the accuracy of preoperative templating. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002; 84(2):269-72. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.84b2.12599. View

4.
Asayama I, Chamnongkich S, Simpson K, Kinsey T, Mahoney O . Reconstructed hip joint position and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2005; 20(4):414-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2004.01.016. View

5.
Zhang Y, Liu P, Lu Y, Davies K, Dvornyk V, Recker R . Race and sex differences and contribution of height: a study on bone size in healthy Caucasians and Chinese. Am J Hum Biol. 2005; 17(5):568-75. DOI: 10.1002/ajhb.20427. View