» Articles » PMID: 30483209

Potential Mechanisms of Sensory Augmentation Systems on Human Balance Control

Overview
Journal Front Neurol
Specialty Neurology
Date 2018 Nov 29
PMID 30483209
Citations 38
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Numerous studies have demonstrated the real-time use of visual, vibrotactile, auditory, and multimodal sensory augmentation technologies for reducing postural sway during static tasks and improving balance during dynamic tasks. The mechanism by which sensory augmentation information is processed and used by the CNS is not well understood. The dominant hypothesis, which has not been supported by rigorous experimental evidence, posits that observed reductions in postural sway are due to sensory reweighting: feedback of body motion provides the CNS with a correlate to the inputs from its intact sensory channels (e.g., vision, proprioception), so individuals receiving sensory augmentation learn to increasingly depend on these intact systems. Other possible mechanisms for observed postural sway reductions include: cognition (processing of sensory augmentation information is solely cognitive with no selective adjustment of sensory weights by the CNS), "sixth" sense (CNS interprets sensory augmentation information as a new and distinct sensory channel), context-specific adaptation (new sensorimotor program is developed through repeated interaction with the device and accessible only when the device is used), and combined volitional and non-volitional responses. This critical review summarizes the reported sensory augmentation findings spanning postural control models, clinical rehabilitation, laboratory-based real-time usage, and neuroimaging to critically evaluate each of the aforementioned mechanistic theories. Cognition and sensory re-weighting are identified as two mechanisms supported by the existing literature.

Citing Articles

Knee proprioception, muscle strength, and stability in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus- A cross-sectional study.

Alahmari K, Reddy R Heliyon. 2024; 10(20):e39270.

PMID: 39498014 PMC: 11533566. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39270.


Does vibrotactile biofeedback for postural control interfere with cognitive processes?.

Schulleri K, Feizian F, Steinbock M, Lee D, Johannsen L J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024; 21(1):184.

PMID: 39425162 PMC: 11488272. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-024-01476-w.


Direct biomechanical manipulation of human gait stability: A systematic review.

Sterke B, Jabeen S, Baines P, Vallery H, Ribbers G, Heijenbrok-Kal M PLoS One. 2024; 19(7):e0305564.

PMID: 38990959 PMC: 11239080. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305564.


Wearable biofeedback device to assess gait features and improve gait pattern in people with parkinson's disease: a case series.

Bowman T, Pergolini A, Carrozza M, Lencioni T, Marzegan A, Meloni M J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024; 21(1):110.

PMID: 38926876 PMC: 11202340. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-024-01403-z.


Virtual Reality-Induced Modification of Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Gain in Posturography Tests.

Warchol J, Tetych A, Tomaszewski R, Kowalczyk B, Olchowik G J Clin Med. 2024; 13(10).

PMID: 38792284 PMC: 11122614. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13102742.


References
1.
Audu M, Lombardo L, Schnellenberger J, Foglyano K, Miller M, Triolo R . A neuroprosthesis for control of seated balance after spinal cord injury. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2015; 12:8. PMC: 4326199. DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-12-8. View

2.
Shull P, Lurie K, Cutkosky M, Besier T . Training multi-parameter gaits to reduce the knee adduction moment with data-driven models and haptic feedback. J Biomech. 2011; 44(8):1605-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.03.016. View

3.
Collins C, BACH-Y-RITA P . Transmission of pictorial information through the skin. Adv Biol Med Phys. 1973; 14:285-315. DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-005214-1.50010-8. View

4.
Wall 3rd C, Wrisley D, Statler K . Vibrotactile tilt feedback improves dynamic gait index: a fall risk indicator in older adults. Gait Posture. 2009; 30(1):16-21. PMC: 2752821. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.02.019. View

5.
Sathian K, Greenspan A, Wolf S . Doing it with mirrors: a case study of a novel approach to neurorehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2001; 14(1):73-6. DOI: 10.1177/154596830001400109. View