» Articles » PMID: 30482722

Organotypic Microfluidic Breast Cancer Model Reveals Starvation-induced Spatial-temporal Metabolic Adaptations

Overview
Journal EBioMedicine
Date 2018 Nov 29
PMID 30482722
Citations 48
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is the earliest stage of breast cancer. During DCIS, tumor cells remain inside the mammary duct, growing under a microenvironment characterized by hypoxia, nutrient starvation, and waste product accumulation; this harsh microenvironment promotes genomic instability and eventually cell invasion. However, there is a lack of biomarkers to predict what patients will transition to a more invasive tumor or how DCIS cells manage to survive in this harsh microenvironment.

Methods: In this work, we have developed a microfluidic model that recapitulates the DCIS microenvironment. In the microdevice, a DCIS model cell line was grown inside a luminal mammary duct model, embedded in a 3D hydrogel with mammary fibroblasts. Cell behavior was monitored by confocal microscopy and optical metabolic imaging. Additionally, metabolite profile was studied by NMR whereas gene expression was analyzed by RT-qPCR.

Findings: DCIS cell metabolism led to hypoxia and nutrient starvation; revealing an altered metabolism focused on glycolysis and other hypoxia-associated pathways. In response to this starvation and hypoxia, DCIS cells modified the expression of multiple genes, and a gradient of different metabolic phenotypes was observed across the mammary duct model. These genetic changes observed in the model were in good agreement with patient genomic profiles; identifying multiple compounds targeting the affected pathways. In this context, the hypoxia-activated prodrug tirapazamine selectively destroyed hypoxic DCIS cells.

Interpretation: The results showed the capacity of the microfluidic model to mimic the DCIS structure, identifying multiple cellular adaptations to endure the hypoxia and nutrient starvation generated within the mammary duct. These findings may suggest new potential therapeutic directions to treat DCIS. In summary, given the lack of in vitro models to study DCIS, this microfluidic device holds great potential to find new DCIS predictors and therapies and translate them to the clinic.

Citing Articles

Quantifying and interpreting biologically meaningful spatial signatures within tumor microenvironments.

Jing S, Wang H, Lin P, Yuan J, Tang Z, Li H NPJ Precis Oncol. 2025; 9(1):68.

PMID: 40069556 PMC: 11897387. DOI: 10.1038/s41698-025-00857-1.


Three-Dimensional Models: Biomimetic Tools That Recapitulate Breast Tissue Architecture and Microenvironment to Study Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Transition to Invasive Ductal Breast Cancer.

Shah S, Osuala K, Brock E, Ji K, Sloane B, Mattingly R Cells. 2025; 14(3).

PMID: 39937011 PMC: 11817749. DOI: 10.3390/cells14030220.


Deciphering fibroblast-induced drug resistance in non-small cell lung carcinoma through patient-derived organoids in agarose microwells.

Luan Q, Pulido I, Isagirre A, Carretero J, Zhou J, Shimamura T Lab Chip. 2024; 24(7):2025-2038.

PMID: 38410967 PMC: 11209828. DOI: 10.1039/d3lc01044a.


An model of cancer invasion with heterogeneous ECM created with droplet microfluidics.

Jouybar M, Sleeboom J, Vaezzadeh E, Sahlgren C, den Toonder J Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023; 11:1267021.

PMID: 38076430 PMC: 10702358. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1267021.


Endothelial cells metabolically regulate breast cancer invasion toward a microvessel.

Tan M, Jenkins-Johnston N, Huang S, Schutrum B, Vadhin S, Adhikari A APL Bioeng. 2023; 7(4):046116.

PMID: 38058993 PMC: 10697723. DOI: 10.1063/5.0171109.


References
1.
Xia J, Psychogios N, Young N, Wishart D . MetaboAnalyst: a web server for metabolomic data analysis and interpretation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009; 37(Web Server issue):W652-60. PMC: 2703878. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkp356. View

2.
Zhao F . Biology of glucose transport in the mammary gland. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2013; 19(1):3-17. DOI: 10.1007/s10911-013-9310-8. View

3.
Pereira B, Chin S, Rueda O, Vollan H, Provenzano E, Bardwell H . The somatic mutation profiles of 2,433 breast cancers refines their genomic and transcriptomic landscapes. Nat Commun. 2016; 7:11479. PMC: 4866047. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms11479. View

4.
Shah A, Diggins K, Walsh A, Irish J, Skala M . In Vivo Autofluorescence Imaging of Tumor Heterogeneity in Response to Treatment. Neoplasia. 2015; 17(12):862-870. PMC: 4688562. DOI: 10.1016/j.neo.2015.11.006. View

5.
Polyak K . Breast cancer: origins and evolution. J Clin Invest. 2007; 117(11):3155-63. PMC: 2045618. DOI: 10.1172/JCI33295. View