» Articles » PMID: 30482037

Toxicity and Survival of Anal Cancer Patients Treated with Intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy

Overview
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2018 Nov 29
PMID 30482037
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: The definitive treatment of anal cancer with chemoradiotherapy spares abdominoperineal resection for salvage treatment but carries a high burden of toxicity. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy has been implemented to reduce toxicity, reduce treatment breaks and improve survival. However, large and long-term studies are lacking. We aimed to investigate the toxicities and long-term survival of anal cancer patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy at James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough.

Materials And Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of all patients with squamous cell anal cancer treated at James Cook University Hospital between July 2010 and April 2017. All patients were uniformly treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy-based chemoradiation with curative intent. A subset of these patients was followed-up prospectively by an oncologist for acute and late toxicity. We calculated Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival statistics and compared our results with those of previous trials which used conventional radiotherapy.

Results: We studied 132 patients, including a toxicity subset of 64, for a median follow-up time of 43 months (range 3-84 months). Eleven patients (8.3%) underwent salvage abdominoperineal resection. Grade 3+ acute non-haematological, gastrointestinal, genitourinary and dermatological toxicity were found in 56.2%, 12.3%, 0% and 50.7% of the toxicity subset (n = 64). Median treatment duration was 37 days. Overall and colostomy-free survival at five years were 68.3% and 85.3%, respectively. Tumour size (P = 0.006) and age (P = 0.002) predicted shorter overall survival.

Conclusions: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy probably reduces acute gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity compared with conventional radiotherapy, while resulting in similar overall and colostomy-free survival. We suggest that further dose escalation may improve survival in patients with T3/T4 tumours.

Citing Articles

Spray skin protectant versus standard moisturiser in the prevention of radiodermatitis in patients with anal canal and rectal cancer: A randomised clinical trial.

Simoes F, da Silva E Silva T, Pires A, Franca C, Velasco N, Santos V Int Wound J. 2024; 21(8):e70030.

PMID: 39171868 PMC: 11339855. DOI: 10.1111/iwj.70030.


The Treatment Combining Antiangiogenesis with Chemoradiotherapy Impinges on the Peripheral Circulation Vascular Endothelial Cells and Therapeutic Effect in the Patients with Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

Gong X, Wang L, Wu W, Li Y, Long J, Chen X Biomed Res Int. 2022; 2022:1787854.

PMID: 35872851 PMC: 9307343. DOI: 10.1155/2022/1787854.


Vaginal Sparing Radiotherapy Using IMPT and Daily Dilator Placement for Women with Anal Cancer.

Lester S, McGrath L, Guenzel R, Quinn J, Schultz C, Bradley T Int J Part Ther. 2022; 9(1):83-89.

PMID: 35774492 PMC: 9238131. DOI: 10.14338/IJPT-21-00025.


Radiodermatitis: severity, predictive factors and discontinuation of radiotherapy in patients with anal and rectal cancer.

Bastos L, Lanzillotti R, Brandao M, da Silva R, Simoes F Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2022; 56:e20210378.

PMID: 35723900 PMC: 10081625. DOI: 10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2021-0378en.


Treatment results for patients with squamous-cell carcinoma of the anus, a single institution retrospective analysis.

Neelis K, Kip D, Speetjens F, van der Linden Y Radiat Oncol. 2022; 17(1):81.

PMID: 35443730 PMC: 9022342. DOI: 10.1186/s13014-022-02049-8.


References
1.
Graf R, Wust P, Hildebrandt B, GOGLER H, Ullrich R, Herrmann R . Impact of overall treatment time on local control of anal cancer treated with radiochemotherapy. Oncology. 2003; 65(1):14-22. DOI: 10.1159/000071200. View

2.
Kim J, Tannock I . Repopulation of cancer cells during therapy: an important cause of treatment failure. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005; 5(7):516-25. DOI: 10.1038/nrc1650. View

3.
Chen Y, Liu A, Tsai P, Vora N, Pezner R, Schultheiss T . Organ sparing by conformal avoidance intensity-modulated radiation therapy for anal cancer: dosimetric evaluation of coverage of pelvis and inguinal/femoral nodes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005; 63(1):274-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.05.052. View

4.
Milano M, Jani A, Farrey K, Rash C, Heimann R, Chmura S . Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in the treatment of anal cancer: toxicity and clinical outcome. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005; 63(2):354-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.02.030. View

5.
Salama J, Mell L, Schomas D, Miller R, Devisetty K, Jani A . Concurrent chemotherapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for anal canal cancer patients: a multicenter experience. J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25(29):4581-6. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.0170. View