Endoscopic Dilation of Pharyngoesophageal Strictures: There Are More Dimensions Than a Diameter

Overview

Journal GE Port J Gastroenterol

Specialty Gastroenterology

Date 2018 Nov 28

PMID 30480046

Citations 1

Authors

Diana Martins

Sara Pires

Pedro Pimentel-Nunes

Rui Almeida Silva

Claudia Camila Dias

Mario Dinis-Ribeiro

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background/aims: Dysphagia due to benign pharyngoesophageal strictures (PES) often requires repeated dilations; however, a uniform definition for the therapeutic efficacy of this technique has not been yet established. We aimed to assess the overall efficacy of endoscopic dilation of pharyngoesophageal anastomotic or post-radiotherapy (post-RT) strictures.

Methods: The data of 48 patients with post-RT ( = 29) or anastomotic PES ( = 19) submitted to endoscopic dilation during a 3-year period were retrospectively assessed. The Kochman criteria were used to determine refractoriness and recurrence. Patients were asked to answer a questionnaire determining prospectively the dilation program efficacy as (a) dysphagia improvement, (b) dysphagia resolution, (c) need for further dilations, or (d) percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) during the previous 6 months. Need for additional therapy was considered an inefficacy criterion.

Results: The median number of dilations per patient was 4 (total of 296 dilations) with a median follow-up of 29 months. The mean predilation dysphagia Mellow-Pinkas score was 3 and the initial stenosis diameter was 7 mm. Fifteen and 29% of patients presented with the Kochman criteria for refractory and recurrent strictures, respectively. Moreover, 96 and 60% showed dysphagia improvement and resolution, respectively. Seventy-five-percent did not require dilations during 6 months, and 89% did not require PEG. From the patients' perspective, overall efficacy was achieved in 58% of cases. Nine additional therapies were required. Number of dilations (OR 0.7), stricture diameter (OR 2.2), and nonrecurrence criteria (OR 14.2) appeared as significant predictors of overall efficacy, whereas refractory stenosis criteria did not.

Conclusions: Endoscopic dilation seems to be effective for patients with dysphagia after RT or surgery, especially when assessed as patient perception of improvement. Narrow strictures, recurrent ones, and strictures requiring a higher number of dilations may predict worse outcomes.

Key Message: Health professionals should establish well-defined efficacy criteria for dilations and base their decision beyond exclusively objective measurements.

Citing Articles

Benign Pharyngoesophageal Strictures: Increasingly Encountered and Still a Challenge.

Costa D, Rolanda C GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2018; 25(6):282-284.

PMID: 30480044 PMC: 6244104. DOI: 10.1159/000492070.

References

Williams V, Watson T, Zhovtis S, Gellersen O, Raymond D, Jones C . Endoscopic and symptomatic assessment of anastomotic strictures following esophagectomy and cervical esophagogastrostomy. Surg Endosc. 2007; 22(6):1470-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-007-9653-6. View

Lew R, Shah J, Chalian A, Weber R, Williams N, Kochman M . Technique of endoscopic retrograde puncture and dilatation of total esophageal stenosis in patients with radiation-induced strictures. Head Neck. 2004; 26(2):179-83. DOI: 10.1002/hed.10365. View

Mellow M, Pinkas H . Endoscopic laser therapy for malignancies affecting the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction. Analysis of technical and functional efficacy. Arch Intern Med. 1985; 145(8):1443-6. View

COX J, Winter R, Maslin S, Jones R, Buckton G, Hoare R . Balloon or bougie for dilatation of benign oesophageal stricture? An interim report of a randomised controlled trial. Gut. 1988; 29(12):1741-7. PMC: 1434110. DOI: 10.1136/gut.29.12.1741. View

Park J, Kim K, Song H, Cho Y, Kim P, Tsauo J . Radiation-induced esophageal strictures treated with fluoroscopic balloon dilation: clinical outcomes and factors influencing recurrence in 62 patients. Acta Radiol. 2017; 59(3):313-321. DOI: 10.1177/0284185117713351. View

Siersema P . Stenting for benign esophageal strictures. Endoscopy. 2009; 41(4):363-73. DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1214532. View

van Hooft J, van Berge Henegouwen M, Rauws E, Bergman J, Busch O, Fockens P . Endoscopic treatment of benign anastomotic esophagogastric strictures with a biodegradable stent. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011; 73(5):1043-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.01.001. View

Goguen L, Norris C, Jaklitsch M, Sullivan C, Posner M, Haddad R . Combined antegrade and retrograde esophageal dilation for head and neck cancer-related complete esophageal stenosis. Laryngoscope. 2009; 120(2):261-6. DOI: 10.1002/lary.20727. View

Hordijk M, van Hooft J, Hansen B, Fockens P, Kuipers E . A randomized comparison of electrocautery incision with Savary bougienage for relief of anastomotic gastroesophageal strictures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009; 70(5):849-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.02.023. View

10.

Peng K, Feinstein A, Salinas J, Chhetri D . Utility of the transnasal esophagoscope in the management of chemoradiation-induced esophageal stenosis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2014; 124(3):221-6. DOI: 10.1177/0003489414550858. View

11.

Dzeletovic I, Fleischer D, Crowell M, Pannala R, Harris L, Ramirez F . Self-dilation as a treatment for resistant, benign esophageal strictures. Dig Dis Sci. 2013; 58(11):3218-23. DOI: 10.1007/s10620-013-2822-7. View

12.

Repici A, Vleggaar F, Hassan C, van Boeckel P, Romeo F, Pagano N . Efficacy and safety of biodegradable stents for refractory benign esophageal strictures: the BEST (Biodegradable Esophageal Stent) study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010; 72(5):927-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.07.031. View

13.

Ahlawat S, Al-Kawas F . Endoscopic management of upper esophageal strictures after treatment of head and neck malignancy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 68(1):19-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.11.027. View

14.

Yoda Y, Yano T, Kaneko K, Tsuruta S, Oono Y, Kojima T . Endoscopic balloon dilatation for benign fibrotic strictures after curative nonsurgical treatment for esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2012; 26(10):2877-83. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2273-9. View

15.

Rodrigues-Pinto E, Pereira P, Ribeiro A, Lopes S, Moutinho-Ribeiro P, Silva M . Risk factors associated with refractoriness to esophageal dilatation for benign dysphagia. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016; 28(6):684-8. DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000594. View

16.

Grobe J, Kozarek R, Sanowski R . Self-bougienage in the treatment of benign esophageal stricture. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1984; 6(2):109-12. DOI: 10.1097/00004836-198404000-00002. View

17.

Agarwalla A, Small A, Mendelson A, Scott F, Kochman M . Risk of recurrent or refractory strictures and outcome of endoscopic dilation for radiation-induced esophageal strictures. Surg Endosc. 2014; 29(7):1903-12. PMC: 4385000. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3883-1. View

18.

Moss W, Pang J, Orosco R, Weissbrod P, Brumund K, Weisman R . Esophageal dilation in head and neck cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Laryngoscope. 2017; 128(1):111-117. DOI: 10.1002/lary.26618. View

19.

van Boeckel P, Siersema P . Refractory esophageal strictures: what to do when dilation fails. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2015; 13(1):47-58. PMC: 4328110. DOI: 10.1007/s11938-014-0043-6. View

20.

Scolapio J, Pasha T, Gostout C, Mahoney D, Zinsmeister A, Ott B . A randomized prospective study comparing rigid to balloon dilators for benign esophageal strictures and rings. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999; 50(1):13-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(99)70337-8. View