» Articles » PMID: 30467025

MutSγ-Induced DNA Conformational Changes Provide Insights into Its Role in Meiotic Recombination

Overview
Journal Biophys J
Publisher Cell Press
Specialty Biophysics
Date 2018 Nov 24
PMID 30467025
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In many organisms, MutSγ plays a role in meiotic recombination, facilitating crossover formation between homologous chromosomes. Failure to form crossovers leads to improper segregation of chromosomes and aneuploidy, which in humans result in infertility and birth defects. To improve current understanding of MutSγ function, this study investigates the binding affinities and structures of MutSγ in complex with DNA substrates that model homologous recombination intermediates. For these studies, we overexpressed and isolated from Escherichia coli the yeast MutSγ protein Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Sc) Msh4-Msh5. Sc Msh4-Msh5 binds Holliday junction (HJ)-like substrates, 3' overhangs, single-stranded (ss) forks, and the displacement loop with nanomolar affinity. The weakest binding affinities are detected for an intact duplex and open-junction construct. Similar to the human protein, Sc Msh4-Msh5 exhibits the highest affinity for the HJ with a K < 0.4 nM in solution. Energy-transfer experiments further demonstrate that DNA structure is modulated by the binding interaction with the largest changes associated with substrates containing an ss end. Upon binding, Sc Msh4-Msh5 displaces the ss away from the duplex in most of the ss-containing intermediates, potentially enabling the binding of RPA and other proteins. In the case of the junction-like intermediates, Msh4-Msh5 binding either stabilizes the existing stacked structure or induces formation of the stacked X conformation. Significantly, we find that upon binding, Msh4-Msh5 stacks an open-junction construct to the same extent as the standard junction. Stabilization of the junction in the stacked conformation is generally refractory to branch migration, which is consistent with a potential role for MutSγ to stabilize HJs and prevent branch migration until resolution by MutLγ. The different binding modalities observed suggest that Msh4-Msh5 not only binds to and stabilizes stacked junctions but also participates in meiotic recombination before junction formation through the stabilization of single-end invasion intermediates.

Citing Articles

Proximity labeling reveals new functional relationships between meiotic recombination proteins in S. cerevisiae.

Voelkel-Meiman K, Liddle J, Balsbaugh J, MacQueen A PLoS Genet. 2024; 20(10):e1011432.

PMID: 39405359 PMC: 11508090. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1011432.


Site-specific investigation of DNA Holliday Junction dynamics and structure with 6-Methylisoxanthopterin, a fluorescent guanine analog.

Lombardo Z, Mukerji I Trends Photochem Photobiol. 2024; 22:85-102.

PMID: 39371247 PMC: 11450702.


Site-Specific Investigation of DNA Holliday Junction Dynamics and Structure with 6-Methylisoxanthopterin, a Fluorescent Guanine Analog.

Lombardo Z, Mukerji I bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38659790 PMC: 11042373. DOI: 10.1101/2024.04.19.590264.


The DNA helicase FANCJ (BRIP1) functions in double strand break repair processing, but not crossover formation during prophase I of meiosis in male mice.

Horan T, Ascencao C, Mellor C, Wang M, Smolka M, Cohen P PLoS Genet. 2024; 20(2):e1011175.

PMID: 38377115 PMC: 10906868. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1011175.


The molecular machinery of meiotic recombination.

Chen L, Weir J Biochem Soc Trans. 2024; 52(1):379-393.

PMID: 38348856 PMC: 10903461. DOI: 10.1042/BST20230712.


References
1.
Lynn A, Soucek R, Borner G . ZMM proteins during meiosis: crossover artists at work. Chromosome Res. 2007; 15(5):591-605. DOI: 10.1007/s10577-007-1150-1. View

2.
Nishant K, Chen C, Shinohara M, Shinohara A, Alani E . Genetic analysis of baker's yeast Msh4-Msh5 reveals a threshold crossover level for meiotic viability. PLoS Genet. 2010; 6(8). PMC: 2928781. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001083. View

3.
Ross-Macdonald P, Roeder G . Mutation of a meiosis-specific MutS homolog decreases crossing over but not mismatch correction. Cell. 1994; 79(6):1069-80. DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90037-x. View

4.
Wojtuszewski K, Hawkins M, Cole J, Mukerji I . HU binding to DNA: evidence for multiple complex formation and DNA bending. Biochemistry. 2001; 40(8):2588-98. DOI: 10.1021/bi002382r. View

5.
Franklin F, Higgins J, Sanchez-Moran E, Armstrong S, Osman K, Jackson N . Control of meiotic recombination in Arabidopsis: role of the MutL and MutS homologues. Biochem Soc Trans. 2006; 34(Pt 4):542-4. DOI: 10.1042/BST0340542. View