» Articles » PMID: 30464417

Eliciting Vulnerable Patients' Preferences Regarding Colorectal Cancer Screening: a Systematic Review

Overview
Date 2018 Nov 23
PMID 30464417
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Patient preferences are important to consider in the decision-making process for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Vulnerable populations, such as racial/ethnic minorities and low-income, veteran, and rural populations, exhibit lower screening uptake. This systematic review summarizes the existing literature on vulnerable patient populations' preferences regarding CRC screening.

Methods: We searched the CINAHL, PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for articles published between January 1, 1996 and December 31, 2017. We screened studies for eligibility and systematically abstracted and compared study designs and outcomes.

Results: A total of 43 articles met the inclusion criteria, out of 2,106 articles found in our search. These 43 articles were organized by the primary sub-population(s) whose preferences were reported: 27 report on preferences among racial/ethnic minorities, eight among low-income groups, six among veterans, and two among rural populations. The majority of studies (n=34) focused on preferences related to test modality. No single test modality was overwhelmingly supported by all sub-populations, although veterans seemed to prefer colonoscopy. Test attributes such as accuracy, sensitivity, cost, and convenience were also noted as important features. Furthermore, a preference for shared decision-making between vulnerable patients and providers was found.

Conclusion: The heterogeneity in study design, populations, and outcomes of the selected studies revealed a wide spectrum of CRC screening preferences within vulnerable populations. More decision aids and discrete choice experiments that focus on vulnerable populations are needed to gain a more nuanced understanding of how vulnerable populations weigh particular features of screening methods. Improved CRC screening rates may be achieved through the alignment of vulnerable populations' preferences with screening program design and provider practices. Collaborative decision-making between providers and vulnerable patients in preventive care decisions may also be important.

Citing Articles

Assessing the job preferences of senior medical students for mandatory service: a discrete choice experiment.

Tozduman B, Sozmen M Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2024; 25:e31.

PMID: 38818776 PMC: 11362681. DOI: 10.1017/S1463423624000252.


Is there a place for sigmoidoscopy in colorectal cancer screening? A systematic review and critical appraisal of cost-effectiveness models.

Diedrich L, Brinkmann M, Dreier M, Rossol S, Schramm W, Krauth C PLoS One. 2023; 18(8):e0290353.

PMID: 37594967 PMC: 10438011. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290353.


Methods to Summarize Discrete-Choice Experiments in a Systematic Review: A Scoping Review.

Choudhary D, Thomas M, Pacheco-Barrios K, Zhang Y, Alonso-Coello P, Schunemann H Patient. 2022; 15(6):629-639.

PMID: 35829927 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-022-00587-7.


Disparities in Recommendations for Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Average-Risk Individuals: An Ecobiosocial Approach.

Syed Soffian S, Mohammed Nawi A, Hod R, Abdul Manaf M, Chan H, Hassan M Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2022; 15:1025-1043.

PMID: 35599752 PMC: 9115807. DOI: 10.2147/RMHP.S359450.


Additional offer of sigmoidoscopy in colorectal cancer screening in Germany: rationale and protocol of the decision-analytic modelling approach in the SIGMO study.

Diedrich L, Brinkmann M, Dreier M, Schramm W, Krauth C BMJ Open. 2022; 12(1):e050698.

PMID: 34992106 PMC: 8739067. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050698.


References
1.
Wong M, Tsoi K, Ng S, Lou V, Choi S, Ling K . A comparison of the acceptance of immunochemical faecal occult blood test and colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening: a prospective study among Chinese. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010; 32(1):74-82. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2010.04312.x. View

2.
Molokwu J, Penaranda E, Shokar N . Decision-Making Preferences Among Older Hispanics Participating in a Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening Program. J Community Health. 2017; 42(5):1027-1034. DOI: 10.1007/s10900-017-0352-5. View

3.
Hawley S, Volk R, Krishnamurthy P, Jibaja-Weiss M, Vernon S, Kneuper S . Preferences for colorectal cancer screening among racially/ethnically diverse primary care patients. Med Care. 2008; 46(9 Suppl 1):S10-6. DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31817d932e. View

4.
. Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2008; 149(9):627-37. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-9-200811040-00243. View

5.
Ghanouni A, Smith S, Halligan S, Plumb A, Boone D, Yao G . Public preferences for colorectal cancer screening tests: a review of conjoint analysis studies. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2013; 10(4):489-99. DOI: 10.1586/17434440.2013.811867. View