» Articles » PMID: 20309740

What is Most Important to Patients when Deciding About Colorectal Screening?

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2010 Mar 24
PMID 20309740
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening can be administered through tests with varied characteristics and is a preference-sensitive decision.

Objective: To assess patient experiences with a Maximum Differences Scaling (MDS) tool for eliciting values about CRC screening test characteristics and determine whether patients vary in how they prioritize test characteristics and whether this variation relates to test preferences.

Design: MDS survey to elicit patients' values for characteristics related to fecal occult blood testing, sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy, CT colonography and colon capsule endoscopy.

Participants: 92 patients enrolled in primary care clinics at a VA hospital and associated university.

Results: Patients reported that the tool was easy to use (95%). On completion 62% would choose colonoscopy, 23% colon capsule endoscopy and 10% CT colonography. Of the attributes evaluated, patients valued sensitivity, risk of tear and need for a second test most. Sensitivity was more important to those choosing colonoscopy than those choosing other tests (median importance = 21.5 versus 19.6, p < 0.01). Concern with complications and sedation was positively associated with age (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001), whereas concern with colon preparation and missing work was negatively associated with age (p < 0.009 and p < 0.03). Patients with fair or poor health status were less concerned with sensitivity than patients in good to excellent health (median importance = 19.3 versus 21.4, p < 0.008).

Conclusions: This pilot study suggests that patients vary in how they prioritize colorectal cancer screening test attributes; this variation is associated with test preferences, and this MDS tool is feasible to use and may help patients construct their preferences.

Citing Articles

Eliciting vulnerable patients' preferences regarding colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review.

Lee S, OLeary M, Umble K, Wheeler S Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018; 12:2267-2282.

PMID: 30464417 PMC: 6216965. DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S156552.


Individualized Colorectal Cancer Screening Discussions Between Older Adults and Their Primary Care Providers: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Kistler C, Golin C, Sundaram A, Morris C, Dalton A, Ferrari R MDM Policy Pract. 2018; 3(1):2381468318765172.

PMID: 30288441 PMC: 6157429. DOI: 10.1177/2381468318765172.


Individual Value Clarification Methods Based on Conjoint Analysis: A Systematic Review of Common Practice in Task Design, Statistical Analysis, and Presentation of Results.

Weernink M, van Til J, Witteman H, Fraenkel L, IJzerman M Med Decis Making. 2018; 38(6):746-755.

PMID: 29592585 PMC: 6587358. DOI: 10.1177/0272989X18765185.


Colorectal Cancer Screening Preferences among Black and Latino Primary Care Patients.

Chablani S, Cohen N, White D, Itzkowitz S, DuHamel K, Jandorf L J Immigr Minor Health. 2016; 19(5):1100-1108.

PMID: 27351895 PMC: 5698179. DOI: 10.1007/s10903-016-0453-8.


Experimental measurement of preferences in health and healthcare using best-worst scaling: an overview.

Muhlbacher A, Kaczynski A, Zweifel P, Reed Johnson F Health Econ Rev. 2016; 6(1):2.

PMID: 26743636 PMC: 4705077. DOI: 10.1186/s13561-015-0079-x.


References
1.
Kim J, Whitney A, Hayter S, Lewis C, Campbell M, Sutherland L . Development and initial testing of a computer-based patient decision aid to promote colorectal cancer screening for primary care practice. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2005; 5:36. PMC: 1318488. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-5-36. View

2.
Kronborg O, Fenger C, Olsen J, Jorgensen O, Sondergaard O . Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test. Lancet. 1996; 348(9040):1467-71. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)03430-7. View

3.
Van Dam L, Hol L, de Bekker-Grob E, Steyerberg E, Kuipers E, Habbema J . What determines individuals' preferences for colorectal cancer screening programmes? A discrete choice experiment. Eur J Cancer. 2009; 46(1):150-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.07.014. View

4.
Griffith J, Lewis C, Brenner A, Pignone M . The effect of offering different numbers of colorectal cancer screening test options in a decision aid: a pilot randomized trial. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008; 8:4. PMC: 2259331. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-8-4. View

5.
Leard L, Savides T, Ganiats T . Patient preferences for colorectal cancer screening. J Fam Pract. 1997; 45(3):211-8. View