» Articles » PMID: 30457474

Generation of Transgene-free Porcine Intermediate Type Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells

Overview
Journal Cell Cycle
Specialty Cell Biology
Date 2018 Nov 21
PMID 30457474
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Physiologically and anatomically, humans and pigs share many similarities, which make porcine induced pluripotent stem cells (piPSCs) very attractive for modeling human cell therapy as well as for testing safety of iPSC based cell replacement therapies. To date, several integrative and non-integrative strategies have been reported to successfully generate piPSCs, but all resulting piPSCs had integration of transgenes. The use of integrative methods has the disadvantage of potential lack of silencing or inappropriate re-activation of these genes during differentiation, as well as uncertainty regarding disruption of important genomic regions caused by integration. In our study, we performed a non-integrative vector based reprogramming approach using porcine fetal fibroblasts. The resulting four piPSC lines were positive for pluripotency marker and when subjected to in vitro and in vivo differentiation assays, all four lines formed embryoid bodies, capable to differentiate into all three germ layers, and three out of the four cell lines formed teratomas. PCR analysis on genomic and plasmid DNA revealed that the episomal vectors were undetectable in six out of eight subclones derived from one of the piPSC lines (piPSC1) above passage 20. These piPSCs could potentially be ideal cell lines for the generation of porcine in vitro and in vivo models. Furthermore, subsequent analyses of our new transgene independent piPSCs could provide novel insights on the genetic and epigenetic necessities to achieve and maintain piPSCs.

Citing Articles

Can cell-cultured meat from stem cells pave the way for sustainable alternative protein?.

Nunes O, Buranello T, Farias F, Rosero J, Recchia K, Bressan F Curr Res Food Sci. 2025; 10:100979.

PMID: 40040753 PMC: 11878651. DOI: 10.1016/j.crfs.2025.100979.


The progress of induced pluripotent stem cells derived from pigs: a mini review of recent advances.

Neira J, Conrad J, Rusteika M, Chu L Front Cell Dev Biol. 2024; 12:1371240.

PMID: 38979033 PMC: 11228285. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2024.1371240.


Efficient derivation of transgene-free porcine induced pluripotent stem cells enables in vitro modeling of species-specific developmental timing.

Conrad J, Meyer S, Ramesh P, Neira J, Rusteika M, Mamott D Stem Cell Reports. 2023; 18(12):2328-2343.

PMID: 37949072 PMC: 10724057. DOI: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2023.10.009.


Stem cell-based strategies and challenges for production of cultivated meat.

Jara T, Park K, Vahmani P, Van Eenennaam A, Smith L, Denicol A Nat Food. 2023; 4(10):841-853.

PMID: 37845547 DOI: 10.1038/s43016-023-00857-z.


Species origin of exogenous transcription factors affects the activation of endogenous pluripotency markers and signaling pathways of porcine induced pluripotent stem cells.

Zhou M, Zhang M, Guo T, Zhao L, Guo X, Yin Z Front Cell Dev Biol. 2023; 11:1196273.

PMID: 37152293 PMC: 10160484. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2023.1196273.


References
1.
Esteban M, Xu J, Yang J, Peng M, Qin D, Li W . Generation of induced pluripotent stem cell lines from Tibetan miniature pig. J Biol Chem. 2009; 284(26):17634-40. PMC: 2719402. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M109.008938. View

2.
Sartori C, DiDomenico A, Thomson A, Milne E, Lillico S, Burdon T . Ovine-induced pluripotent stem cells can contribute to chimeric lambs. Cell Reprogram. 2012; 14(1):8-19. DOI: 10.1089/cell.2011.0050. View

3.
Zhou W, Freed C . Adenoviral gene delivery can reprogram human fibroblasts to induced pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cells. 2009; 27(11):2667-74. DOI: 10.1002/stem.201. View

4.
Okita K, Matsumura Y, Sato Y, Okada A, Morizane A, Okamoto S . A more efficient method to generate integration-free human iPS cells. Nat Methods. 2011; 8(5):409-12. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.1591. View

5.
Okita K, Yamanaka S . Induction of pluripotency by defined factors. Exp Cell Res. 2010; 316(16):2565-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2010.04.023. View