» Articles » PMID: 30456467

Fluid Administration for Acute Circulatory Dysfunction Using Basic Monitoring: Narrative Review and Expert Panel Recommendations from an ESICM Task Force

Abstract

An international team of experts in the field of fluid resuscitation was invited by the ESICM to form a task force to systematically review the evidence concerning fluid administration using basic monitoring. The work included a particular emphasis on pre-ICU hospital settings and resource-limited settings. The work focused on four main questions: (1) What is the role of clinical assessment to guide fluid resuscitation in shock? (2) What basic monitoring is required to perform and interpret a fluid challenge? (3) What defines a fluid challenge in terms of fluid type, ranges of volume, and rate of administration? (4) What are the safety endpoints during a fluid challenge? The expert panel found insufficient evidence to provide recommendations according to the GRADE system, and was only able to make recommendations for basic interventions, based on the available evidence and expert opinion. The panel identified significant gaps in the scientific evidence on fluid administration outside the ICU (excluding the operating theater). Globally, scientific communities and health care systems should address these critical gaps in evidence through research on how basic fluid administration in resource-rich and resource-limited settings can be improved for the benefit of patients and societies worldwide.

Citing Articles

Carbon Monoxide Poisoning: Diagnosis, Prognostic Factors, Treatment Strategies, and Future Perspectives.

Afzal M, Agarwal S, Elshaikh R, Babker A, Choudhary R, Prabhakar P Diagnostics (Basel). 2025; 15(5).

PMID: 40075828 PMC: 11899572. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics15050581.


Changes in pulse pressure variation induced by passive leg raising test to predict preload responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with low tidal volume in ICU: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Mallat J, Siuba M, Abou-Arab O, Kovacevic P, Ismail K, Duggal A Crit Care. 2025; 29(1):18.

PMID: 39789598 PMC: 11720620. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-024-05238-x.


Management of adult sepsis in resource-limited settings: global expert consensus statements using a Delphi method.

Thwaites L, Nasa P, Abbenbroek B, Dat V, Finfer S, Kwizera A Intensive Care Med. 2024; 51(1):21-38.

PMID: 39714613 PMC: 11787051. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-024-07735-7.


Contemporary Review of Hemodynamic Monitoring in the Critical Care Setting.

Rali A, Butcher A, Tedford R, Sinha S, Mekki P, Van Spall H US Cardiol. 2024; 16:e12.

PMID: 39600839 PMC: 11588176. DOI: 10.15420/usc.2021.34.


Heart-Lungs interactions: the basics and clinical implications.

Jozwiak M, Teboul J Ann Intensive Care. 2024; 14(1):122.

PMID: 39133379 PMC: 11319696. DOI: 10.1186/s13613-024-01356-5.


References
1.
ALLGOWER M, Burri C . ["Shock index"]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1967; 92(43):1947-50. DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1106070. View

2.
van Genderen M, Engels N, van der Valk R, Lima A, Klijn E, Bakker J . Early peripheral perfusion-guided fluid therapy in patients with septic shock. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015; 191(4):477-80. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201408-1575LE. View

3.
Vincent J, Einav S, Pearse R, Jaber S, Kranke P, Overdyk F . Improving detection of patient deterioration in the general hospital ward environment. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2018; 35(5):325-333. PMC: 5902137. DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000798. View

4.
Semler M, Self W, Rice T . Balanced Crystalloids versus Saline in Critically Ill Adults. N Engl J Med. 2018; 378(20):1951. PMC: 6570410. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc1804294. View

5.
Perner A, Cecconi M, Cronhjort M, Darmon M, Jakob S, Pettila V . Expert statement for the management of hypovolemia in sepsis. Intensive Care Med. 2018; 44(6):791-798. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-018-5177-x. View