» Articles » PMID: 30453908

Perinatal Outcomes in Twin Pregnancies Complicated by Maternal Morbidity: Evidence from the WHO Multicountry Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health

Abstract

Background: Twin pregnancy was associated with significantly higher rates of adverse neonatal and perinatal outcomes, especially for the second twin. In addition, the maternal complications (potentially life-threatening conditions-PLTC, maternal near miss-MNM, and maternal mortality-MM) are directly related to twin pregnancy and independently associated with adverse perinatal outcome. The objective of the preset study is to evaluate perinatal outcomes associated with twin pregnancies, stratified by severe maternal morbidity and order of birth.

Methods: Secondary analysis of the WHO Multicountry Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health (WHOMCS), a cross-sectional study implemented in 29 countries. Data from 8568 twin deliveries were compared with 308,127 singleton deliveries. The occurrence of adverse perinatal outcomes and maternal complications were assessed. Factors independently associated with adverse perinatal outcomes were reported with adjusted PR (Prevalence Ratio) and 95%CI.

Results: The occurrence of severe maternal morbidity and maternal death was significantly higher among twin compared to singleton pregnancies in all regions. Twin deliveries were associated with higher rates of preterm delivery (37.1%), Apgar scores less than 7 at 5th minute (7.8 and 10.1% respectively for first and second twins), low birth weight (53.2% for the first and 61.1% for the second twin), stillbirth (3.6% for the first and 5.7% for the second twin), early neonatal death (3.5% for the first and 5.2% for the second twin), admission to NICU (23.6% for the first and 29.3% for the second twin) and any adverse perinatal outcomes (67% for the first twin and 72.3% for the second). Outcomes were consistently worse for the second twin across all outcomes. Poisson multiple regression analysis identified several factors independently associated with an adverse perinatal outcome, including both maternal complications and twin pregnancy.

Conclusion: Twin pregnancy is significantly associated with severe maternal morbidity and with worse perinatal outcomes, especially for the second twin.

Citing Articles

Effect of gestational weight gain on adverse birth outcomes in twin pregnancies: a prospective cohort study in Chinese women.

Zhao R, Zhang A, Wang Y, Chai Y, Du F, Xu Q BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025; 25(1):169.

PMID: 39962413 PMC: 11834644. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-025-07234-7.


Placental abruption and perinatal mortality in twins: novel insight into management at preterm versus term gestations.

Lee R, Brandt J, Ananth C Eur J Epidemiol. 2024; 39(11):1267-1276.

PMID: 39576360 PMC: 11646271. DOI: 10.1007/s10654-024-01171-z.


Obstetric and neonatal outcomes in the management of twin pregnancies with gestational diabetes using the IADPSG criteria for singleton pregnancies.

Ma J, Yang D, Lv J, Liu S, Gao L, Bi Y BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024; 24(1):770.

PMID: 39567922 PMC: 11577653. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-06970-6.


Development and validation of an ultrasound-based estimated fetal weight reference for Chinese twin pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study.

Yang J, Yu H, Zhao Y, Cheng Z, Du Y, Yuan P BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024; 24(1):718.

PMID: 39497086 PMC: 11536931. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-06924-y.


Comparing Perinatal Outcomes of Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART)-Induced vs. Naturally Conceived Twin Pregnancies.

Perros P, Koutras A, Prokopakis I, Fasoulakis Z, Ntounis T, Boulieris G Cureus. 2024; 16(9):e69842.

PMID: 39435194 PMC: 11492549. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.69842.


References
1.
Jacquemyn Y, Martens G, Ruyssinck G, Michiels I, van Overmeire B . A matched cohort comparison of the outcome of twin versus singleton pregnancies in Flanders, Belgium. Twin Res. 2003; 6(1):7-11. DOI: 10.1375/136905203762687834. View

2.
Wen S, Tan H, Yang Q, Walker M . Prediction of small for gestational age by logistic regression in twins. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005; 45(5):399-404. DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2005.00444.x. View

3.
Shah A, Faundes A, Machoki M, Bataglia V, Amokrane F, Donner A . Methodological considerations in implementing the WHO Global Survey for Monitoring Maternal and Perinatal Health. Bull World Health Organ. 2008; 86(2):126-31. PMC: 2647388. DOI: 10.2471/blt.06.039842. View

4.
Say L, Souza J, Pattinson R . Maternal near miss--towards a standard tool for monitoring quality of maternal health care. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2009; 23(3):287-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2009.01.007. View

5.
Souza J, Gulmezoglu A, Carroli G, Lumbiganon P, Qureshi Z . The world health organization multicountry survey on maternal and newborn health: study protocol. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011; 11:286. PMC: 3258197. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-286. View