A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis to Revise the Fenton Growth Chart for Preterm Infants

Overview

Journal BMC Pediatr

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Pediatrics

Date 2013 Apr 23

PMID 23601190

Citations 966

Authors

Tanis R Fenton

Jae H Kim

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to revise the 2003 Fenton Preterm Growth Chart, specifically to: a) harmonize the preterm growth chart with the new World Health Organization (WHO) Growth Standard, b) smooth the data between the preterm and WHO estimates, informed by the Preterm Multicentre Growth (PreM Growth) study while maintaining data integrity from 22 to 36 and at 50 weeks, and to c) re-scale the chart x-axis to actual age (rather than completed weeks) to support growth monitoring.

Methods: Systematic review, meta-analysis, and growth chart development. We systematically searched published and unpublished literature to find population-based preterm size at birth measurement (weight, length, and/or head circumference) references, from developed countries with: Corrected gestational ages through infant assessment and/or statistical correction; Data percentiles as low as 24 weeks gestational age or lower; Sample with greater than 500 infants less than 30 weeks. Growth curves for males and females were produced using cubic splines to 50 weeks post menstrual age. LMS parameters (skew, median, and standard deviation) were calculated.

Results: Six large population-based surveys of size at preterm birth representing 3,986,456 births (34,639 births < 30 weeks) from countries Germany, United States, Italy, Australia, Scotland, and Canada were combined in meta-analyses. Smooth growth chart curves were developed, while ensuring close agreement with the data between 24 and 36 weeks and at 50 weeks.

Conclusions: The revised sex-specific actual-age growth charts are based on the recommended growth goal for preterm infants, the fetus, followed by the term infant. These preterm growth charts, with the disjunction between these datasets smoothing informed by the international PreM Growth study, may support an improved transition of preterm infant growth monitoring to the WHO growth charts.

Citing Articles

Can prenatal conditions impact the effect of omega-3 on bronchopulmonary dysplasia in very preterm infants? A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

Rais H, Pronovost E, Guillot M, Boutin A, Simonyan D, Mohamed I Eur J Pediatr. 2025; 184(4):243.

PMID: 40072608 DOI: 10.1007/s00431-025-06053-4.

Reliability of the Fenton growth curve method in predicting birth weight in newborns born at or before 36 weeks gestational age.

Gungor S, Hou W, Decristofaro J, Maduekwe E Front Pediatr. 2025; 13:1482823.

PMID: 40017706 PMC: 11865019. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2025.1482823.

Postnatal Growth Assessment of the Very-Low-Birth-Weight Preterm Infant.

McNelis K, Thoene M, Huff K, Fu T, Aljanini Z, Viswanathan S Children (Basel). 2025; 12(2).

PMID: 40003299 PMC: 11854838. DOI: 10.3390/children12020197.

Early childhood weight trajectory differences in twins, singletons, and gestational-age matched singletons.

Booman A, Foster B, Lyon-Scott K, Marino M, Snowden J, Boone-Heinonen J Prev Med Rep. 2025; 50:102984.

PMID: 39974658 PMC: 11835609. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2025.102984.

The Association Between Longer Maternal Leukocyte Telomere Length in the Immediate Postpartum Period and Preterm Birth in a Predominately Latina Cohort of Mothers.

Dutson U, Lin J, Jelliffe-Pawlowski L, Coleman-Phox K, Rand L, Wojcicki J Matern Child Health J. 2025; .

PMID: 39969640 DOI: 10.1007/s10995-025-04056-z.

References

Carrascosa A, Yeste D, Copil A, Almar J, Salcedo S, Gussinye M . [Anthropometric growth patterns of preterm and full-term newborns (24-42 weeks' gestational age) at the Hospital Materno-Infantil Vall d'Hebron (Barcelona)(1997-2002]. An Pediatr (Barc). 2004; 60(5):406-16. DOI: 10.1016/s1695-4033(04)78299-5. View

Roberts C, Mueller L, Hadler J . Birth-weight percentiles by gestational age, Connecticut 1988-1993. Conn Med. 1996; 60(3):131-40. View

de Onis M, Garza C, Victora C, Onyango A, Frongillo E, Martines J . The WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study: planning, study design, and methodology. Food Nutr Bull. 2004; 25(1 Suppl):S15-26. DOI: 10.1177/15648265040251S103. View

Blair E, Liu Y, de Klerk N, Lawrence D . Optimal fetal growth for the Caucasian singleton and assessment of appropriateness of fetal growth: an analysis of a total population perinatal database. BMC Pediatr. 2005; 5(1):13. PMC: 1174874. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2431-5-13. View

Bernstein I, Mohs G, Rucquoi M, Badger G . Case for hybrid "fetal growth curves": a population-based estimation of normal fetal size across gestational age. J Matern Fetal Med. 1996; 5(3):124-7. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6661(199605/06)5:3<124::AID-MFM5>3.0.CO;2-O. View

Bertino E, Coscia A, Mombro M, Boni L, Rossetti G, Fabris C . Postnatal weight increase and growth velocity of very low birthweight infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2006; 91(5):F349-56. PMC: 2672838. DOI: 10.1136/adc.2005.090993. View

Ramos F, Perez G, Jane M, Prats R . Construction of the birth weight by gestational age population reference curves of Catalonia (Spain): Methods and development. Gac Sanit. 2009; 23(1):76-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2008.03.001. View

Thomas P, Peabody J, Turnier V, Clark R . A new look at intrauterine growth and the impact of race, altitude, and gender. Pediatrics. 2000; 106(2):E21. DOI: 10.1542/peds.106.2.e21. View

Hutcheon J, Platt R . The missing data problem in birth weight percentiles and thresholds for "small-for-gestational-age". Am J Epidemiol. 2008; 167(7):786-92. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwm327. View

10.

Sauer P . Can extrauterine growth approximate intrauterine growth? Should it?. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007; 85(2):608S-613S. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/85.2.608S. View

11.

Cole T, Williams A, Wright C . Revised birth centiles for weight, length and head circumference in the UK-WHO growth charts. Ann Hum Biol. 2010; 38(1):7-11. DOI: 10.3109/03014460.2011.544139. View

12.

Cole T, Green P . Smoothing reference centile curves: the LMS method and penalized likelihood. Stat Med. 1992; 11(10):1305-19. DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780111005. View

13.

Kato N, Asaka A . [Reference birthweight for multiple births in Japan]. Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2002; 49(4):361-70. View

14.

Riddle W, DonLevy S, LaFleur B, Rosenbloom S, Shenai J . Equations describing percentiles for birth weight, head circumference, and length of preterm infants. J Perinatol. 2006; 26(9):556-61. DOI: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211572. View

15.

Montoya-Restrepo N, Correa-Morales J . [Birth-weight curves]. Rev Salud Publica (Bogota). 2007; 9(1):1-10. DOI: 10.1590/s0124-00642007000100002. View

16.

Voigt M, Zels K, Guthmann F, Hesse V, Gorlich Y, Straube S . Somatic classification of neonates based on birth weight, length, and head circumference: quantification of the effects of maternal BMI and smoking. J Perinat Med. 2011; 39(3):291-7. DOI: 10.1515/jpm.2011.017. View

17.

Davidson S, Sokolover N, Erlich A, Litwin A, Linder N, Sirota L . New and improved Israeli reference of birth weight, birth length, and head circumference by gestational age: a hospital-based study. Isr Med Assoc J. 2008; 10(2):130-4. View

18.

Uehara R, Miura F, Itabashi K, Fujimura M, Nakamura Y . Distribution of birth weight for gestational age in Japanese infants delivered by cesarean section. J Epidemiol. 2011; 21(3):217-22. PMC: 3899412. DOI: 10.2188/jea.je20100123. View

19.

Gibbons K, Chang A, Flenady V, Mahomed K, Gardener G, Gray P . Validation and refinement of an Australian customised birthweight model using routinely collected data. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010; 50(6):506-11. DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2010.01219.x. View

20.

Niklasson A, Albertsson-Wikland K . Continuous growth reference from 24th week of gestation to 24 months by gender. BMC Pediatr. 2008; 8:8. PMC: 2294116. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2431-8-8. View